I've heard that Golberg has lost alot of size, I guess i'll see when I watch Half Past Dead 2 tonight. But they both have huge traps, shoulders, and chest. I can't figure out why there arms are small compared to the rest of them.
I think Golberg's build is the best of all time.
I'd say that Goldberg's chest is like 52 inches or so, and arms are like 18-19'', and the same for Batista, does that sound right?
|
Closed Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 45
-
05-18-2007, 01:58 PM #1
Who has a better build, Goldberg or Batista?
-
05-18-2007, 01:59 PM #2
ROFL at Goldberg and Batista's arms only being 18-19!!!
HAHAHAHAHAAA
-
05-18-2007, 02:00 PM #3
- Join Date: Feb 2005
- Location: England, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 40
- Posts: 14,371
- Rep Power: 19513
Currently clearing a rep debt to over 1000 people in this thread
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=110024901
Upto post #566 done as off August 29th 2011
At 5 reps a day, this will take a while! Plus Im not on every day, but I'll still get through this..
Current status - Cutting - Start 182.25 - Current 176.75 - Aim 165
-
05-18-2007, 02:05 PM #4
LOL! No. Hell my arms (with fat, water and the pump) are that big and I know Batista and Goldberg's arm measurements are alot bigger than mine.
BLM (Brock Lesnar Matters)
Always go full potato crew
-
-
05-18-2007, 02:05 PM #5
Batista has small arms in contrast to his shoulders.
-
05-18-2007, 02:10 PM #6
Dude, no way there arms are 20''. Cena' aren't even 20 inches and his arms look alot bigger than there's did.
-
05-18-2007, 02:19 PM #7
I think Goldberg had the better of the two by a pretty wide margin.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
-
05-18-2007, 02:20 PM #8
-
-
05-18-2007, 02:21 PM #9
Goldberg had the "GLADIATOR" type build....like hes ready for battle...
and batista has the bodybuilding contest build....
goldberg just let the chest hair fly...lol
-
05-18-2007, 02:31 PM #10
I prefer Goldberg's physique, although Batista is a lot better in bodybuilding terms.
My 100% free website: healthierwithscience.com
My YouTube channel: youtube.com/@benjaminlevinsonmd17
-
05-18-2007, 02:35 PM #11
- Join Date: May 2005
- Location: Caracas, Venezuela
- Age: 37
- Posts: 11,718
- Rep Power: 9845
i also prefer Goldberg's physique, not as cut but more powerful looking imo
www.yardblesspro.com
-
05-18-2007, 03:49 PM #12
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Posts: 41,221
- Rep Power: 23268
Goldberg.
"The sun is always gonna rise, and always gonna set and I'll just keep on punching because everyday is gonna bring something different and I just want to be ready for it."
- Jens Pulver
If you refer to a fighter who you've never met in real life as "my boy" as though their performance somehow reflects well on you for simply being a fan, you're a lame ass.
-
-
05-18-2007, 07:34 PM #13
I think goldberg as a more athletic, explosive build while batista is bigger than him in size and strength...
Batista is listed as 6'5, 315 lbs.
while goldberg is listed as 6'4, 285 lbs.
-
05-18-2007, 07:51 PM #14
i think goldberg by a mile, but i always take away points from batista for the odd looking veins in his arms....i think it looks horrible
i know he can't help it and everyone can't help genetics and **** but i'm judging by what i see. Goldberg is a very proportional and athletic build
-
05-18-2007, 07:58 PM #15
- Join Date: Jul 2002
- Location: Round Lake, Illinois, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 5,899
- Rep Power: 3926
I love batistas veins! FOr anyone not thinking that their arms are over 20 inches, take into account their heights-6'4-6'5 for both of them.
Extreme Dips Crew
Lifetime reps: FeralBeast
-
05-18-2007, 08:26 PM #16
Batista's veins could be due to his tricep tears and other tears he has had...thats why in the new rocky movie stallones right side was all veins like batistas, because of the tears that he had in his pecs, and how they had to go in and repair them, and thats how the veins got there...
not saying that is truly the case but in stallones it was
and at one point in wcw goldberg was being listed as 6 4, 295 pounds...obviously everyones weight is exaggerated
and as far as someone saying that batista is stronger than goldberg...id have to disagree..
goldberg had/has silly strength....big show in the jackhammer a couple times, and when he military pressed steiner like 7 times...
-
-
05-18-2007, 08:33 PM #17
Batista has a very good physique, even though he's got problems with it due to injuries. He walks around leaner with good vascularity at the expense of mass, fullness, and symmatry. Before his numerous injuries, the guy had a pretty damn well-rounded physique even though he didn't have as low bodyfat as he does now.
If I'm to answer the question who has a better build I would say Batista pre-injuries.
I think Lashley blows them both away though. That guy is a freak. In fact, I think he should quit wrestling and become a bodybuilder because he may actually be good at bodybuilding."Pain hurts, lemme tell ya. It can ruin your whole day." -Bill "Superfoot" Wallace
-
05-18-2007, 09:04 PM #18****************************
* MISC IT expert *
* Ron Paul for president!! *
****************************
-
05-18-2007, 09:32 PM #19
-
05-18-2007, 09:56 PM #20
-
-
05-18-2007, 11:06 PM #21
i just watched Goldberg's lastest movie, and no way were his arms even 18'' in that. He must have lost alot of size, although he didn't look that big in the Longest Yard. Batista is a beast, but his arms are under 20'' and he's got nothing on Lashley or Cena in the arm category.
-
05-19-2007, 05:02 AM #22
-
05-19-2007, 06:52 AM #23
The WWE did used to announce Batista at 6'6 315, now lately I have noticed when he comes to the ring they say he weighs 290. He must have lost some weight.
I think the WWE exagerates alot of the wrestlers weight though. They say Undertaker is 320 lbs, and I just don't see that.
Cena is 6'1 248 I believe.
Goldberg used to be 6'3 or 6'4 280 I believe when he wrestled. Not sure now.
I think Lesnar when he wrestled was 6'4 295 or something like that.
By the way, Lesnar is interested in joining the UFC and so is Kurt Angle. Dana White, UFC President, is in talks with Angle.Last edited by ryannath; 05-19-2007 at 07:00 AM.
-
05-19-2007, 06:58 AM #24
-
-
05-19-2007, 07:03 AM #25
^^Man, I know Angle is in talks with the UFC, just look it up. Also, like I said, I don't think that is the real weight for alot of the wrestlers, but they are announced as weighing that, and their weight changes alot also.
-
05-19-2007, 07:11 AM #26
-
05-19-2007, 07:29 AM #27
Dana White would be willing to make Lesnar/Angle happen in UFC but I think Angle is scared to fight Lesnar in the Octagon. For Angles own good, I personally wouldn't want to see it happen. Angle/Puder either.
BLM (Brock Lesnar Matters)
Always go full potato crew
-
05-19-2007, 11:53 AM #28
the biggest wrestlers of all time have to be bobby lashley and scott steiner. Both at 6'1, 275. I'm talking about the one's who actually worked out and were lean, so don't throw big show or andrea the giant in this category :P
-
-
05-19-2007, 01:39 PM #29
-
05-19-2007, 02:44 PM #30
I like goldbergs build only cause he still looks normal or natural looking...brock lesnar lol who wants to have that kinda build all traps no neck.
Batista is freaking lean and the dudes V taper is amazing dude has a freaskish look h has those wide shoulders and small waist with big traps and delts.
if he chose bodybuilding instead imagine that dude has a good base.
Bookmarks