|
-
05-22-2018, 05:33 AM #31
-
05-22-2018, 05:35 AM #32
-
-
05-22-2018, 05:38 AM #33
- Join Date: Jan 2008
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Posts: 15,000
- Rep Power: 58598
And you have nothing to say about your entire OP being proven to be fake news?
Do you understand that the organizations that collect this data have an agenda to ban guns and as such they inflate the numbers?
Come on man they included fukking police officer accidental discharges in their "school shooting" numbers. They included stray bullets that originated from who knows where, but since they hit a window at a school, it's a "school shooting". They included a robbery that took place in an apartment complex on university property as a "school shooting".
At this point you HAVE to realize that the goal is to ban guns and they will lie and fabricate data to reach that goal.I would die for Palestine
-
05-22-2018, 05:41 AM #34
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 11,351
- Rep Power: 38833
My guns sit where I leave them when I go to work. It's the person that's either looking for media attention/ fame, or doped up on some medication. Why don't they release stats for shooters after being tested for drugs which are likely prescribed?
Sure seems like nowadays there's "medication" for everything.*MFC*
*MAGA*
"I've always wanted to kick a duck up the arse" - Karl Pilkington
WWG1WGA
-
05-22-2018, 06:01 AM #35
-
05-22-2018, 06:03 AM #36
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 45,307
- Rep Power: 406849
-
-
05-22-2018, 06:16 AM #37
lol Everybody else is too busy blowing each other up. I'll stick to trying to solve a legit school shooting every now and then, thanks.
http://cpostdata.uchicago.edu/search_new.php?clear=1"The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed."
See OptimusTrajan' sig
-
05-22-2018, 06:17 AM #38
-
05-22-2018, 06:20 AM #39"The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed."
See OptimusTrajan' sig
-
05-22-2018, 06:31 AM #40
-
-
05-22-2018, 06:37 AM #41
-
05-22-2018, 06:40 AM #42
Wrong. Why do libs assume that more guns equal more gun violence? Do they not understand that a simple linear statistical relationship between two variables in no way means causation?
" It must be tentatively concluded that higher gun ownership rates do not cause higher crime rates, including homicide rates."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...4723521400107X
-
05-22-2018, 07:02 AM #43
-
05-22-2018, 07:24 AM #44
-
-
05-22-2018, 07:48 AM #45
-
05-22-2018, 07:50 AM #46
-
05-22-2018, 08:13 AM #47
-
05-22-2018, 08:13 AM #48
-
-
05-22-2018, 09:57 AM #49
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 19,740
- Rep Power: 88102
Not adjusting per capita...
Only using one type of weapon and not including "school attacks with multiple dead"
Using "attack" to include any discharge of a weapon near campus regardless of time.
Surely not just op creating another BS thread.
reduction in school shootings
reduction in child-deaths from firearms
reduction in child-deaths from firearms
child-deaths from firearms
from firearms
Well chit. I am sure you will be 10 times happier if the kid is killed with a knife instead of a firearm.Finance Degree - USAF INTEL - IIFYM - Injured Crew - KTM XCW300 - Single Track Trail Rider - NRA Supporter - Shunned from MFC - Libertarian - Pragmatist
B: 345, S 375, D 445
Trying to get your ideal outcome often leads to the passing up of practical alternatives that deny your adversaries theirs.
-
05-22-2018, 10:56 AM #50
Damn!
I'm impressed...
And you're right, as a previous already stated "school shootings" is a broad term.
There are actually "good" school shootings using the parameter of "school zones" as a school shooting, police, self defense, etc...
Usually statistics like this also include somebody committing suicide in a school zone well that's not a "school shooting" as far as it pertains to these type discussion...
-
05-22-2018, 11:14 AM #51
-
05-22-2018, 11:21 AM #52
-
-
05-22-2018, 11:23 AM #53
Another Californian liberal speaks his mind
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.med...are-dying/amp/
Scary to watch
-
05-22-2018, 11:29 AM #54
-
05-22-2018, 11:38 AM #55
US has 57x more freedom than ******* countries too, and freedom is dangerous.
Doesnt mean we need to legislate down the the lowest common denominator and let the crazies determine the good peoples freedoms.For every man, there is a sentence, a string of words, that has the power to destroy him
"The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must" -Thucydides
Shall not be Infringed. FUK CHINA.
-
05-22-2018, 11:42 AM #56
- Join Date: Mar 2005
- Location: Denver, Colorado, United States
- Posts: 14,302
- Rep Power: 112448
-
-
05-22-2018, 11:52 AM #57
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Location: Buffalo, New York, United States
- Posts: 1,227
- Rep Power: 14271
I'd bet my last dollar that we have more vehicle related deaths than all those countries as well. More kids are killed due to cars than to guns but I don't see you trying to ban those. Who would've thought that a country with more kids, more schools, and more guns would have more school shootings?
Why are anti-gunners so dishonest when they try to spread their emotionally laced propaganda? You all act like NO OTHER violence happens in schools or outside them and that gun violence is only caused because of the access we have to them. Only a mentally undeveloped sadist can come to the conclusion that stealing guns and shooting up a school is a viable answer to ones personal problems. The recent upswing in school shootings is directly related to ****ty parents bringing up their kids in broken and ****ty households and solving all of their kids problems by putting them on drugs and caving into their demands. The parents of these kids are responsible for their lack of morality and coping ability. How can any of you anti-gunners possibly come to the conclusion here that its the tools fault and not the person's fault who is operating the tool is absolutely beyond me.
-
05-22-2018, 11:56 AM #58
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 19,740
- Rep Power: 88102
You just did what OP did and misuse statistics to make a point.
More guns =/= more gun ownership.
Then you reduced it to pure crime rate and homicide rate and not "Gun Crime and Gun deaths"
"Gun ownership" is the correct measure. However it needs to be presented as the case.
Gun presence does in fact have a strong correlation with "Gun" crimes. After stating gun crime in your first line. You would be correct that it would be smarter to measure the "crime" itself instead of the tool used but pretending they are the same thing is wrong.
I have ran the numbers... the correct statement is "There is no statistically significant relationship between gun ownership and homicide/violent crime." Stating "gun ownership rates does not cause higher crime rates " is also wrong.
Essentially, people decide they want to kill/attack someone then look for the best/easiest to acquire tool for the job. In America that tool is typically guns. In other countries substitution takes place.Last edited by Austanian; 05-22-2018 at 12:03 PM.
Finance Degree - USAF INTEL - IIFYM - Injured Crew - KTM XCW300 - Single Track Trail Rider - NRA Supporter - Shunned from MFC - Libertarian - Pragmatist
B: 345, S 375, D 445
Trying to get your ideal outcome often leads to the passing up of practical alternatives that deny your adversaries theirs.
-
05-22-2018, 12:43 PM #59
-
05-22-2018, 12:46 PM #60
Bookmarks