Trump: Assad "crossed alot of lines for me", vows policy change

[Kane_89]

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ria/100066914/

WASHINGTON — President Trump opened a news conference with a key Middle East ally Wednesday by denouncing this week's chemical attack in Syria and suggesting his administration would develop a new policy toward Bashar al-Assad's government.

At a Rose Garden news conference, Trump accused the Assad government of being behind the "horrific" attack that targeted "women, small children, and even beautiful little babies."

The attack, Trump said, "crossed a lot of lines for me."

"These heinous actions by the Assad regime cannot be tolerated," Trump said at the conference with Jordan's King Abdullah, whom Trump called a "great warrior."

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...anity-n2309302

"That crosses many many lines, beyond a red line."

Here we go again with the crossing of lines...He just boxed himself into taking out Assad, If he doesnt take action, he will look like Obama lol

[JoshSP1985]

Ron Paul calling this a false flag.

[tightteeshirt]

trump giving a response that sounds just like Obama or Jeb bush or Hillary would give. and puppet nikki haley in the UN emergency meeting today said that if other countries decide not to take cooperative action together on this then the US will go it alone. looks like we're headed to Syria boyos.



certain groups won't rest until Assad is gone. have we not learned from iraq? from libya?

[drLihp]

in b4 trumpers become anti assad now

[Noliberals4]

Ready for another war for Israel? So sick of that country.

Trump was a mistake. He's more globalist than Clinton. How dare you people vote for him.

[Procta]

I dont think Trump drew any lines in the sand to anyone




approx 5 years ago....

[tightteeshirt]

thats more like the trump I voted for

[Noliberals4]

thats more like the trump I voted for

Same.

But the neocons got him now. Oh well. Ready to go to more wars for Israel? Trump voters should be the first ones drafted (and yes, I voted for Trump, and no, I won't go).

[allianc3]

Why can't Assad just stick to conventional weapons, goddamit.

We don't belong fighting other counties civil wars but when they start using chemical weapons we get dragged into it.

What good is the UN if they sit on the sidelines dithering.

[JoshSP1985]

Why can't Assad just stick to conventional weapons, goddamit.

We don't belong fighting other counties civil wars but when they start using chemical weapons we get dragged into it.

What good is the UN if they sit on the sidelines dithering.

This, if the UN wants to do something go for it. Problem is we lead that **** too.

[ZzBrahh]

trump giving a response that sounds just like Obama or Jeb bush or Hillary would give. and puppet nikki haley in the UN emergency meeting today said that if other countries decide not to take cooperative action together on this then the US will go it alone. looks like we're headed to Syria boyos.



certain groups won't rest until Assad is gone. have we not learned from iraq? from libya?

havented posted in a few months, but logged in just to say this sounds like iraq all over again with Saddam and the babies which turned out to be A LIFE , (google and youtube)


trump is turning into a neo-con , we have no fight in syria, we must let assad stay and remain in control or isis will take over just like in every other country we destablized in the middle east

[Procta]

What good is the UN if they sit on the sidelines dithering.

best question

[Noliberals4]

Why can't Assad just stick to conventional weapons, goddamit.

We don't belong fighting other counties civil wars but when they start using chemical weapons we get dragged into it.

What good is the UN if they sit on the sidelines dithering.

IT'S A FALSE FLAG.

Neocons were throwing a HUGE fit when Trump said let Assad's fate be left up to Syria. And now this?

If Trump changes that policy, then America is done for. We lost. The globalists won.

[jtaylor2010]

Same.

But the neocons got him now. Oh well. Ready to go to more wars for Israel? Trump voters should be the first ones drafted (and yes, I voted for Trump, and no, I won't go).

Just lmao if you think we wouldn't have been doing this if Clinton got elected(and yes, you voted for Clinton). That being said I'll be really disappointed if we go the "overthrow the dictator and hope for the best" route in Syria. Would be a huge blow to Trump's credibility imho.

[jtaylor2010]

best question

They're good for sucking money out of America.

[Noliberals4]

Just lmao if you think we wouldn't have been doing this if Clinton got elected(and yes, you voted for Clinton). That being said I'll be really disappointed if we go the "overthrow the dictator and hope for the best" route in Syria. Would be a huge blow to Trump's credibility imho.

I voted for Trump with the small hope he wouldn't go full neocon. His AIPAC speech should have been a huge wake up call.

The fact you're saying Clinton would have done this doesn't ring alarm bells in your brain?

[allianc3]

This, if the UN wants to do something go for it. Problem is we lead that **** too.

Why the fuk can't we just diplomatically disarm him of his chemical weapons and leave Syria the fuk alone?

If a country wants to shell the crap out of themselves we should let them, I agree chemical weapons cross a line which is why the UN should lead the diplomatic relations only to disarm Assad of chemical weapons.

[ZzBrahh]

Just lmao if you think we wouldn't have been doing this if Clinton got elected(and yes, you voted for Clinton). That being said I'll be really disappointed if we go the "overthrow the dictator and hope for the best" route in Syria. Would be a huge blow to Trump's credibility imho.

its over for him, if he does this. the freedom caucus is much more effective in leading america, one of there members will be the next GOP nominee

[cashinout]

Why the fuk can't we just diplomatically disarm him of his chemical weapons and leave Syria the fuk alone?

If a country wants to shell the crap out of themselves we should let them, I agree chemical weapons cross a line which is why the UN should lead the diplomatic relations only to disarm Assad of chemical weapons.

This is not about Syria, it's the neocons/democrats vs Russia

[allianc3]

This is not about Syria, it's the neocons/democrats vs Russia

Proxy wars are such horsechit.

[Noliberals4]

This is not about Syria, it's the neocons/democrats vs Russia

It's about Syria.

According to the PNAC, 2 countries needed to be toppled - Iraq and Syria.

[cashinout]

Proxy wars are such horsechit.

agreed

this whole chemical attack sounds an awful lot like "weapons of mass destruction" to me

[primetime32]

in b4 trumpers become anti assad now

When were "Trumpers" pro Assad. Pretty sure every Trump Supporter would like to see Assad dead and out of power, but don't want American Troops to die in the process. Trump came into office with a clean slate on Russia etc.., as things evolve his positions will evolve.

Obummer swore he would close Gitmo, eight years later we still have Gitmo? Why? Because he is a liar? Nah. Most likely he was faced with some realizations that he was not aware of prior to taking office.

[JoshSP1985]

Why the fuk can't we just diplomatically disarm him of his chemical weapons and leave Syria the fuk alone?

If a country wants to shell the crap out of themselves we should let them, I agree chemical weapons cross a line which is why the UN should lead the diplomatic relations only to disarm Assad of chemical weapons.

I don't know how you would do this logistically. Roll UN inspectors (who I assume ISIS would attack) into Syria and attempt to find and remove chemical weapons?

[JoshSP1985]

Why the fuk can't we just diplomatically disarm him of his chemical weapons and leave Syria the fuk alone?

If a country wants to shell the crap out of themselves we should let them, I agree chemical weapons cross a line which is why the UN should lead the diplomatic relations only to disarm Assad of chemical weapons.

I don't know how you would do this logistically. Roll UN inspectors (who I assume ISIS would attack) into Syria and attempt to find and remove chemical weapons?

[keyboardworkout]

It makes absolutely no sense for Assad to order a chemical attack.

I'm not buying the narrative.

I had high hopes for Trump on Syria.

[Noliberals4]

When were "Trumpers" pro Assad. Pretty sure every Trump Supporter would like to see Assad dead and out of power, but don't want American Troops to die in the process. Trump came into office with a clean slate on Russia etc.., as things evolve his positions will evolve.

Obummer swore he would close Gitmo, eight years later we still have Gitmo? Why? Because he is a liar? Nah. Most likely he was faced with some realizations that he was not aware of prior to taking office.

Mr. Trump shrugged at calls to use force against Mr. Assad’s government and endorsed Russia’s support of the Syrian leader.

“You have Russia that’s now there. Russia’s on the side of Assad, and Russia wants to get rid of ISIS as much as we do, if not more, because they don’t want them coming into Russia,” Mr. Trump said in a September 2015 interview with CNN. “Let Syria and ISIS fight. Why do we care?”

In a May 2016 interview on MSNBC, Mr. Trump said the United States had “bigger problems than Assad.” He added, “I would have stayed out of Syria and wouldn’t have fought so much for Assad, against Assad.”

So emphatic was Mr. Trump’s stance on Syria that he disavowed the stance of his own running mate. After the October 2016 vice-presidential debate, when Mike Pence, then governor of Indiana, backed strikes against Mr. Assad, Mr. Trump stated, “I disagree.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/u...ria-obama.html

[JoshSP1985]

Chem weapons change everything, public opinion shifts drastically when they're involved. That's why this false flag was used, someone is attempting to force Trump's hand.

[beowulf10]

This is not about Syria, it's the neocons/democrats vs Russia

I think it's as simple as Trump being a human being and he just doesn't like little kids getting massacred.

[tightteeshirt]

ron paul gets it