|
Thread: What is Islamophobia?
-
02-09-2015, 12:29 PM #31
-
02-09-2015, 12:31 PM #32
It is a term used to silence criticism of Jihadist ideology, a tool of modern political correctness.
Are there some people who are genuinely irrationally afraid of Muslims? Yes, and for them the term is fine.
But it is often used to target anyone critical of groups like Hamas, the MB, etc.When all that says 'it is good' has been debunked, what says 'I want' remains.
- CS Lewis
-
-
02-09-2015, 12:31 PM #33
-
02-09-2015, 12:36 PM #34
-
02-09-2015, 12:39 PM #35
-
02-09-2015, 12:39 PM #36
-
-
02-09-2015, 12:56 PM #37
Agreed.
Islamaphobia is a slanderous defence designed to instantly shutdown any scrutiny of Muslim actions or beliefs.
Homophobia at least makes sense in as much as gay people aren't killing or threatening anyone with violence. Muslims on the other hand are responsible for more terrorist attacks per year than the entire rest of the world combined.
Islam isn't a race it's a set of archaic ideas that haven't changed or been updated in over a thousand years. Obviously these outdated concepts lead to violence when they come in contact with the 21st century. So they need to be criticised and not blindly defended.
-
02-09-2015, 01:13 PM #38
The police force is huge but it took them 10+ minutes to get to an active crime scene.
Something doesn't add up, brah.
I understand if this was in the sticks, like out in the country/farmlands where the nearest police precinct is 10+ miles away.. but normally in the cities.. each individual city is broken up into districts or regions for lack of a better term. Each one of these regions has a precinct. Of course this is all based on how heavily dense the population is of said city.
Anyways I don't care if police watches a group closely if that group is actively committing crimes. That's justifiable. But if a group is being watched without any real evidence or a history of committing any sort of crime.. lol well then it's obvious there's a set discriminatory policy.أشهد أن لا إله إلاَّ الله و أشهد أن محمد رسول الله
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🚷 Anti-Degeneracy League 🚷
https://www.twitter.com/eyeonpalestine
Mossad acronym: ISIS AKA Israeli Secret Intelligence Service
-
02-09-2015, 01:16 PM #39
-
02-09-2015, 01:56 PM #40
In response to Islamaphobia upholder Glenn Greenwald claiming Islam is no worse than any other religion in suppressing human rights. Sam Harris proposed a “dueling cartoon” contest:
Sam proposed he would post cartoons making fun of any faith other than Islam, and in return Greenwald would post anti-Islamic cartoons. A very clever proposal, and one with a predictable outcome.
Greenwald didn’t respond and this was months before Charlie Hebdo, which hammered the point home even harder. Checkmate Sam Harris.
-
-
02-09-2015, 02:10 PM #41
The treatment is after you die. It happens on the judgment, and you'll go to paradise or hell based on your beliefs and actions. However, as an apostate you don't believe in any of these. No judgment day, no hell, and no fire. So, to you, this so-called treatment isn't even real. It doesn't exist.
Well, its true that our beliefs do end up informing our actions.
Well thank you for the advice. I don't think, unless I am posting a humorous post, I ever argue based on name-calling, lies or a disinformation campaign.
1. I still haven't concluded if your prophet was an atheist or not. I opened that thread up for discussion that will help me conclude one way or another. If he was, then he was a liar pretending to be a prophet for whatever reason. I am not typing ANY OF THIS to offend ANYONE!
If I was arguing against you in the court of law, I'd use the same language. I happen to respect you more than I respect your prophet. I won't be saying anything for the express purpose of offending you in the court. It's just a conclusion I am drawing.
2. If calling your prophet a liar AFTER I can be reasonably sure that he was a liar is so much offensive that you feel like you have to say that I have nothing "Intellectual" to say, imagine being me, an ex-muslim and a non-believer. I have to live with knowing that people worships an entity that threatens me with eternal hellfire!
Me calling Muhammad anything doesn't affect him. But you do believe that your God can and will affect the destiny of us disbelievers, don't you? Why not be outraged by that instead of this?
It stands to reason that like every other human mother, Mary had sex with some other human to give birth to Jesus. But I will not shy away from pointing that out. Not because I want to offend you, I don't get anything good out of that. I just want the voice of reason to be heard. Someone has to stand up and call it.
If so, would you not consider this bigotry against Christians? (And I wonder if the Christians who cheer you on now, would cheer you on then as well.)
You can conclude Muhammed was a liar, that is your intellectual right. But to use that conclusion to now harass Muslims is bigotry towards Muslims.
In the world of academia discussions against various ideologies are prevalent, but you rarely see people accuse one another of bigotry. Why? because their discussions don't succumb to condescending remarks.
Lastly, no I'm not outraged my the works of my deity. I have understood my place and His place in the bigger picture and have come to submit to His laws and words.And David said, "The Lord who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the paw of the bear, He will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine." And Saul said to David, "Go, and may the Lord be with you." (1 Samuel 17:37)
Thus David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and he struck the Philistine and killed him; but there was no sword in David’s hand. (1 Samuel 17:50)
-
02-09-2015, 02:35 PM #42
-
02-09-2015, 02:46 PM #43a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.
^ Oh nose look at the scary Muslims I am way scaredier of thems than that couple of Patriots that murdered cops for eating pizza and statistically speaking are way more dangerous to my personal safety
-
02-09-2015, 02:54 PM #44
-
-
02-09-2015, 02:58 PM #45
-
02-09-2015, 02:58 PM #46
Over a greater course of time... the 'victim tactic' is greater than damn near anything relating to traditional warfare. However, unlike any other that may use this tactic, the Muslim community has already forfeited that option. Sorry sick domineering-islamists, a certain level of brudish, animalistic action will forever destroy your credibility. Since you masqueraded as islam (more correctly, were a bunch of vengeful sickfcks that thought islam meant the nature of humanity was intended to be vicious, coniving, and murderous), you must be culled. More than anything, this is an indication of the necessity of formal education EVERYWHERE. Basic, organized logic of the mind.. of the 'self', in its respected society prevents most of these sick rationalizations that terrorists concoct.
We need systems approach to government, no longer partisan patchwork
adios guys, ill lurk 2/15
-
02-09-2015, 03:04 PM #47
-
02-09-2015, 03:25 PM #48
Islamiphobia is when Islamics don't like having a mirror held up to their backwards religion so they try to intimidate everyone into keeping quiet about their violent beliefs by claiming any complaints about their religion is not because of the statistical, documented violence..but because of fear or bigotry.
-
-
02-09-2015, 04:07 PM #49
-
02-09-2015, 04:09 PM #50
-
02-09-2015, 04:18 PM #51
-
02-09-2015, 05:18 PM #52
Examples:
A) I do not think Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, because that seems to physically impossible. (legitimate opinion and belief)
B) I think Mary was a lying adulteress, and all Christians are stupid for believing the virgin birth story. (Bigotry)And David said, "The Lord who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the paw of the bear, He will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine." And Saul said to David, "Go, and may the Lord be with you." (1 Samuel 17:37)
Thus David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and he struck the Philistine and killed him; but there was no sword in David’s hand. (1 Samuel 17:50)
-
-
02-09-2015, 05:23 PM #53
-
02-09-2015, 05:40 PM #54
-
02-09-2015, 05:46 PM #55
-
02-09-2015, 06:18 PM #56
Thinking Christians are stupid for holding that particular belief isn't bigotry. It's a natural consequence of understanding that it's always more likely that lying/sex out of wedlock/etc/etc...even raped by aliens, is more likely than 'virgin birth' given our understanding of how babies happen on this planet.
Now 'stupid' is arguably mean spirited, impolite and unwarranted. You could go with 'cute or special'. But there's no cause to esteem their decision to hold this belief without better work on their side.
Bigotry is better reserved for having that sort of disgust/disdain/automatic aversion for a particular belief when that particular belief is reasonably correct.EX IGNORANTIA AD SAPIENTIAM
EX LUCE AD TENERBRAS
-
-
02-09-2015, 06:29 PM #57
-
02-09-2015, 06:48 PM #58
It's funny how we had nothing to fear until we started secretly arming & training them, invading them, bombing & killing them, & propping up corrupt rulers who oppress them.
Hey, we need oil & geo-politics forces hard choices to be made at times, but LoL at anyone who gets brain washed by boogyman propaganda - that's how bad decisions are made (where is Sadam's WMDs?).
-
02-09-2015, 06:55 PM #59
-
02-09-2015, 07:05 PM #60
Bookmarks