That's definitely a good choice.
|
-
03-28-2024, 11:38 PM #5191
-
03-29-2024, 11:45 AM #5192
-
-
03-29-2024, 11:47 AM #5193
-
03-29-2024, 11:50 AM #5194
-
04-13-2024, 03:16 PM #5195
-
04-13-2024, 07:39 PM #5196
-
-
04-14-2024, 07:42 AM #5197
-
04-14-2024, 08:38 AM #5198
-
04-15-2024, 06:56 AM #5199
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 58
- Posts: 1,929
- Rep Power: 25726
This is the IronMaster Belt Squat Attachment. I've had this for a couple of weeks now and have been using it on every leg day. I've never even used a belt squat before so I have nothing to compare it to. I figured for the $150 introductory price I could at least try it. I bought the IronMaster belt also for $50, if I ever decide to get a dedicated belt squat I'll at least have a belt. I doubt I'd ever be able to sell it if I didn't like it, not much of an IronMaster 2000 used market around me. So far I have to say I really like it. The movement feels great, I feel it much higher up on my quads than I do normal barbell squats (I'm a high bar just above parallel squatter). I've been doing cable squats (Brignole) when I want to keep the load off my spine. I've enjoyed them but always felt like I'm sacrificing weight/load on the movement. I can go much heavier obviously on the belt squat without worrying about me trying to keep my balance.
The pivot point attaches to the back frame of the IM 2000 and connects with a pin to allow it to pivot. You start from the top position and just twist the barbell to engage/lock or disengage/unlock the safety pins/stops of the bar. The movement is very smooth, it does get a little harder to twist the barbell to lock/unlock under heavier load, so far I've only gotten up to 365lbs total. It's rated up to 600lbs. I doubt that will become an issue for me. For the small amount of space this takes up it's a winner for me. I love the movement and it's really not an ordeal at all to set up.
"It is my own fault for replying in a smith thread." deadwoodgregg
Ordained Minister of Perpetual Consumption and all around righteous dude.
My home gym pictures: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=175136471&p=1632857623&viewfull=1#post1632857623
My workout journal: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=120169181
-
04-15-2024, 07:15 AM #5200
-
-
04-15-2024, 08:45 AM #5201
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 58
- Posts: 1,929
- Rep Power: 25726
"It is my own fault for replying in a smith thread." deadwoodgregg
Ordained Minister of Perpetual Consumption and all around righteous dude.
My home gym pictures: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=175136471&p=1632857623&viewfull=1#post1632857623
My workout journal: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=120169181
-
04-22-2024, 10:50 AM #5202
[QUOTE=thedickus;1699959693]This is the IronMaster Belt Squat Attachment. I've had this for a couple of weeks now and have been using it on every leg day. I've never even used a belt squat before so I have nothing to compare it to. I figured for the $150 introductory price I could at least try it. I bought the IronMaster belt also for $50, if I ever decide to get a dedicated belt squat I'll at least have a belt. I doubt I'd ever be able to sell it if I didn't like it, not much of an IronMaster 2000 used market around me. So far I have to say I really like it. The movement feels great, I feel it much higher up on my quads than I do normal barbell squats (I'm a high bar just above parallel squatter). I've been doing cable squats (Brignole) when I want to keep the load off my spine. I've enjoyed them but always felt like I'm sacrificing weight/load on the movement. I can go much heavier obviously on the belt squat without worrying about me trying to keep my balance.
The pivot point attaches to the back frame of the IM 2000 and connects with a pin to allow it to pivot. You start from the top position and just twist the barbell to engage/lock or disengage/unlock the safety pins/stops of the bar. The movement is very smooth, it does get a little harder to twist the barbell to lock/unlock under heavier load, so far I've only gotten up to 365lbs total. It's rated up to 600lbs. I doubt that will become an issue for me. For the small amount of space this takes up it's a winner for me. I love the movement and it's really not an ordeal at all to set up.
interesting- didnt know they made that.
-
04-22-2024, 10:53 AM #5203
-
04-22-2024, 11:04 AM #5204
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 58
- Posts: 1,929
- Rep Power: 25726
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to grumpytude again.
Damn that looks nice! If I don't end up getting another regular 3 tier shelf, I may have to sell my vertical and go for this type. I really like how you don't have to reach around the sides to grab the heavier dumbbells at the bottom. I have mine sitting next to my 3 tier horizontal rack but the amount of room I need to leave on the side to comfortable unrack and rerack the dumbbells I might as well just have another horizontal rack. This one would solve that problem."It is my own fault for replying in a smith thread." deadwoodgregg
Ordained Minister of Perpetual Consumption and all around righteous dude.
My home gym pictures: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=175136471&p=1632857623&viewfull=1#post1632857623
My workout journal: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=120169181
-
-
04-22-2024, 11:44 AM #5205
I did see other racks I really liked but they all seem built for Hex dumbbells. Yes the front access was very important to me. This way I can get another piece of equipment next to the rack, thinking of getting a preacher bench. Not sure if I want a standing or seated version.
Ironically I was worried about the heavier dumbbells hitting each other- but the 5lb set does touch the 10lb set a little bit. But I think its more to do with REPS design of that particular dumbbell. Of course my ideal rack is a horizontal with rubber cradles for each dumbbell, but no way I have the room. I still have the Ironmasters with 120lb kit so I should be all set. At least now I do some drop sets and quicker sets on some stuff. Overall I'm happy with it.
-
04-22-2024, 12:11 PM #5206
-
04-23-2024, 08:55 AM #5207
- Join Date: Feb 2017
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Age: 48
- Posts: 377
- Rep Power: 3189
Got some Average Joe stainless handles for my U-90 Powerblocks. Great grip. Too much for me actually. At light weights it's fine but at heavier weights it really digs in. He separates them out between light, medium, and aggressive and I got medium. I went from the contoured rubber grips that were hard to get a good grip on to the opposite extreme. I may exchange them for light a lighter knurl.
Went with the 35mm which is perfect for my big hands.
Similar Threads
-
*** Consider this an invitation....to the Gangsta Nation: Deux****
By KingOfChaos in forum Misc.Replies: 9092Last Post: 10-04-2009, 02:50 PM
Bookmarks