Question for Non-9/11 Truthers: Did You Know Jet Fuel is Just Kerosene?

[metco]

The answers to your questions can be found on my posts on the very first page of this thread.

Again, here's a decent starter: https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911NutPhysics.HTM

Use the sitemap to navigate to other arguments.

From your link:

One thing radically different about 9-11 is that controlled demolitions always set off charges low in the structure and let the weight of the building do the rest. Nobody ever set off charges high in a building to pancake the stories beneath. So why resort to a radical and unproven method if you want to bring down the World Trade Center?

This is not true. There are two kinds of demolitions: top-down and bottom up. Buildings that are tall and narrow are not cut from the bottom up because of the danger of the building tipping over. Therefore they are cut from the middle/ top down, like the demolition in the video below. Note the streamers of debris arcing out from the building in the familiar pattern we saw on 9/11.




WTC7 on the other hand (not hit by a plane) was a classic bottom-up implosion. Anyone who believes this was anything but a demolition is in serious denial, or a shill.




Add in hundreds of facts like WTC owner Larry Silverstein, his son, and his daughter all missing work that day, the molten steel, the impossible flying jobs, Dick Cheney literally allowing Flight 77 to continue into DC airspace, and there is no possible way you can believe the official story unless you are a total sheep.

Dick Cheney: http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/alibis/cheney.html

Silverstein and children miss work, what luck: http://www.historycommons.org/contex...ersteindoctors

How they did it is fairly simple. Cutter charges like below but much bigger wired up and down the buildings (using wifi not actual wires.) It's called cutter and kicker charge: first charge cuts the vertical support beam, second one "kicks" the cut section out, exactly as we see in the slow-mo video below. The nano-thermite weakened the strongpoints like the mechanical floors, which is why we saw molten steel dripping from those floors.





Cutter and kicker charge action:



Slow-mo:



read: How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition

[ManxCat]

From your link:



This is not true. There are two kinds of demolitions: top-down and bottom up. Buildings that are tall and narrow are not cut from the bottom up because of the danger of the building tipping over. Therefore they are cut from the middle/ top down, like the demolition in the video below. Note the streamers of debris arcing out from the building in the familiar pattern we saw on 9/11.




WTC7 on the other hand (not hit by a plane) was a classic bottom-up implosion. Anyone who believes this was anything but a demolition is in serious denial, or a shill.




Add in hundreds of facts like WTC owner Larry Silverstein, his son, and his daughter all missing work that day, the molten steel, the impossible flying jobs, Dick Cheney literally allowing Flight 77 to continue into DC airspace, and there is no possible way you can believe the official story unless you are a total sheep.

Dick Cheney: http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/alibis/cheney.html

Silverstein and children miss work, what luck: http://www.historycommons.org/contex...ersteindoctors

How they did it is fairly simple. Cutter charges like below but much bigger wired up and down the buildings (using wifi not actual wires.) It's called cutter and kicker charge: first charge cuts the vertical support beam, second one "kicks" the cut section out, exactly as we see in the slow-mo video below. The nano-thermite weakened the strongpoints like the mechanical floors, which is why we saw molten steel dripping from those floors.





Cutter and kicker charge action:



Slow-mo:



read: How it Was Done: 9/11 and the Science of Building Demolition

If you still think it was thermite, then I'd like to know how thermite can turn a 700 foot tall structural steel beam to dust where it stands?

I think its 100% undebunkable to be honest, for both thermite truthers and non truthers alike.

[Bushmaster]

If you still think it was thermite, then I'd like to know how thermite can turn a 700 foot tall structural steel beam to dust where it stands?

I think its 100% undebunkable to be honest, for both thermite truthers and non truthers alike.

TRUTHER FIGHT!!!

But anyway..

I wasn't talking about you two specifically. I was talking about all you truth fruits lol.. I've heard it all bro.

-Steel beams cut
-Steel beams melted
-Steel beams vaporized with death beams
-Buildings pulverized
-Building debris blown miles in all directions
-Buildings collapsed into their own footprints
-Video trickery
-No planes
-Yes planes
-Cruise missiles

Etc.

Another one even tried convincing us that nobody actually died at all on 9/11 once lol.

Can you explain the discrepancies?

[Ausaric]

You don't need to heat steel up to its melting point in order for its structural integrity to be weakened to the point where it can bend. Once steel reaches certain temperatures which are easily achievable with building fires that aren't aided by accelerants, the steel can be bent rather easily by humans hands, let alone the massive stresses exerted upon them by skyscrapers.

[ManxCat]

TRUTHER FIGHT!!!

But anyway..

Its probably the most controversial event in world history, so obviously its gonna attract masses of different people with massively different opinions, its no mystery.

[Bushmaster]

Its probably the most controversial event in world history, so obviously its gonna attract masses of different people with massively different opinions, its no mystery.

You can argue whether or not it was terrorists, or if the gumint was responsible all day long, but you fruits can't even get your stories straight on how the fuking buildings fell lol.

[metco]

If you still think it was thermite, then I'd like to know how thermite can turn a 700 foot tall structural steel beam to dust where it stands?

I think its 100% undebunkable to be honest, for both thermite truthers and non truthers alike.

I think you are talking about the spire, the lol proof that it wasn't a gravity collapse. What's left of the core structure is still wobbling, after all that blast the beams stood in place, then finally failed in pieces, straight down. You see where they fell here:



the spire


core


Core illustration


All the steel didn't "turn to dust." You can see it all over the friggin place out to Liberty Street.

[ManxCat]

I think you are talking about the spire, the lol proof that it wasn't a gravity collapse. What's left of the core structure is still wobbling, after all that blast the beams stood in place, then finally failed in pieces, straight down. You see where they fell here:



the spire


core


Core illustration


All the steel didn't "turn to dust." You can see it all over the friggin place out to Liberty Street.

If you think it failed into pieces and went straight down then you have something wrong with your eyes, it clearly disintegrates into dust, and the "mist" thats left behind couldn't be just dust coming off a solid object because dust takes much longer to settle, the dust literally is the object.

The size of the building alone should make it obvious that it would have just been impractical to bring them doen with thermite, it would have taken months if not fricken years to get enough of it in place. This should be obvious.

[ManxCat]

If the buildings slammed to the ground there would have been a seismic signal to support this, but it just didn't happen:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAMnpYxJtVQ

[ManxCat]

Dr. Judy Wood - "The Spire"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyM9y2xo4RQ

[Orlando1234977]

Dr. Judy Wood - "The Spire"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyM9y2xo4RQ

hm PHD in Materials Science Engineering, research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science, authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers and journal publications in her areas of expertise & even she thinks the official story is whack.

[ManxCat]

& even she thinks the official story is whack.

I think thats something we can all agree on at least.

[ManxCat]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_9gVvA_CVU

Dr. Judy Wood - Lack of Debris