I’ve always thought it to be of little importance. I would’ve much rather have strong muscles than toned ones. But I’ve had somewhat of an epiphany recently (not going into detail about that) and I want to know what it’s like having abs. I’m 16 years old, currently at novice-intermediate with my lifts (on Fierce 5 for 6 months in a row). My BF is roughly 27% according to an online calc (I know it’s not accurate so I’d say +/- another 5 percent). Point is, no abs. And they won’t be coming anytime soon. So I want to ask those who have somewhat visible abs, is it worth it? I’m assuming most of you on this specific forum have been fat at some point, and that some of you have lost that fat. Is it worth eating at a deficit and doing intense, long-lasting cardio to get those abs or not? Would I be better off just going at maintenance and getting stronger? All answers appreciated!
|
Thread: Is it worth getting a six-pack?
-
06-22-2018, 01:31 AM #1
Is it worth getting a six-pack?
-
06-22-2018, 01:38 AM #2
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Location: Suffolk, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 54,512
- Rep Power: 1338185
No.
They are the icing on the cake if you have already built a good physique.
But the pursuit of low BF especially in novices is leading to legions of small weak hungry individuals who obsess about calories, macros and sodium bloating as far as I can tell. It ends up at "skinny fat" far more often than it ends up at something that might be considered desirable.
So you are doing the right thing by prioritising strength and muscle size IMO.
Your BF might not be that high, post a picture if you want an opinion.
-
06-22-2018, 01:53 AM #3
I’ll post a few pics when I get home. I’ve lost some fat (I kinda ate how I wanted so far, tried going like 200 cals deficit on most days, but ended up saying “**** it” and ate myself to a surplus. I was usually at 509-1500 cals at surplus every week). I still noticed recently how my veins started popping out more so that might be a lower BF. Could just be a good pump and the effort I put in a workout. Anyway I appreciate the advice, I’ll try to get to a stronger level before going on a cut.
-
06-22-2018, 04:05 AM #4
-
-
06-22-2018, 04:14 AM #5
-
06-27-2018, 07:28 AM #6
-
06-28-2018, 01:55 AM #7
I was borderline obese at 210 lb (95 kg). diet down to 137 lb (62 kg) chasing the six pack.
At 137 lb, I had the six pack. Guess what, nobody was impressed at it, instead people are shocked at how skinny and small I was. People are more interested on how I can lose the weight. Most common comment was: "are you sick?"
I gained 26 lb (12 kg) since then and put on some muscles. Lost the 6 packs, has 4 packs only now. People says I definitely looked better now.
So is it worth it? I would say yes, only if you can maintain a medium or big frame. Otherwise no.
-
06-28-2018, 04:08 AM #8
-
-
06-28-2018, 04:28 AM #9
-
06-28-2018, 04:33 AM #10
-
06-28-2018, 04:41 AM #11
I hope one day I get some, just for myself so I can say I went from a fatty to a lean muscle machine but due to my soft belly fat and loose skin on the lower belly side I may have to be happy with a 4-pack ... better than a 0 pack haha.
Right now I am just happy to be in better shape and I am slowly working towards a better physique, I think overall health and mental well being is the most important in my opinion.
-
06-28-2018, 04:47 AM #12
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 95
- Rep Power: 1790
At 16... dude you're still growing. Healthy fats are important for hormone development at this age as well. Nothing wrong with building muscle and wanting to be healthy, but that's the key, and the thing that needs to be paramount over having visible ab muscles, BEING HEALTHY.
A visible 6 pack don't mean **** if you made yourself sick and nutritionally deficient in the process.
Look, at anywhere near 27% BF, veins popping out is certainly not because of being "fit"... the vascularity you see in 8% or less BF guys.. no, it's not gonna be that. At just about 30% body fat, you'll be lucky if a phlebotomist could even FIND a vein in your arm. lol. Near 30% BF is just plain fat and overweight, period. I know, I was there.
And you certainly ARE NOT decreasing BF while eating in a 500-1500 calorie surplus each week. That's a good way to put additional fat on, however. Probably a good pound per month. Do you want to have 12+ more pounds of fat after a years' time? I wouldn't. If you want that, I'll give ya the extra 15lbs of fat I've got now. lol.
So look at it this way, bud... it's more important to be healthy and generally fit, than to be low body fat % and have visible abs that you only think other people care about. Unless it's just floozy girls who are so shallow they only like you for superficial things like that, but don't really care about you.
You've got a good 70 more years ahead of you to make mistakes in life, so try not to start too early with this one thinking that visible abs is all that matters (or that it matters at all).Last edited by jasondjulian; 06-29-2018 at 05:17 AM.
-
-
06-28-2018, 04:49 AM #13
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 95
- Rep Power: 1790
Quoted for truth. Being happy with yourself and not an overweight diabetic who can't play with his kids or walk up a flight of stairs is critically important.
"0 pack"... yeah, that's what I call having a "keg" instead of a 4 or 6 pack. lol. I think I'm down from keg to having a growler- but at least I got rid of the foam packing material that came with it!
-
06-28-2018, 05:28 AM #14
-
06-28-2018, 08:29 AM #15
The thing with abs is - they're difficult to get and difficult to maintain. In a perfect world, I would bulk up to my max potential muscle mass, then cut down to 10% and maintain there forever. It doesn't work like that, though...when I cut down to abs, it's great while it lasts, but sooner or later I decide I want to bulk up and add more muscle, and no matter how careful I am, the body fat rises and the abs fade...so the cycle continues...
I will say this: having and maintaining 6% body fat abs (ripped) is not worth it because you essentially can't eat anything. For me, the ideal would be to have a solid amount of lean mass and maintain around 10-11%, not ripped but lean enough for a 6 pack and good physique.
-
06-28-2018, 08:51 AM #16
-
-
06-28-2018, 09:29 AM #17
-
06-28-2018, 09:48 AM #18
-
06-28-2018, 10:17 AM #19
-
06-28-2018, 10:46 AM #20
-
-
06-28-2018, 11:46 AM #21
I go through stages of being okay with it and not...sometimes, when I'm on the fattier side, I think to myself "what's the point of all this exercise and effort if you don't have the "body" to show for it?" Because as you said my idea of a good body is what we see in the media so if I don't have a rippling 8 pack I feel like I'm not getting the ultimate result.
When in reality I'd probably be happier just sitting around 15% and eating whatever I want and not worrying about it.
-
06-28-2018, 12:02 PM #22
-
06-28-2018, 12:36 PM #23
Tried to rep but on spread - yep, good tip, I try to do that...focus on overall build instead of zeroing in on the spare tire area...for the most part I'm fine with where I'm at, but sometimes when I'm sitting down relaxing...that's when I psych myself out because I see the large collection of fat and can feel it...obviously it's because I'm scrunched up from sitting - but when I was insta lean, like sub 10%, that didn't happen - so in my mind, that is the measure for when I'm truly "fit" - when I have no fat rolls even when sitting hunched over.
Anyway - you know what they say about beauty, it's in the eye of the beholder. It's all about perspective.
-
06-28-2018, 11:30 PM #24
-
-
06-29-2018, 03:53 AM #25
It’s overrated. Mainly because many people pursue one despite having little to no muscle mass. It’s worth it if you have a significant amount of muscle to go with it but not if you’re going to be a skinny twig. Anyone can starve themselves to a six pack but it takes effort and dedication to have a ripped muscular physique with the six pack being the icing on the cake.
advertising not permitted
-
06-29-2018, 04:26 AM #26
-
06-29-2018, 05:29 AM #27
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 95
- Rep Power: 1790
Honestly, for me, I'd rather have a well defined upper body with good muscle mass (not huge necessarily) than have visible ab muscles. For a male, strong shoulders and back, defined arm muscles and a powerful chest are more important aesthetically to me. Oh, and proportionally strong legs too- none of that chicken leg crap- NEVER SKIP LEG DAY! lol. (You should probably be doing lunges/squats and full body workouts anyhow, so legs and core get worked anyhow).
Visible abs, as was said, would be and are icing on the cake. But the overall shape and build are more important. If you have a properly proportioned and strong body overall, the waist region and abdominals in general will appear more fit as well- but visibility of the muscle groups is still determined by overall body fat percentage and distribution.
Depending on your genetics and how your body stores fat reserves, some people may NEVER have visible abs until they are in competition level low body fat %. And that's just not realistic to maintain day to day.
Bookmarks