|
-
07-23-2019, 10:19 AM #91
-
07-23-2019, 11:11 AM #92
-
-
07-23-2019, 11:16 AM #93
-
07-23-2019, 11:19 AM #94
Mueller begs Dems to let his deputy be sworn in to testify alongside him to answer questions he might “not” be able to answer himself. Lmao. An unprecented request and one which should be denied by Nadler if he has any respect for this sideshow he has created.
I was always looking at the finger pointing at
the moon. Now I'm just looking at the moon.
And theres no me looking. Theres just looking.
-
07-23-2019, 11:19 AM #95
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
- Posts: 100,824
- Rep Power: 1578593
If Mueller had more information to damage Trump that was not in the report why did Mueller himself ask Barr for the DOJ to put out a letter to limit the scope of his upcoming congressional testimony.
China is asshoe !!!
Super Straight HTC Crew, Pureblood Crew & a Jeepbrah (no ducks)
Florida is GOAT
Gen X: Humanity's last hope
-
07-23-2019, 11:21 AM #96
-
-
07-23-2019, 11:21 AM #97
-
07-23-2019, 11:44 AM #98
It’s not possible to prove a universal negative statement. For ex, how does Trump prove this statement: “I never obstructed justice.” It’s only possible to find that statement false,with a counterexample: “Here is evidence of obstruction.”
Thus Mueller exonerated Trump because he couldn’t find a counterexample as described. He DID say that if Congress redefines Obstruction, they might find something borderline with which they could pursue Trump...such law being passed AFTER any such act (which makes prosecution void for that act).Last edited by Streetbull; 07-23-2019 at 11:50 AM.
“From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be rememberèd—
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother...”
-
07-23-2019, 11:53 AM #99
Ding ding ding.
All of the pertinent questions revolve around questions not directly covered in the report. Why did 4 members of your team get kicked off for bias? How on earth did you choose such a biased team? When did you know collusion didn't exist? Why Didn't you include xzy? Why did you call mifsud a Russian agent when all evidence shows he is western intel? Why did you manipulate trump's lawyers recordings? Why did you manipulate papadapolous emails?
He wont touch any of these. Stick to the one sided report.
-
07-23-2019, 12:20 PM #100
1 of 2 things will happen tomorrow...
1. Mueller will not pull that ambiguous bulls hit and flat out say if Trump committed obstruction and then things will be taken from there.
2. It will once again be a big nothing burger and this is all for show to rile people up on the whole Russia hoax again.In Hoots We Trust.
-
-
07-23-2019, 12:31 PM #101There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
-
07-23-2019, 01:01 PM #102
-
07-23-2019, 01:04 PM #103
-
07-23-2019, 01:07 PM #104
this just in:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...stify-him.html
Republicans are hopping mad after Mueller makes last-minute request to have his former chief of staff testify WITH him tomorrow so someone can answer questions he can't touch
Mueller sought to have former aide Aaron Zebley sworn in
Former chief of staff helped former special counsel prepare for hearings
Mueller has vowed to stick to within the parameters of his public report
Top panel Republican said majority allowing business 'to devolve into chaos'
Called it an 'apparent stunt' and said Zebley could both advise Mueller and testify
Served in FBI counterterrorism division, followed Mueller to private practice and joined his probeThere is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
-
-
07-23-2019, 01:21 PM #105
I don't think Nadler is going to permit it. Mueller starting to squirm.
edit looks like it was denied but he will still be there to advise Mueller.
Zebley will be there to advise Mueller, but the special counsel will be the only one answering the committee questions, the source said. Democrats only plan to swear in Mueller as a witness.I was always looking at the finger pointing at
the moon. Now I'm just looking at the moon.
And theres no me looking. Theres just looking.
-
07-23-2019, 01:29 PM #106
Mueller told Barr and others the reason he didn’t charge trump with obstruction wasn’t due to the OLC guidelines that you cannot indict a president. He punted to Barr, Rosenstein, and DOJ lawyers who reviewed it and said there was not evidence to charge. Barr even went as far as to say he wasn’t sure that muellers depiction of all events were accurate, but he took them as accurate and still couldn’t charge. It’s done. There is nothing mueller can say that will change that. If he does say the OLC policy, it will be muellers word against Barr and everyone else in the room who heard the multiple conversations.
The dems wouldn’t expose mueller to republican questioning, which he will either get roasted or just dodge, without a specific sound bite prepared. There is a well planned end game in mind, but it’s anyones guess what exactly it will be.
Muellers goal was to find any crime on trump and indict him, and he failed. In failing, he couldn’t just outright say there was nothing, so he put the burden of proof on trump to prove his innocence and said he couldn’t. There are no legal ramifications here... except that it keeps the narrative alive indefinitely. That is their goal now... to keep a false narrative alive through the election. It’s all they have.
Bookmarks