How much percentage of single women would you say are actually relationship material?

[CodyZellery]

He thinks women should be in the kitchen all day.

That's me.

Why is your rep power so low when you're a female?

[BigTimePlayer]

Laid/back and quiet is good ..speaks of confidence in self, and possible intellect / sincerity

What you believe? Whether you feel women are truly unworthy sluts, or you're just repeating that endless misc jibe of women's innate inferiority.

You can't actually get into a real relationship just by good looks ...personality counts a lot and negativity is unappealing

I suppose but it always puts me in the "he's so quiet" category with people. It can be annoying after awhile. But I can't just be really talkative all the time, it's just not me.

I don't think all women are unworthy sloots but it just seems that in a lot of their eyes most guys aren't good enough for them & only want something that most guys can't obtain.

I know it's not all about good looks but why be with a woman that isn't that physically attracted to you? You're lying if you say women don't care about looks. Did you see that video I posted in that other thread where every single woman in the video chose the Chad lookin guy for sex but chose the less attractive guy for a relationship since they think the better looking guy would possibly cheat in a relationship & don't want to be on a lower level of looks than the guy. Doesn't mean the less attractive guy does it much for her in terms of sexual appeal though.

[rawdawgg]

1%.

And 99% of those are taken.

[blackout3]

No hymen no diamond my brah. srs

Have you ever phukked a virgin or gfed one?

I guarantee you 99/100 the sex life will be garbage, not only immediately but long term too (most girls who abstain until marriage aren't exactly gonna be vixens in the sack).

The one girl that does turn into a nympho will likely get the urge to jump on the cawk carousel as soon as the hymen breaks.

You're setting unrealistic expectations, and thus setting yourself up for unhappiness and resentment when the world doesn't align with your fantasy, because it's not going to.

[TrinnieBuu]

Funny how a bunch of y'all are complaining about women this women that. Takes two to tango. The same statistics showing correlation between amount of sex partners and likelihood of divorce also applies to men.

To answer the question, probably the same number as men, society as a whole has gotten a lot more non-committal when it comes to relationships.

[LordLuck]

Funny how a bunch of y'all are complaining about women this women that. Takes two to tango. The same statistics showing correlation between amount of sex partners and likelihood of divorce also applies to men.

Ummm.. No actually the statistics show that the number of sex parteners the male has doesn't end in Divorce. Stop bull****ing.

[MBisonSon]

Out of SINGLE women?

Not a very high percentage IMO.

[CodyZellery]

Have you ever phukked a virgin or gfed one?

I guarantee you 99/100 the sex life will be garbage, not only immediately but long term too (most girls who abstain until marriage aren't exactly gonna be vixens in the sack).

The one girl that does turn into a nympho will likely get the urge to jump on the cawk carousel as soon as the hymen breaks.

You're setting unrealistic expectations, and thus setting yourself up for unhappiness and resentment when the world doesn't align with your fantasy, because it's not going to.

[TrinnieBuu]

Ummm.. No actually the statistics show that the number of sex parteners the male has doesn't end in Divorce. Stop bull****ing.

I am having trouble understanding your sentence. But to respond to what I think you just said. The only study that shows # of sex partners vs likelihood of divorce, was done by one guy at University of Utah, he never even looked into the same angle for men, it was only done to statistics regarding women (I won't even get into how inherently biased that is for a published study). It actually shows that women that had 2 premarital partners and 10+ have the highest rate of divorce (i.e. 3-9 partners .. actually lower divorce rate than 2 partners, go figure). Statistically, men have more sex partners than women prior to their first marriage (easily verifiable, please google). So no, your claim of men with more sex partners are less likely to get divorced is not true, it hasn't been surveyed yet.

[daniasadz]

I assure you, the percentage is the same for men. And I agree, it would be a very small percentage.

It was very tough business finding a suitable masculine male for me to marry. I came across dude after dude who just didn't know what it means to be a man.

BRB redpilled
BRB PUA garbage that didn't work
BRB No sense of responsibility, personal growth or strife
BRB selfish chitheads
BRB BRB BRB

Spat a bitch in the face 2015.
Slapped a bitch in the face 2016.

Masculine enough? Just kidding.
That really happened, though.

[daniasadz]

Like 10%

Probably.

[Mr Beer]

It's 0%. There, now that's confirmed your lives are doomed, you can relax and continue your never ending FA circle jerk, *******s.

[BigTimePlayer]

I am having trouble understanding your sentence. But to respond to what I think you just said. The only study that shows # of sex partners vs likelihood of divorce, was done by one guy at University of Utah, he never even looked into the same angle for men, it was only done to statistics regarding women (I won't even get into how inherently biased that is for a published study). Statistically, men have more sex partners than women prior to their first marriage (easily verifiable, please google). So no, your claim of men with more sex partners are less likely to get divorced is not true, it hasn't been surveyed yet.

When were any of these studies even done? Was it pre social media & before Tinder/Bumble or after? That is very important in terms of these statistics. Things have changed drastically in the past 5-10 years.

[Kewbrah]

Doesn't need a big %

You only need one perfect one out of about 3.5 billion of them.

[BigTimePlayer]

Doesn't need a big %

You only need one perfect one out of about 3.5 billion of them.

Yeah, but how many think they're perfect for each other? A woman might think she's perfect for a guy but he's not attracted to her, or a guy might think he's perfect for the woman & really like her but she doesn't like him back for whatever reason.

[TrinnieBuu]

It was published in 2016 looking at data from 1970 to 2013. I'm not sure how long ago Tinder became a thing, but this should include at least a few years of data after online-dating became popular.

[BigTimePlayer]

It was published in 2016 looking at data from 1970 to 2013. I'm not sure how long ago Tinder became a thing, but this should include at least a few years of data after online-dating became popular.

Data from back in all those years isn't relevant to how things are today though. It's a completely different world now. I guarantee if you go by the past 5-10 years only than it would show women have more or about the same amount of sex partners before marriage then men on average. As for sex partners as it pertains to divorces who really knows. I do think promiscuous people though would have a way more difficult time being in a marriage than ones that are not.

[TrinnieBuu]

Data from back in all those years isn't relevant to how things are today though. It's a completely different world now. I guarantee if you go by the past 5-10 years only than it would show women have more or about the same amount of sex partners before marriage then men on average. As for sex partners as it pertains to divorces who really knows. I do think promiscuous people though would have a way more difficult time being in a marriage than ones that are not.

Loving how nerdy this conversation has gotten btw. But per the CDC, from 2011-2013, median number for men is 6.6 and women is 4.3. With 21.8% of men having more than 15 partners and 10.6% for women.

I will concede though that women's median partner has gone up in the last 10 years (3.8 to the latest 4.3) while men's stayed the same.

[BigTimePlayer]

Loving how nerdy this conversation has gotten btw. But per the CDC, from 2011-2013, median number for men is 6.6 and women is 4.3. With 21.8% of men having more than 15 partners and 10.6% for women.

I will concede though that women's median partner has gone up in the last 10 years (3.8 to the latest 4.3) while men's stayed the same.

And it will probably keep rising as more & more men are cast aside because women's standards have been going up to the point where a big percentage of men aren't seen as good enough. I don't exactly agree with the whole 80/20 thing, but there's a fairly large percentage of men that aren't getting any success with women at all. While a lot of women are going after the same men. Online dating/social media has made women much more into sex & they realize they can get it easily when average/below average women can get it with guys above their league. But the issue is their ego gets ridiculous to the point that those same women think they're on those guys level when they were just used for a quick lay. Than there's a lot of men that are desperate to the point where they'll settle with anything they can get sex or relationship wise.

[US_Ranger]

If I was a woman and the misc posters who were men were the sample size, I'd say about 5-10% of them were date material.

[Konrai]

Except it's not even close to the same for men, you only believe that because as a women you are only filtering that top 20 % or less and every other guy is invisible.

I would say it's probably about the same for men and women if we are talking about serious relationships leading to a potential marriage. Look into the world, it's becoming more mainstream for men and women to completely disregard serious relationships and just have fun because there is to much 'risk' involved, the sad thing is the media even promotes this way of thinking in the west.

Now if you are just talking about will a woman on average date x,y,z male in the west, then yes ill agree that women do filter a bit more but I don't blame them. If anything the tables have just turned, and instead of the old school pump and dump sob story that used to go around women are now adapting to the lifestyle almost on the same level men have(you probably have noticed this via media). Of course throw in online dating, media trends and social networking, a lot more women have just realized the 'power' they actually have when it comes to dating, so I'd say women have definitely become more picky but mostly for the wrong reasons, as I don't feel what the media is pushing women to do is actually helpful to them finding a quality partner.

After all if you look around in the west primarily, many women's standards(mens as well) have gone way up, but when you actually observe what they are looking for, it's usually superficial stuff that isn't actually beneficial to building a healthy relationship at all.

[DanielleGreen]

If I was a woman and the misc posters who were men were the sample size, I'd say about 5-10% of them were date material.

Rep

[Nedo]

This fact will scare you so just get out there and start looking for her.

[MHannibal]

If I was a woman I'd be swimming in dicks, a good man for a relationship though? Very hard to find I imagine. Both sexes have their downsides OP, stop being a little bitch and improve on what you have.

[Ittoryu]

Very low, and if there are, likely taken. If you do decide to chase the thankless marathon known as marriage, I'd encourage you to look for women outside the west... I'd say odds are better in countries where feminism hasn't hit so hard.

And if that's not an option, just enjoy the single life man. Plenty of sloots to go around now for everyone... and you don't even have to commit to them... Never has there been so much abundance of pussy and you guys want to commit to one. For what? Lovey dovey ideals that don't apply in this day and age?

Have you ever phukked a virgin or gfed one?

I guarantee you 99/100 the sex life will be garbage, not only immediately but long term too (most girls who abstain until marriage aren't exactly gonna be vixens in the sack).

The one girl that does turn into a nympho will likely get the urge to jump on the cawk carousel as soon as the hymen breaks.

You're setting unrealistic expectations, and thus setting yourself up for unhappiness and resentment when the world doesn't align with your fantasy, because it's not going to.

If I were interested in getting married (I'm not), a good sex life wouldn't be my priority in finding a marriage partner anyway. There are way too many other factors that I'd take over a girl who loves to get freaky. I've had my fair share of fun, and what I'd be more interested in is a woman who can raise my kids right; Put simply, while nymphos are extremely fun to date and hang around, I don't think they are very suitable for raising children or marriage, at least in my opinion. Trading a good sex life for a mediocre sex life and a good mother would be a good trade-off if I were looking to head down that path. But that's just me... I'm sure many will disagree.

[azakdan2682]

How azakdan? I've bled and cried a hundred million tears, i've forgotten more then half of you have ever learned, eugenics is the only way to a successful relationship pls respond

Reread your post, you sound like a pyschotic christian woman who thinks they are god.

[azakdan2682]

I would say it's probably about the same for men and women if we are talking about serious relationships leading to a potential marriage. Look into the world, it's becoming more mainstream for men and women to completely disregard serious relationships and just have fun because there is to much 'risk' involved, the sad thing is the media even promotes this way of thinking in the west.

Now if you are just talking about will a woman on average date x,y,z male in the west, then yes ill agree that women do filter a bit more but I don't blame them. If anything the tables have just turned, and instead of the old school pump and dump sob story that used to go around women are now adapting to the lifestyle almost on the same level men have(you probably have noticed this via media). Of course throw in online dating, media trends and social networking, a lot more women have just realized the 'power' they actually have when it comes to dating, so I'd say women have definitely become more picky but mostly for the wrong reasons, as I don't feel what the media is pushing women to do is actually helpful to them finding a quality partner.

After all if you look around in the west primarily, many women's standards(mens as well) have gone way up, but when you actually observe what they are looking for, it's usually superficial stuff that isn't actually beneficial to building a healthy relationship at all.

It is always superficial. If ppl don't find someone attractive they just blame something else about them that likely isn't even true or blown way out of proportion to sound less shallow.

[US_Ranger]

It is always superficial. If ppl don't find someone attractive they just blame something else about them that likely isn't even true or blown way out of proportion to sound less shallow.

Except sometimes it has nothing to do with attractiveness and everything to do with their values as a person. I've dated extremely attractive women before and I doubt I would again for the reason that they're completely disconnected from reality. It has nothing to do with how attractive they are and everything to do with their qualities as a person.

I've also had women break up with me that found me attractive because there was probably something they didn't like.

Not everything has to do with attractiveness or your stupid fcking hairline.

[azakdan2682]

Loving how nerdy this conversation has gotten btw. But per the CDC, from 2011-2013, median number for men is 6.6 and women is 4.3. With 21.8% of men having more than 15 partners and 10.6% for women.

I will concede though that women's median partner has gone up in the last 10 years (3.8 to the latest 4.3) while men's stayed the same.

lol how are these stastics derived? By taking fuking surveys on amount of sex partners. You think people, especially women answer that honestly? For fuks sake, no. They lie about it in a default manner, because they lie about it to themselves too. Just exp life and you will see how much the dating world has changed and how much women cheat and sleep around.


Statistics are worthless and ppl can always skew it to their agenda.

[azakdan2682]

Except sometimes it has nothing to do with attractiveness and everything to do with their values as a person. I've dated extremely attractive women before and I doubt I would again for the reason that they're completely disconnected from reality. It has nothing to do with how attractive they are and everything to do with their qualities as a person.

I've also had women break up with me that found me attractive because there was probably something they didn't like.

Not everything has to do with attractiveness or your stupid fcking hairline.

Yes but you did date them and found out along the path that they were not LTR material. They met basic minimum criteria looks, where many guys don't. If you don't get the interview, you will not get the job. I'm talking about the initial phase, if you don't break the looks threshold, then it will not go anywhere, that's where the superficiality comes in.