Reply
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User RomanFalcon's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2019
    Age: 54
    Posts: 7
    Rep Power: 0
    RomanFalcon is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    RomanFalcon is offline

    Best Method for Measuring Bodyfat: Jackson/Pollock 3 site or Tape?

    I recently started attempting to track my bodyfat to serve as a guide to my lean cutting plan. So far I have attempted the 2 site circumference tape around my neck/abdomen and just today I also tried the Jackson/Pollock 3 site pinch method with calipers. I watched the videos, so I am pretty confident that my methodology isn't off, but my reading for one was 23.4% with tape and 20% with Jackson/Pollock. That seems like a pretty wide deviation between the two options. It would be great if I were at 20% BF already, but I am extremely doubtful of that.

    Is there anything definitive to suggest that one method is supremely more accurate versus the other?

    Thank you.
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User sunsean's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2009
    Age: 43
    Posts: 4,560
    Rep Power: 47204
    sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) sunsean has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    sunsean is offline
    Originally Posted by RomanFalcon View Post
    Is there anything definitive to suggest that one method is supremely more accurate versus the other?

    Thank you.
    Nope. Don’t go looking for an exact number; rather, use the calipers consistently to track your trends over time.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Not Tracking Tucane's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2016
    Posts: 2,566
    Rep Power: 14220
    Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tucane is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Tucane is offline
    IME Jackson Pollock gave me false lows in the past, it became really obvious when I was around 8%BF and it gave me a 4%-reading.

    Tape measure is the more consistent one of the two from what I remember. It really doesn't matter though, as any of them can be used to track progress over time, which matters more than a spec number.
    ~ Feel free to PM me if you have any questions ~

    " As mind ~ as matter "
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    My pronouns are bro/brah Tommy W.'s Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2006
    Posts: 20,691
    Rep Power: 134276
    Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) Tommy W. has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    Tommy W. is offline
    Don't look for a certain %, look for progression. This can be done by measuring your waist at the navel, 1" of loss here signifies abou 5-7 lbs of fatloss. BF% is really a meaningless number actually. Even the extremely expensive machines can be way off. Plus the way someone stores fat can be a huge factor. 2 people with the same BF% can look vastly different.
    If you don't get what you want you didn't want it bad enough

    Pro Choice
    Non Christian
    MAGA
    2A Advocate
    FJB
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User broganoff's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2017
    Age: 42
    Posts: 507
    Rep Power: 2496
    broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000) broganoff is just really nice. (+1000)
    broganoff is offline
    Originally Posted by Tommy W. View Post
    Don't look for a certain %, look for progression. This can be done by measuring your waist at the navel, 1" of loss here signifies abou 5-7 lbs of fatloss. BF% is really a meaningless number actually. Even the extremely expensive machines can be way off. Plus the way someone stores fat can be a huge factor. 2 people with the same BF% can look vastly different.
    I've always wondered- is it best to relax your belly or even push it out as much possible? Or suck it in? What is the standard when bodybuilders give measurements?

    I use a myotape FWIW, seems to help with the accuracy and consistency.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User RomanFalcon's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2019
    Age: 54
    Posts: 7
    Rep Power: 0
    RomanFalcon is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    RomanFalcon is offline
    Thanks for the responses fellas. I understand that BF% is essentially arbitrary in it's own right. I will stick with the tape since I have been doing it for longer, and have built a better baseline with said measurements regarding progress.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts