Official CNN Insanity tracking thread

[EdwardTheGreat]

No, I'm just familiar with Cult 45. So, after reading your drivel, I watched the first 15 seconds. As suspected, no lies.

Imagine being this idiot....CNN says "despite his impeachment....twice"

I watched the first 15 seconds. As suspected, no lies.

Fukn LOL. Impeached twice you say?

CNN says "...and helping to incite of course the deadly Capitol insurrection"

I watched the first 15 seconds. As suspected, no lies.

Fukn LOL. If that was true, why wasn't he "impeached" last month?

[chaunce54]

No, I'm just familiar with Cult 45. So, after reading your drivel, I watched the first 15 seconds. As suspected, no lies.

lol, are you one of CNN's "sources"??

[EdwardTheGreat]

lol, are you one of CNN's "sources"??

Typical lib approach.

This:

I didn't watch the clip - I only read your comment. They probably didn't even lie.

....is the same way they treated all the video evidence of election shenanigans, then claim there was no evidence presented.

[z4v4]

Imagine being this idiot....CNN says "despite his impeachment....twice"



Fukn LOL. Impeached twice you say?

CNN says "...and helping to incite of course the deadly Capitol insurrection"



Fukn LOL. If that was true, why wasn't he "impeached" last month?

- he was impeached twice. That is true. Just because you don't know what impeachment is, doesn't cease it from having happened.

- yes, he did help incite those loons. I can't help if English is not your native language.

[nosirrahx]

Hundreds of pages demonstrating what an absolute travesty the media is but I can't help but to think about how bad that orange guy was.

He sure was, thanks for bringing up mindful and relevant information.

[badreligion]

Imagine being this idiot....CNN says "despite his impeachment....twice"



Fukn LOL. Impeached twice you say?

CNN says "...and helping to incite of course the deadly Capitol insurrection"



Fukn LOL. If that was true, why wasn't he "impeached" last month?

Trump was impeached but not convicted. Impeachment without conviction is useless, it's more of a political process rather than legal.

[EdwardTheGreat]

- he was impeached twice. That is true. Just because you don't know what impeachment is, doesn't cease it from having happened.

- yes, he did help incite those loons. I can't help if English is not your native language.

It means he was charged with something, but it was found to be baseless and fabricated. By CNN saying "despite his impeachment....twice" they are suggesting that he was guilty of something, when it was determined that he was not.


That is lying.

[z4v4]

It means he was charged with something, but it was found to be baseless and fabricated. By CNN saying "despite his impeachment....twice" they are suggesting that he was guilty of something, when it was determined that he was not.


That is lying.

Again, you don't know what impeachment is. It is something that happens in the House. Being convicted or not in the Senate does not change the fact a president was impeached, or is your assertion that Bill Clinton was never impeached?

Here, let's simplify it for you. OJ was arrested for double-murder. He was found not-guilty at trial. That doesn't mean he was never arrested for double-murder.

[EdwardTheGreat]

Again, you don't know what impeachment is. It is something that happens in the House. Being convicted or not in the Senate does not change the fact a president was impeached, or is your assertion that Bill Clinton was never impeached?

Here, let's simplify it for you. OJ was arrested for double-murder. He was found not-guilty at trial. That doesn't mean he was never arrested for double-murder.

Yup, exactly...Trump was accused of something and it was determined that his accusers had no evidence of it. CNN was saying "despite being accused twice, and the accusations being determined to be baseless" they say "impeached twice".

It is meaningless, but the use it as a label to make it seem as if he was guilty of something. He is as innocent as a baby.

[z4v4]

Yup, exactly...Trump was accused of something and it was determined that his accusers had no evidence of it. CNN was saying "despite being accused twice, and the accusations being determined to be baseless" they say "impeached twice".

It is meaningless, but the use it as a label to make it seem as if he was guilty of something. He is as innocent as a baby.

He was impeached. Twice. That is a fact. Just because you don't understand what an impeachment is or means, does not change the fact he was impeached.

Impeachment is being formally charged with a crime. He was formally charged with a crime (impeached) and acquitted of that charge. Are you even American? How do you not know this?

[EdwardTheGreat]

He was impeached. Twice. That is a fact. Just because you don't understand what an impeachment is or means, does not change the fact he was impeached.

Impeachment is being formally charged with a crime. He was formally charged with a crime (impeached) and acquitted of that charge. Are you even American? How do you not know this?

You're saying the exact same thing that I am LOL....you are just saying it in a way that attempts to make it sound like Trump did something wrong, while I am saying the accusations were baseless, as was proven.

You are agreeing with me that he is an innocent man charged by baseless accusations, you just don't want to.

[fitnessislife]

[chaunce54]

Typical lib approach.

This:


....is the same way they treated all the video evidence of election shenanigans, then claim there was no evidence presented.

[z4v4]

You're saying the exact same thing that I am LOL....you are just saying it in a way that attempts to make it sound like Trump did something wrong, while I am saying the accusations were baseless, as was proven.

You are agreeing with me that he is an innocent man charged by baseless accusations, you just don't want to.

Again, back to OJ. Was OJ charged with murdering his wife and Goldman?

That's a question that only has a yes or no as an answer.

Answer that, and you'll realize that yes, Trump was impeached twice, and like OJ, he got off.

Like OJ, he was acquitted. It's no surprise, though, when the jurors go to meet with the defense attorneys after the prosecution makes its case that they will not find him guilty. Where in the world do jurors exchange ideas with the legal team of one side during a trial? US Congress - that's where.

[EdwardTheGreat]

Again, back to OJ. Was OJ charged with murdering his wife and Goldman?

That's a question that only has a yes or no as an answer.

Answer that, and you'll realize that yes, Trump was impeached twice, and like OJ, he got off.

Like OJ, he was acquitted. It's no surprise, though, when the jurors go to meet with the defense attorneys after the prosecution makes its case that they will not find him guilty. Where in the world do jurors exchange ideas with the legal team of one side during a trial? US Congress - that's where.

That's a lot of writing just to say "Trump is not guilty of what he was accused."

[z4v4]

That's a lot of writing just to say "Trump is not guilty of what he was accused."

Trump is guilty of what he was CHARGED (i.e., impeached) with - he just had a sympathetic jury panel like OJ did (well, not really sympathetic, but they feared for their careers. We need term limits).

[Harbinger]

Trump is guilty of what he was CHARGED (i.e., impeached) with - he just had a sympathetic jury panel like OJ did (well, not really sympathetic, but they feared for their careers. We need term limits).

Is that why they had to fabricate evidence?

[z4v4]

Is that why they had to fabricate evidence?

What was fabricated, son?

[engj]

[JoshSP1985]

(D)ifferent

[fitnessislife]

[fitnessislife]

[fitnessislife]

[N0rds]

[FatBallz]

She seems to be getting the "Trump Treatment" in the UK tabloids

[chaunce54]

She seems to be getting the "Trump Treatment" in the UK tabloids

What do you expect? This muggle waltzes in and steals the Royal Wizard away...

[Procta]

[Procta]

[fitnessislife]

You just hate to see it.

[gachase21]