Will President Trump be impeached? Yes or no?

[401Delta]

Even though they don't have the votes to convict him in the Senate, he could still be impeached in the House. What do you think, will they pull the trigger or just keep making threats until 2020?

Nadler is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and has the power on his own to bring articles of impeachment to the full house floor, I don't think he would without Pelosi's blessing.

So far Nancy is just bitching, but not threatening or endorsing concrete action...



And Schiff & Nadler have only, for a second time in a letter sent today, invited Mueller to come and testify before Congress, though they have not said they would actually subpoena him.

My bet is that articles of impeachment will be drafted, but that they never make it out of committee, in spite of Nadler undoubtedly holding endless hearings for the next several months, or for as long as he can milk it.

[Redfish225]

No.

[Noliberals4]

Trump would want it because if they fail, it would boost his popularity significantly. Bill Clinton actually got MORE popular after a successful impeachment. Hell even if they do impeach Trump, it'd obviously never get a conviction because of the Senate, so he'd become more popular anyway.

[401Delta]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer released the following joint statement.

“What we’ve learned today is that Attorney General Barr deliberately distorted significant portions of Special Counsel Mueller’s report.

“Special Counsel Mueller’s report paints a disturbing picture of a president who has been weaving a web of deceit, lies and improper behavior and acting as if the law doesn’t apply to him. But if you hadn’t read the report and listened only to Mr. Barr, you wouldn’t have known any of that because Mr. Barr has been so misleading.

“There are at least four significant ways that Mr. Barr has misled the public on the contents of the Mueller report:

Attorney General Barr led us to believe that the Office of Legal Counsel opinion did not play a significant role in Special Counsel Mueller’s refusal to make a decision on obstruction. In fact, the report shows the opinion played a major role, and probably the decisive, role in Special Counsel Mueller’s decision not to reach a conclusion.

Attorney General Barr presented a conclusion that the president did not obstruct justice but Special Counsel Mueller’s report cites several instances of presidential action that appear to undercut that finding.

Third, the special counsel’s own words directly and dramatically undercut Attorney General Barr’s claim that the president fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation. As the report shows, the president in fact did the opposite – from firing the FBI Director, to pressuring senior officials to lie, to refusing to testify, to attempting to fire the special counsel himself.

Lastly, the special counsel’s report confirms that members of the Trump campaign were aware of Russian attempts to interfere with the election, but instead of reporting this to the federal authorities, like any patriotic American would have done, the Trump campaign and President Trump himself openly encouraged it for the purposes of winning a presidential election. That Attorney General Barr omitted this from all of his public statements regarding the report should shake any patriotic American to the core.

“For these reasons, it is imperative that the rest of the report and the underlying documents be made available to Congress and that Special Counsel Mueller testify before both chambers as soon as possible.”

We all know it doesn't matter what is in the unredacted report...if they want to impeach they have the votes, and if they do it is JUST for political gain, and not to seek justice.

Also, here is an informative video on how Democrats really feel about releasing 'the underlying documents'.

[hendrixfreak70]

Definitely not now.

[Reflexez]

No.

I'd say it's pointless to even try.

The Muller report couldn't find any collusion, it couldn't find enough of anything else to build a criminal case they felt they could win/was worthy of going after. For me the only thing I've seen come out of it on top of Barr's assessment is that Trump seems completely unhinged at times, however after 2 years it should be clear to Democrats that a large portion of his base are totally fine with his crazy tweets, ramblings and acting like a total moron as long as they believe he's making policy changes they want, which is fair enough.

Democrats should take a step back, build a platform which includes those who were promised changes by Trump and never got them, pick up those who are unhappy with his conduct and overall job and nail him on actual failings such as not getting a wall built, etc. Carrying on down a wild goose chase on the hopes to catch him out isn't going to do anything useful, instead use what they've learned from the Muller report against him in campaigning.

[Roldz]

Absolutely. Any day now. Tick tock, amirite?

[brighamw]

We can certainly hope they try, God what a **** show that will be

[icetrauma]

I actually think they are deranged enough to do it. If they don't it'll be Pelosi and Schumer calling for the brakes to be put on. They'll squeal and squawk and make a chit ton of noise in the meantime. If they do, that'll help Trump even more. The markets will dive at the uncertainty of the outcome, even though the Senate will not go through with it. Job's might actually decrease. Big business will go in to savings mode till the process is over. And Trump will come out with 4 more years and the Dem's will have shot themselves in the foot again.

[Travis99]

It’s pathetic how all the democrats have done over the past 2.5 years is be mad.

Just pathetic.

In b4 every democrat platform is based on.

I’ll impeach him

White man bad

Climate change

[A-GAME]

No way, Jose.

[Retoaded]

The Schumer Pelosi statement strongly signals they are pursuing a "cover up" angle and will just demand justice and evidence for the next two years.

Politics.

Shocker!

[Trapstar4.4]

nah pelosi isnt going to go for that.
knowing the history is important in this scenario

[mr.left hook]

Good Night sweet Prince..... a lot of damaging information was left out, but the truth will always come out
4/18/2019 6:20PM

[Mark1T]

He's a nazi and white supremacist and Israel is bad.

No borders and the Green New Deal!

[401Delta]

The House Majority Leader (sort of) backtracks on impeachment. After telling CNN earlier today that “impeachment is not worthwhile at this point”, he sent out this word salad tweet a few hours later (I'm guessing to appease the angry mobs of libs calling for impeachment).

[SillieBazzillie]

Nah, the non-cultist are woke and tired of this embarrassing Trump test. He's getting voted out bigly in 2020.

He barely won against the most unpopular dem candidate in decades with 3rd parties taking a good share of the dem vote and with people giving him a chance.

We've all seen what a useless POS he is now so buh bye in 2020.

[KyleAaron]

Only if he's elected for a third term in 2024.

[topperstyle]

Not unless dems want to take it to the streets.

[401Delta]

Only if he's elected for a third term in 2024.

While that's not possible if he wins in 2020, it might be possible for him to run and be elected VP in 2024*, causing liberal heads explode across the globe .

The 22nd/12th Amendments are a bit conflicting...

Trump/Pence 2020
Crenshaw/Trump 2024??










not srs

[gwem32170191]

Only if he's elected for a third term in 2024.

Trump on that FDR time?

No to the impeachment question.

[Underwrought]

While that's not possible if he wins in 2020, it might be possible for him to run and be elected VP in 2024*, causing liberal heads explode across the globe .

The 22nd/12th Amendments are a bit conflicting...

Trump/Pence 2020
Crenshaw/Trump 2024??










not srs

Trump on that FDR time?

No to the impeachment question.

The funny thing about that law is that its extremely recent. For most of the countries history that was never a stipulation.

[chaunce54]

I'd really love for them to try.

[401Delta]

I'd really love for them to try.

Here ya go...

[JoshSP1985]

We can certainly hope they try, God what a **** show that will be

Talk about firing up Trumps base, if they tried to impeach Rs would have the highest turn out in the history of the party.

[chaunce54]

Here ya go...

[img]https://i.imgur.com/XNqPSPB.jpg[img]

We'll see, but I'm sure this will be more posturing and less action, as usual.

[hoganrulz]

If he wins in 2020 they will push for it. I haven't really looked in to this whole Muller report but I read on Twitter (lmao yes, strong sauce) that there's a whole load of other illegal chit going on or went on.

[StarFox]

I’ve heard that the walls are closing in, but is the noose still tightening?

Tick tock on the clock but the party don’t stop whooooa oh oh oh

[401Delta]

If he wins in 2020 they will push for it. I haven't really looked in to this whole Muller report but I read on Twitter (lmao yes, strong sauce) that there's a whole load of other illegal chit going on or went on.

They won't impeach him after the election, since they still wouldn't have the votes in the Senate. They know they can't get rid of him by impeaching him, so the ONLY benefit would be to damage him politically before the election.

Right now it's only the usual suspects (the far left progressives and associates) calling for it. Nadler just issued subpoenas for the unredacted report and underlying materials, but hasn't advocated for impeachment (and he's the only one that really matters besides Pelosi).

[JewishSuperHero]

There’s zero chance.

Talk about firing up Trumps base, if they tried to impeach Rs would have the highest turn out in the history of the party.

No matter what they do he’ll fire up the base. He’s really good at playing the underdog and “us against the world” angle.

“If the Democrats really think I did something wrong, then why didn’t they try to impeach me?”