Anyone have/use the Life Fitness G3? I would like to eventually get a lat pulldown/low row selectorized setup and the fact that this one has additional pulleys for chest/shoulder exercises seems to be pretty useful and it is compact enough to fit in the open space in my garage. That said, I am a bit skeptical since it is described as a "home gym" setup that it is going to not feel adequate compared to a standard lat pulldown/low row setup. What I read said you can get a 50lb add on so with a 210lb weight stack I figure that will probably be adequate for my use.
|
-
05-15-2018, 10:27 AM #301
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 1,444
- Rep Power: 5571
-
05-21-2018, 05:16 PM #302
HenryMaag,
I don’t even know what to respond first to of what you wrote. I agree, our writings here to each other are nothing personal, just sharing ideas. I like Arthur Jones Nautilus. It is not the only company I like but their equipment just so happens to be, for the most part, the best for my muscle building goals. I own other brands but in total those other brands make up less than 10% of my equipment holdings.
Therefore, I don’t think I have blinders on to the world. A question comes to mind from something you wrote. What could ever possess you to say that a muscle reaches its peak resistance capacity when ONLY 50% of its fibers are stimulated/activated into contraction???
Seriously review your answer to this question before posting, please.
YDM
-
05-22-2018, 05:50 AM #303
-
05-22-2018, 11:42 AM #304
HealthNutMD, can you give your feelings on the comparison of the Strive plate loaded bicep and the Atlantis plate loaded bicep? I have priced out both, and they are relatively similar in that regard. Having used them both, I'm interested in your thoughts. You had them both on the top tier list, so perhaps it's a wash for you since they do things a bit differently.
-
-
05-22-2018, 06:09 PM #305
They are both great bicep machines, both truly deserving to be in any gym. The strive is better in the sense that you can play with the strength curve a ton. The Atlantis has the best dual grip positions I have ever used. The angle of the hammer grip portion is outstanding. I kept both of those machines because each offerred something unique and outstanding.
I ended up selling both once I picked up the Power-Lift because in an overall sense, it was the best preacher curl bicep I have used, period. Absolutely amazing preacher curl and still my overall #1. It's a bonus that it is selectorized... although I dont use selectorized as judging criteria. Certainly, all things being absolutely equal, I'll take selectorized, assuming the weight stack is sufficient.
The Power-Lift has great dual grips as well, essentially equal to the Atlantis. There is a slight flaring of the Atlantis hammer grip, which I like slightly better than the straight hammer grip of the power-lift, but they are both great, so no issue at all. It's too bad the Strive/Prime selectorized is not as good as any of the above.{}---{} Best of the Best Machines and Free Weights Crew #1 {}---{}
MXA------MEDX Avenger Crew #2------MXA
[]---[] Ivanko Barbell Crew #12 []---[]
-
05-22-2018, 07:22 PM #306
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,270
- Rep Power: 377786
I have had a Rogers Pendulum 5-way neck and sold it. Once owned an Avenger 4-way neck and traded it. Kinda regret letting the Avenger go. But, equipment just comes to me. I found this Dynamic Fitness & Strength 4-way neck in "same as new" condition from the boys over at Roush Fenway racing in Charlotte. Obvious Avenger copy with a couple of improvements. This is the first Dynamic 4-way neck that I have seen become available on the used market.
Bumper type plate storage saves space over the Avenger type plate storage.
Adjustable foot rest height positioning. Adjusts like a power rack j-hook. Foot pedal pop pin seat height adjustment. The double grip handle flips up if the user chooses to hold & anchor there instead of using two of the other 4 handles.
Laser cut selector numbers on the torso pad positioning.
Last edited by deadwoodgregg; 05-23-2018 at 02:40 AM.
[]---[] Equipment crew member #51 []---[]
-
05-22-2018, 09:00 PM #307
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Location: Huntington Beach, California, United States
- Age: 67
- Posts: 270
- Rep Power: 4668
ydmora,
Well, where did I say that a "muscle reaches its peak resistance capacity when only 50% of its fibers are stimulated/activated into contraction"??? My own ability to reason tells me "that a 'maximum' contractile force is applied when a 'maximum' number of muscle 'fibers are stimulated/activated into contraction". If this is what you are trying to say, then we are in agreement.
Even if you were to convince me that Arthur Jone's theory on muscular contraction (that muscles applied maximum contractile force only in their most contracted positions) was true or valid, it still would not answer the practical reality, that, statistically (that is, taking a large sector of the human population) this theory does not fit the observations. Muscle-building machines are designed to be used by people. I assume that Arthur's objective in building machines for sale was, just like mine, to provide end users with a practical means to increase their muscle size/strength (force applying capabilities), not to test his theories.
I will admit, I don't know all human bodies, ...I am not a kinesiologist, ...I have never isolated a human muscle and attached its two ends to a force gage: I base the things that I say and share with others only on my own observations on the macro level (incidentally, the level that we work out on). When I say that people can pull more weight in a pulldown or rowing movement when the arms are fully extended versus progressively less weight as the driving muscles (the lattisimus dorsi and bicep muscles) move toward contraction, this is simply based on my observations of myself and others. If everyone that I see can pull more weight at the beginning of a pulldown or rowing movement and progressively less as the movement continues, I feel safe in saying (and sharing) that a pulldown or row machine should be designed to apply progressively less weight as the movement is performed (this is simply a classic scientific approach). I might point out that Falloffguy has apparently come to the same observations as I have, and even points out that 'most people with any sense do' too.
He (Falloffguy) apparently has heard from 'several people associated with Nautilus that Arthur purposefully ramped up the resistance at the end of the movement because he knew that trainees were going to use excessively high rates of speed'. If this is the case (and they simply weren't making an excuse for what they also felt was incorrect), then I would be in agreement with Arthur, because, statistically, I have observed that the more ballistically a movement is performed, the more the load should shift toward the end of the movement. ...I will acknowledge that if someone is training ballistically (explosively) that Arthur's vintage Nautilus machines may feel pretty good (at least the force application profiles - as I don't feel that the padding on most of those machines was very substantial - and, obviously, the relatively very high friction of his force-transmitting mechanisms would not be conductive to ballistic training).
Unfortunately, if what Falloffguy says is true (and I'm sure that you could confirm it, being a Nautilus guy), that Arthur says to "move slower if in doubt as to the speed of motion used"; then, given his own instructions as to how his machines are to be used, he, no doubt in my mind, mis-designed his machines force-application profiles (which can be statistically confirmed through observations of people using his vintage machines).
Look, if you like his vintage machines, and they work for you, then, by all means buy and collect them. At a minimum, you will possess a collection of machines which 'statistically' have been accepted by the muscle-building world as the classic fore-runners of the industry (Arthur obviously 'beat me to the punch').
You seem to me to be well educated, with a good knowledge of the industry (you actually own multiple brands of machines - which makes me curious what other brands you own? and how you feel they stack up with your Nautilus machines?).
I actually hope that some day you get to try one of my machines. My machines are actually pretty good at speaking for themselves; I think, perhaps, I tend to rub people wrong.
-
05-22-2018, 09:46 PM #308
-
-
05-22-2018, 11:00 PM #309
Nothing to be nervous about. Another added bonus that the power lift preacher offere is pre-stretch adjustment. The power-lift preacher is loved by many here. Absolutely amazing to everyone who has used it. So much so that I sold the Strive and the Atlantis.
{}---{} Best of the Best Machines and Free Weights Crew #1 {}---{}
MXA------MEDX Avenger Crew #2------MXA
[]---[] Ivanko Barbell Crew #12 []---[]
-
05-22-2018, 11:06 PM #310
-
05-23-2018, 06:18 AM #311
-
05-23-2018, 05:16 PM #312
-
-
05-24-2018, 10:35 AM #313
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Boulder, Colorado, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 598
- Rep Power: 7385
For anyone coming through the Denver area, we'll have a selection of Panatta pieces on display by late August/early Sept. The selection of what we will have on display was greatly helped by you all here (especially Chris), and confirmed when I got to test much of it myself at FIBO, so thanks for the info. I was convinced there that the equipment is worth promoting, so we set up the distributor agreement last month and finalized our showroom order.
Fit Evo Line:
1FE200 - Adjustable Back Extension
1FE214 - Abdominial Isolator
1FE056 - Alternate Arm Curl
1FE067 - Abdominal Crunch
1FE094 - Master Gluteus
1FE095 - Horizontal Leg Press Dual System
Freeweight HP:
1HP122 - Power Smith Dual System Upper
1HP503 - High Row
1HP504A - Super Rowing Plus
1HP525 - Deltoid Press, sliding seat version
1HP537 Super Horizontal Bench Press
1HP583 - Leg Press Bridge
Monolith Line:
1MTH081 - Leg Extension
SEC Line:
1SC082 - Leg Curl
1SC115HLP - Jungle Machine HLP
Plus a display showing available colors and designs of steel and padding.
Nothing is on our website yet, we're working on a few things, but we're on Panatta's site.Last edited by dukenukem7777; 05-24-2018 at 11:20 AM. Reason: swapped a word
www.repfitness.com - Gym equipment manufacturer.
-
05-24-2018, 10:46 AM #314
That's great news... I was supposed to go to FIBO this year but couldn't make it.
The free weight Ab crunch is significantly superior to any of the selectorized versions. It doesn't have the convenience of selectorized, but it is superior. They cant quite capture the magic of the plate loaded version in their selectorized version.
The Monolith leg extension is a great choice.
I havent tried the master gluteus yet, but the 3 angle choices is a first in the industry, very cool.
That's great you will be the first to get the dual upper smith machine. I won't get to demo it until Aug/Sept.
I wish you could pick up that custom selectorized lat pulldown... that's truly something special...Last edited by HealthNutMD; 05-24-2018 at 10:52 AM.
{}---{} Best of the Best Machines and Free Weights Crew #1 {}---{}
MXA------MEDX Avenger Crew #2------MXA
[]---[] Ivanko Barbell Crew #12 []---[]
-
05-24-2018, 11:19 AM #315
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Boulder, Colorado, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 598
- Rep Power: 7385
-
05-24-2018, 11:22 AM #316
It is not... I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I reccomend changing your order to get the plate loaded version. It is not close. Trust me, I tried the monolith Ab as well as the Fit Evo. It's really not close, not at all.
The magic is only found in the plate loaded version. Maybe someday they can get a selectorized version as good, but it simply is NOT close at all.{}---{} Best of the Best Machines and Free Weights Crew #1 {}---{}
MXA------MEDX Avenger Crew #2------MXA
[]---[] Ivanko Barbell Crew #12 []---[]
-
-
05-24-2018, 11:38 AM #317
-
05-24-2018, 06:53 PM #318
HealthnutMD, i have another question. And Duke, will call you tomorrow about pricing an order. HealthnutMD, I am down to deciding on a bench between the Panatta super horizontal and the Panatta vertical chest press. I haven't done chest in a decade aside from pushups, and that from nagging should injuries from shoddy spotting in my youth. But, i think with the right motion I can work some form of bench back into my life. Which of the two do you think is best suited for more limited range of motion from prior rotator injuries?
-
05-25-2018, 04:09 AM #319
HenryMaag,
I believe we are in agreement, without knowing it. Understand that, generally speaking, the more isolated a movement is (i.e. permitting circular movement around one pivot point) then one can observe a given muscle respond as i have described (i.e. getting stronger as it recruits muscle fibers). In the case of front grip lat pulldowns or behind the neck lat pulldowns, several muscle groups are activated and one should not mistaken the starting position/ending position performance of these exercises as descriptive of the strength pattern of the individual muscles that contribute to the performance of the exercise. What science has taught us about muscles holds true, and Arthur Jones was correct in his cam profiles (generally speaking). Science has also taught us that not all human beings will respond the same in muscular contraction. For example, the nervous system plays a role and some people have greater neuromuscular contractile capacity then others. First Generation Nautilus Cams, seem to have been made for human beings that perform in the upper third standard deviations (based on a bell shaped curve 🛎 distribution analysis). Next Generation Nautilus Equipment seems to have been made for middle third standard deviations. MEDX equipment cams were oriented towards all those performing in the 50th percentile or below. I choose acquisitions from the above mostly based on such an analysis of my muscular performance.
I tend not to like plate loaded equipment because it causes time to be wasted when switching poundages (i.e. this is bad for those who know that Arthur Jones HIT protocol is the way to go). Remember, Arthur first created a protocol for exercise then he created machines that would serve that protocol well. You could still use his protocol with free weights. I have other brands too that strictly allow me to implement his protocol.
YDM
-
05-25-2018, 08:45 AM #320
Wow, that's a tough choice... Both of those machines are better than anything else ever made. I'd never part with either, there is nothing comparable.
Both machines are super easy on the rotator cuff, magical movement path and convergence.
Any chance you can come to Ft Lauderdale for a demo? Otherwise you could go to Denver or to a Panatta dealer that is closest to you...{}---{} Best of the Best Machines and Free Weights Crew #1 {}---{}
MXA------MEDX Avenger Crew #2------MXA
[]---[] Ivanko Barbell Crew #12 []---[]
-
-
05-25-2018, 09:08 AM #321
I wish, but I'm in Northern VA, and the closest dealer is about 4 hours away in NJ. Amazingly and unfortunately, I'm plunking down a big chunk of change on machines that i won't get the chance to demo based on recommendation from some nut I've never met on a messageboard. BUT, i glean from what I'm reading that you truly know your stuff, so I'm trusting my instinct on trusting you. You should really get a commission on this order.
-
05-25-2018, 09:12 AM #322
There is no money to be made here, it's all about finding the best gym equipment we can.
The next step will be making my own, which I'd like to do next. Just need to get situated in a new house, which is looking like it may be 2 years if I go new construction.{}---{} Best of the Best Machines and Free Weights Crew #1 {}---{}
MXA------MEDX Avenger Crew #2------MXA
[]---[] Ivanko Barbell Crew #12 []---[]
-
05-25-2018, 11:24 AM #323
-
05-25-2018, 11:40 AM #324
I think if there was one weight machine I could have in my house never mind that I do not have the space nor the inclination to acquire machines, I would go for the Hammer Strength Iso-Lateral Chest/Back, a combination of High Row and Chest Press machine two in one. This is a single machine that had two seats on it so you could do either bench press or a high row. The leverage angles and resulting feel of it are absolutely superb for both exercises. I have never liked machines for exercises ever besides using cable crossovers, I wouldn't mind a cable crossover as well, but this was such a great machine, especially the high row portion. One thing that was nice was you didn't have to unload/load two machines if you are doing a push/pull workout day. It always left me feeling very symmetrical anterior/posterior.
Hammer Strength Plate-Loaded Iso-Lateral Chest Back-1000x1000.jpg
-
-
05-25-2018, 11:46 AM #325
-
05-25-2018, 03:22 PM #326
-
05-25-2018, 03:25 PM #327
If your interested I looking to move my Panatta vertical chest press. I had it delivered about 6 months and it's in brand new condition (only home use) white frame, black movement arms and black leather padding. I also have an Panatta plate load inclined flight machine that I'm also looking to move. Both excellent machines I just decided not open a personal training center that I was planning to do for a few years now, so I'm downsizing my home gym.
-
05-25-2018, 03:31 PM #328
For the right price I might be willing to move my Panatta vertical chest. I had it delivered about 6 months ago. Only home use so it's in brand new condition. White frame, black movement arms, black leather padding. I had been thinking for a few years now about opening up a personal training center but I'm way too busy in my career and feel like I'm getting too old to start a new project. So I'm looking to downsize my homegym.
-
-
05-25-2018, 03:47 PM #329
[QUOTE=ampire;1552326241]I think if there was one weight machine I could have in my house never mind that I do not have the space nor the inclination to acquire machines, I would go for the Hammer Strength Iso-Lateral Chest/Back, a combination of High Row and Chest Press machine two in one. This is a single machine that had two seats on it so you could do either bench press or a high row. The leverage angles and resulting feel of it are absolutely superb for both exercises. I have never liked machines for exercises ever besides using cable crossovers, I wouldn't mind a cable crossover as well, but this was such a great machine, especially the high row portion. One thing that was nice was you didn't have to unload/load two machines if you are doing a push/pull workout day. It always left me feeling very symmetrical anterior/posterior.
Hey,
I had a Hammer PL incline machine and front lat pulldown. I sold them both in favor of this dual machine (back/chest) machine that I pick up from a trainer in Beverly Hills. I found it to be a bad choice for me at least. The hammer combo incline portion is not converging like the hammer incline press. I ended up selling it and getting another hammer incline, and a separate panatta lat pulldown.
-
05-25-2018, 04:12 PM #330
Similar Threads
-
Cost No Object Machines and Free Weights, the Best of the Best
By HealthNutMD in forum Workout EquipmentReplies: 8030Last Post: 03-27-2017, 06:47 AM
Bookmarks