Alan Aragon & Brad Schoenfeld (and others) just ran a study in well trained individuals. One group was not allowed to eat 2 hours before their workout and had a protein supplement after. The other group had a protein supplement before their workout and was not allowed to eat 2 hours after. There were no significant differences between groups.
So it's another study showing that you don't need to slam a protein shake after your workout, especially if you have consumed protein before.
This was mentioned in this podcast, they did not mention much more about this study http://sigmanutrition.com/episode104/
|
-
01-21-2016, 11:56 PM #1
New study finds no difference between consuming a protein shake pre or post workout
Last edited by Mrpb; 01-22-2016 at 06:01 AM.
Recommended science based fitness & nutrition information:
Alan Aragon https://alanaragon.com/
Brad Schoenfeld http://www.lookgreatnaked.com/
James Krieger https://weightology.net/
Jorn Trommelen http://www.nutritiontactics.com/
Eric Helms & Team3DMJ https://3dmusclejourney.com/
-
01-22-2016, 12:02 AM #2
-
01-22-2016, 12:11 AM #3
-
01-22-2016, 02:39 AM #4
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 16,991
- Rep Power: 91765
This was pretty much well understood for awhile now (that if pre and optionally intra workout nutrition was properly in place then the post workout meal does not have as much importance).
The trend in recent years however has been that "training fasted is great and doesn't matter! Just get your daily food in whenever!" Which is just not a good idea unless your only concern is to lose fat and you don't care about your LBM.Completed Logs & Reviews:
Clear Muscle Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161906833&p=1244983053#post1244983053
"Now that you've got a basic degree of strength you can now proceed with success onto a bodybuilding type program - which I am not experienced in providing. You've exceeded what I focus on, and that is beginner strength gains." - Mark Rippetoe
-
-
01-22-2016, 03:02 AM #5
Semi-related;
This reminds me of Kevin Tipton studies on pre and post workout nutrition.
In 2001, he did a study using EAAs which seems to indicate pre-workout protein was more beneficial (http://ajpendo.physiology.org/content/281/2/E197). Then in 2007, he repeated the study with whey protein and there was no difference between the pre and post workout groups. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16896166).You can't get much done in life if you only work on the days when you feel good.
� Jerry West �
How to Upgrade Your Life: A Primer On Diet And Fitness
https://guavarilla.wordpress.com/fitness-guide/
-
01-22-2016, 03:05 AM #6
-
01-22-2016, 03:13 AM #7
This is the first ever study to investigate this in well trained individuals.
So this was not already known.Recommended science based fitness & nutrition information:
Alan Aragon https://alanaragon.com/
Brad Schoenfeld http://www.lookgreatnaked.com/
James Krieger https://weightology.net/
Jorn Trommelen http://www.nutritiontactics.com/
Eric Helms & Team3DMJ https://3dmusclejourney.com/
-
01-22-2016, 04:02 AM #8
-
-
01-22-2016, 04:22 AM #9
-
01-22-2016, 04:44 AM #10
-
01-22-2016, 05:15 AM #11
The leangains guy was doing this 5-10 years ago. He had people who trained fasted in the morning only ingesting 3*10g of BCAA (10g pre, and 20g post) while eating nothing until 1 pm (about 5 hours after actual training). He said there was no difference between this protocol and eating straight after workout.
He also said (if I remember correctly) that 20g post was only because he wanted to err on the safe side, not because he actually thought it made a lot of difference.Last edited by Rushie; 01-22-2016 at 05:29 AM.
-
01-22-2016, 05:41 AM #12
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Location: Arizona, United States
- Posts: 22,186
- Rep Power: 661583
Pretty much the same for me. I prefer to also take in my carbs intra and post (in a shake) because #1 Time (don't have it in the morning) and #2 I won't get the chance to eat a meal for 1-2 hours after oh and #3 I like having my shake so 0 fuks about it.
I must be one of the lucky ones since I can still grow without having a pre meal.Lead Forum Representative
www.bluestarnutraceuticals.com
Stay Connected with Exclusive Content & Special Offers:
********: bluestarnutraceuticals
Instagram: @bluestarnutraceuticals / @dazedncnfz
YouTube: bluestarnutraceuticals
Disclaimer: The above post is my personal opinion and does not represent the official position of any company or entity.
-
-
01-22-2016, 05:59 AM #13
-
01-22-2016, 06:07 AM #14
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 16,991
- Rep Power: 91765
This was already known with many if not most bodybuilders. Did a study really need to be done to realize this? We have had earlier studies showing the benefits of pre/intra workout nutrition and we also have the post workout nutrition study from last year. It's not that difficult to extrapolate the key points by looking through the earlier data.
The post workout nutrition study from last year was particularly interesting since it looked at net protein balance rather than what the acute markers indicated.
I'm not implying that this new study is worthless, it's more or less validation for what many already realized or could be extrapolated from existing data. Mind you, the post workout nutrition data from last year also used well trained individuals.Completed Logs & Reviews:
Clear Muscle Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161906833&p=1244983053#post1244983053
"Now that you've got a basic degree of strength you can now proceed with success onto a bodybuilding type program - which I am not experienced in providing. You've exceeded what I focus on, and that is beginner strength gains." - Mark Rippetoe
-
01-22-2016, 06:14 AM #15
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 51
- Posts: 22,582
- Rep Power: 91685
Am I in bizzaro world? Taking a look at most posts in this forum has many people recommending a post-workout shake. Even many of the guys that say in one breath that they are aware that the most important factor is total protein, in the next breath say that they personally have a shake afterwards, and/or tout BCAAs for between meals.
-
01-22-2016, 06:23 AM #16
-
-
01-22-2016, 06:24 AM #17
-
01-22-2016, 06:26 AM #18
-
01-22-2016, 06:34 AM #19
-
01-22-2016, 06:36 AM #20
I split the difference and do half before and half after. I never expected it to matter all that much though, it was more of a "just in case it actually matters I am covered either way".
Eat in a deficit to lose weight.
Hit your protein and fat minimums to stay healthy and keep your gainz.
Lift heavy and do HIIT to look and feel awesome.
Use the internet to learn why you should do these things and how to do these things.
-
-
01-22-2016, 06:43 AM #21
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 32,237
- Rep Power: 302249
-
01-22-2016, 06:45 AM #22
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 16,991
- Rep Power: 91765
Do you guys not venture OUTSIDE of bb.com boards? Perhaps look at the plethora of content on T-Nation? Stuff Meadows write? EliteFTS?
I'm not saying that Schoenfeld and Aragon are not smart guys, but this data you speak of is really just validating what was suspected by many for a good long while already. Which is valuable in it's own right but it's not a Earth shattering discovery.
Also, notice how I did point out that most BODYBUILDERS not NOOBS or RECREATIONAL LIFTERS more or less already understood the importance of periworkout nutrition (which means pre + intra and then post workout becomes less important or the reverse).Completed Logs & Reviews:
Clear Muscle Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=161906833&p=1244983053#post1244983053
"Now that you've got a basic degree of strength you can now proceed with success onto a bodybuilding type program - which I am not experienced in providing. You've exceeded what I focus on, and that is beginner strength gains." - Mark Rippetoe
-
01-22-2016, 06:46 AM #23
-
01-22-2016, 06:47 AM #24
-
-
01-22-2016, 07:07 AM #25
I don't read those websites or authors, I read the literature.
Here's a 2015 review by Stuart Phillips, considered by many to be one of the leading protein researchers in the world.
Timing of Protein Ingestion
We have known for some time that RE alone results in a long-lasting elevation in MPS for at least 48 h and MPB for 24 h (Phillips et al., 1997); thus, even in the basal fasted state there is a subsequent increase in the turnover of muscle proteins. RE alone elevating basal MPS will “prime” the muscle to be responsive, in terms of an increased sensitivity of MPS, to aminoacidemia. The duration of this sensitivity is at least 24 h (Burd et al., 2011) and, based on the similar protein dose thresholds (Moore et al., 2009; Witard et al., 2014a), we predict no difference in sensitivity between untrained and trained individuals. Given the sensitizing effect of RE, we conclude it is most advantageous to ingest protein and generate hyeraminoacidemia in the post-RE period.
Some have postulated that pre-exercise protein ingestion may also “prime” the system and offer some advantage over a post-exercise supplementation strategy. However, ingesting 20 g of whey protein either before or 1 h after 10 sets of leg extension resulted in similar rates of AA uptake (Tipton et al., 2007). In other studies there was no benefit shown with pre-exercise AA feeding (Fujita et al., 2009; Burke et al., 2012a). Considering the synergistic response of aminoacidemia following RE (Biolo et al., 1997; Burd et al., 2011), we see it as being optimal to ingest protein immediately following RE. Moreover, we speculate pre-exercise aminoacidemia may blunt the subsequent post-RE MPS response to AAs due to an overlap in the aminoacidemic responses and a muscle full effect (Atherton et al., 2010)...
A recent meta-analysis examining protein timing and hypertrophy concluded that the ingestion of a post-exercise supplement in closer temporal proximity to RE positively influenced hypertrophy (Schoenfeld et al., 2013); however, after adjustment for all covariates, the authors concluded that total protein intake was the strongest predictor of muscular hypertrophy and that protein timing did not influence hypertrophy. Nonetheless, practical advice would dictate that the post-exercise period is a time when rehydration, refueling (carbohydrate), and repair (3R) of damaged tissues should occur.
Anyone can say "the outcome was not surprising" or "I already suspected this" and that makes sense. I did too.
However, saying "this was already known" isn't accurate.
Agreed. And now we have more certainty.Recommended science based fitness & nutrition information:
Alan Aragon https://alanaragon.com/
Brad Schoenfeld http://www.lookgreatnaked.com/
James Krieger https://weightology.net/
Jorn Trommelen http://www.nutritiontactics.com/
Eric Helms & Team3DMJ https://3dmusclejourney.com/
-
01-22-2016, 07:14 AM #26
-
01-22-2016, 07:17 AM #27
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 32,237
- Rep Power: 302249
-
01-22-2016, 07:21 AM #28
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Posts: 42,765
- Rep Power: 828020
-
-
01-22-2016, 07:23 AM #29
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 32,237
- Rep Power: 302249
-
01-22-2016, 07:28 AM #30
Bookmarks