|
-
12-30-2017, 09:30 PM #91
-
12-30-2017, 09:40 PM #92
-
-
12-30-2017, 09:45 PM #93
-
12-30-2017, 09:48 PM #94
-
12-30-2017, 09:53 PM #95
-
12-30-2017, 09:54 PM #96
-
-
12-30-2017, 09:55 PM #97
- Join Date: Mar 2005
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 49
- Posts: 23,107
- Rep Power: 128682
this is false
Jury sees body-cam video of Mesa officer shooting unarmed man
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...man/803368001/
A prosecutor on Thursday showed a jury video of a Mesa police officer fatally shooting an unarmed man who was on his knees after he sobbed and begged not to be shot.
-
12-30-2017, 09:57 PM #98
It actually does completely relate to your post and is evidence of why cops are justified when someone makes a movement as if reaching for a gun. Officers actually do have authority to use deadly force. If you want to call it execution thats on you but all it does is show your biased and lack of understanding of police powers
-
12-30-2017, 09:59 PM #99
-
12-30-2017, 10:00 PM #100
-
-
12-30-2017, 10:03 PM #101
Your incompetance is astounding
Heres the thing you dont realize. Its not executing people as you love to put it because it sounds scary and evil. Cops are tasked with enforcing the law and protecting the public. Part of protefting the public is using deadly force. Now cops can legally use deadlybforce when they have a fear or threat of violence that could result in serious bodily injury or death against them. That video shows why someone reaching for their waist band is a legitimate threat of SBI or death.Last edited by dhawkeye1980; 12-31-2017 at 01:09 AM.
-
12-30-2017, 11:33 PM #102
-
12-30-2017, 11:35 PM #103
-
12-30-2017, 11:48 PM #104
-
-
12-30-2017, 11:50 PM #105
-
12-30-2017, 11:56 PM #106
-
12-31-2017, 12:02 AM #107
Sigh. Its like you want to be oblivious to facts.
The differences in the scenarios of the video are inconsequential. A dude was ordered to show his hands, he refused and drew a gun and shot the cop. Shaver was ordered not to reach behind his back or he would be shot. The action of reaching behind your back when instructed not too is enough of a threat of violence that authorizes deadly force because of videos like what I have posted. The fact he does not have a gun isnt known until after the fact but because criminals have pulled out guns from waistbands when ordered not too is enough for a reasonable officer to believe the situation has risen to the use of deadly force.
You not understanding that doesnt mean chit as its been upheld in court numerous times.
-
12-31-2017, 12:19 AM #108
Nah, bro, I get the black and white thinking. Dude went for his waist, that's a good place for a gun, so derp, smoke him, regardless of the mountains of evidence (complied in 5 minutes of dealing with the suspect) that he's highly unlikely reaching for a gun. This would require critical thinking skills under duress, and many beat cops are just looking at absolutes due to fear. I get it.
-
-
12-31-2017, 12:34 AM #109
-
12-31-2017, 12:43 AM #110
-
12-31-2017, 12:56 AM #111
Don't call people anti-cop just because they don't support the killing of innocent civilians.
I support cops in most of these issues. But the trigger happy attitude is getting out of hand and costing innocent lives.
When did serve and protect become "this may be dangerous, lets just smoke the guy"?Texas crew
-
12-31-2017, 01:10 AM #112
-
-
12-31-2017, 01:11 AM #113
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.720e86d0a9b7
thats really sad, I bet the dude was like he wont really shoot me, i wont die today, then ripSuperHercules crew
cancer survivor crew
Dyslexic crew
Friend of Mr.Wilson crew
Ugly and old cell crew
Cat crew
Insomniac crew
-
12-31-2017, 01:38 AM #114
- Join Date: Oct 2006
- Location: United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 11,605
- Rep Power: 25932
Not sure how you can't see all the violence happening to civilians from bad cops and not understand why some civilians fight back. Violence doesn't get to just go one way... bad cops cause anger and distrust in our communities and everyone INCLUDING the cops will suffer.
R135
└┼┼┤ Save the Manuals!
246
-
12-31-2017, 01:45 AM #115
I don't think it's a coincidence that every explanation you get involves a very linear thought process based on protocol. If it works 99.995% of the time and when it doesn't work the guy goes to trial it's hard to really argue the system failed. dhawkeye or really 99.99% of LEOs have probably "followed protocol" a thousand plus times and never had it fail them. There is no argument you can make that is more convincing than thousands of hours of experience which I would guess is why you see most of these guys defending cops in every situation. Tbh I think there would be a lot more problems if you expected cops to be iterative problem solving geniuses.
-
12-31-2017, 01:48 AM #116
-
-
12-31-2017, 01:58 AM #117
-
12-31-2017, 02:03 AM #118
I'm not arguing like the other guy that our shooting rates should be like that of Australia or Europe. That's comparing apples to oranges like you said.
I agree we have a gang violence problem but realistically how was Daniel Shaver or some twitcher mistaken for gang members? They didn't fit the profile we can see in these videos.
The fallout from the violence should not be taken by innocent civilians. It should be more spending on police, more police training.Texas crew
-
12-31-2017, 02:17 AM #119
-
12-31-2017, 02:22 AM #120
Bookmarks