Lol @ Gulf state arabs thinking they can make some place superior to Western societies, funded by oil etc.
And in stark contrast is their strict cultural customs, Muslim-majority etc. Life isn't what it's cracked up to be there. It's very superficial.
I've been to ***** once.
|
-
06-19-2016, 10:47 AM #91Positive Crew
Dentist Crew
Seen the Eiffel Tower but haven't been to France Crew
"Your thoughts become your beliefs. Your beliefs become your words. Your words become your actions. Your actions become your habits. Your habits become your values. Your values become your destiny."
-
06-19-2016, 10:50 AM #92
-
-
06-19-2016, 12:15 PM #93
i read when the oil runs out they'll be back to riding camels and having to sell the lambos.
Subjecting yourself to self imposed discipline is the surest way to increase the quality of your existence
Never accept defeat
Cobra Kai Crew
The opposite of courage, in our society, is not cowardice but conformity
-
06-19-2016, 12:22 PM #94
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Posts: 34,900
- Rep Power: 238366
Been to ***** many times and it os pretty soul less.
You can have fun and party but you have to do it at hotels. no clubs or random bars.
Plus 99.9% of the people you deal with will probably be from india or the phillipines so you never really come in contact with the residents unless its walking past them. You wont find much spontaneous fun unless you happen into a bar where there are a bunch of people already partying."To be a warrior is not a simple matter of wishing to be one. It is rather an endless struggle that will go on to the very last moment of our lives. Nobody is born a warrior, in exactly the same way that nobody is born an average man. We make ourselves into one or the other."-- Carlos Castaneda
-
06-19-2016, 12:23 PM #95
-
06-19-2016, 12:24 PM #96
-
-
06-19-2016, 12:27 PM #97
The US was built on the back of slaves. ***** actually pays them.
So what do you guys suggest? You know the country with the most slaves in the world is India right? And second place (China) isn't even close. All these Indian "slaves" come in, but you would suggest sending them back to India where they probably would be slaves that didn't even have the hope of getting paid? Not to mention India has widespread poverty already. All these Indians in ***** are from the poorest class of India. They are mostly male. So if ***** sends them back they will go back to a country that is already overpopulated, India will have to deal with a large amount of poor people, and those people are mostly men (keep in mind India already has a terrible sex ratio). Crime will increase, poverty will increase, and general welfare of India will decrease.
So I ask all the hypocritical bastards here, what is your solution?
-
06-19-2016, 12:30 PM #98
-
06-19-2016, 12:33 PM #99
The issue of slavery in the United States was ultimately decided by the Civil War (1861-1865). It was a showdown between the free North and the slave South, amongst other things. It was also one of the first “total wars” seen by the West in a very long time.
As Warfare in the Western World: Military Operations from 1600 to 1871, describes it:
“The final year of the Civil War witnessed the full bloom of total war. No western state in centuries had waged a military contest more comprehensively than did the Union and Confederacy. Determined national efforts the world had seen: during the Napoleonic Wars the Spanish and Russian people had fought relentlessly against the French invaders; and in 1813 the Russians had pursued the retreating French for nearly a thousand miles. Yet neither the Spanish nor the Russians had mobilized their populations and economies as systematically as did the North and South.”
If we are to judge who or what “built” America, we must honestly look at the legacy and the strength of each. The reality is that the slave-holding South lost the Civil War. Why? Why, if slavery built America, was it not able to provide the strength needed to the South to be able to crush the North? And what did the North have that made it so great without the aid of slavery?
For that, history indicates rather obviously that the South was an agrarian economy while the North was an industrial economy. From America: A Narrative History by George Tindall and David Shi we learn,
“By 1840 many thoughtful southerners reasoned that by staking everything on agriculture the region had wasted chances in manufacturing and trade. After the War of 1812, as cotton growing swept everything before it, the South became increasingly dependent on northern manufacturing and trade. Cotton and tobacco were exported mainly in northern vessels. Southerners also relied on connections in the North for imported goods. The South became, economically if not formally, a kind of colonial dependency of the North.”
That isn’t the description of strength that one would think would come from a region employing the “peculiar institution” that America supposedly was built upon. Instead, it would appear that a region dependent upon enslaving others ended up enslaving itself to a free North.
Turning back to Warfare in the Western World, we find statistics that show just how dramatic the differences in populations and economic power were between the free North and the slave South.
“But in a longer struggle the North’s advantages were substantial. With a population of 20 million, the Northern states obviously possessed a much larger military manpower base, but their industrial capacity was far greater as well. In 1860 the North had over 110,000 manufacturing establishments, the South just 18,000. The North produced 94 percent of the country’s iron, 97 percent of is coal and – not incidentally – 97 percent of its firearms. It contained 22,000 miles of railroad to the South’s 8,500. The North outperformed the South agriculturally as well. Northerners held 75 percent of the country’s farm acreage, produced 60 percent of its livestock, 67 percent of its corn, and 81 percent of its wheat. All in all, they held 75 percent of the nation’s total wealth.”
That final statistic combined with the North’s victory in the Civil War should be sufficient to dispel the idea that America was built on slavery. Keep in mind, too, that not all of the wealth in the South was generated by slaves. Free men in the South also worked their own fields and industries.
The truth is, America was primarily built on the industry of free people. Slavery was a terrible thing that went against the founding ideals of the country. Nonetheless, we do not need to create false narratives to know it was wrong and to have sympathy for both those who lived through it and for those who carried the scars forward.
Indeed, it does damage to one’s cause to push a false narrative that cannot stand up under scrutiny and calls in to question any other statements one makes as well as the agenda for making them.
Cliffs:No, it wasn't.No Glow, No Go Crew
*Cries about negs* Crew
-
06-19-2016, 12:37 PM #100
-
-
06-19-2016, 12:40 PM #101
Nice copy from some random blog *******, by some guy named Devin Foley. The South wasn't the only side with slaves, the North had slaves too. George Washington, Jefferson, etc they all had slaves, they weren't Southerners. The South provided a lot of wealth for the North, that's why the North didn't want them to leave, ever hear of king cotton? Cotton exports alone accounted for about 50% of the nations total exports. Obviously slavery was valuable to the US, you think they just did it for ****s and giggles? It was all about money.
-
06-19-2016, 12:43 PM #102
-
06-19-2016, 12:44 PM #103
-
06-19-2016, 12:45 PM #104
It's a shell, it's artificial, it's like a North Korean hotel; it exists but no-one is home. If it wasn't for natural resources they'd be fuked, everything constructed is overkill and show-ponying.
EoR is powered by unique Nanomolecular Hyperdispersion Technology. Giving him high bioavailability and myocellular saturation.
-
-
06-19-2016, 12:55 PM #105
Of course not OP, ***** wasn't build on intelligence and cooperation like civilizations of northern races (europe, china, japan, etc). The average IQ over there is still mid 80's. The country is build on oil, like a bodybuilder that takes steroids but doesn't even know how to train. Just a bunch of apes that fell on a treasure and are now rejoicing in Western inventions, architecture, cars, SCIENCE, innovation. Every modern material thing in that city is because of whites & orientals.
And this is what is missing, when you walk in London, you see the progress of civilization, you see the hard work, and that what is charming. In Italy you can see the connection & progress from nothing, from nature, to Ferrari; in ***** you just see Ferrari. And indeed, a rural town somewhere in Afghanistan where they make carpets is 10x more charming than *****.
Melts my heart, no matter how much oil ***** is able to sell, they will never top this.Last edited by RaceRealist; 06-19-2016 at 01:10 PM.
-
06-19-2016, 01:03 PM #106
-
06-19-2016, 01:12 PM #107
-
06-19-2016, 02:29 PM #108
The Burmese built an entire capital city that nobody lives in
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2...-highways-wifi
-
-
06-19-2016, 02:32 PM #109
-
06-19-2016, 04:36 PM #110
-
06-19-2016, 04:42 PM #111
Been to Dubi many times for work.
Can confirm, most of the new city is souless as fk.
The only thing that makes it remotely enjoyable is that all the westerners who work their are balls deep in cash, so there are some good western only nightlife spots.
apart from that if you want to see the real UAE, take a cultural exchange to the tribal areas, some of the oasis/water spots are really nice.
But mostly its sand, heat and more sand.
-
06-19-2016, 04:44 PM #112
-
-
06-19-2016, 04:45 PM #113
-
06-19-2016, 04:56 PM #114
-
06-19-2016, 05:02 PM #115
-
06-19-2016, 07:57 PM #116
can you rephrase that?
No one will ever top this. Remain our culture, our race, the others couldn't do it on their own, so what are they going to contribute? Moving from Africa to the West doesn't change your genes. People makes cultures, a dumb gene pool creates a dumb culture, a smart genepool creates a smart culture. You can't have a first world country with third world people, EXCEPT when they find trillions and trillions dollars worth of oil, but than you get something as ARTIFICIAL as *****.Last edited by RaceRealist; 06-19-2016 at 08:11 PM.
-
-
06-19-2016, 07:59 PM #117
-
06-20-2016, 04:19 AM #118
-
06-20-2016, 04:24 AM #119
-
06-20-2016, 04:25 AM #120
Bookmarks