|
Thread: 035 Misc Photography Crew
-
02-28-2015, 07:03 PM #361
-
03-04-2015, 07:36 AM #362
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 60
- Posts: 128
- Rep Power: 935
Just discovered this thread. Wow impressed with the pictures posted here! Not professional but like to dabble.
So how about some astrophotography? Just digital photography with very big lenses and long exposures.
These were taken with my modified Canon 60D. Modification is to remove the first filter to let more of the wavelengths around 656 nm in. This is attached to my telescope with 190 mm aperture and a focal length of 1000 mm which puts it at about f/5.3.
Last edited by the3dwizard; 03-04-2015 at 07:44 AM.
-
03-04-2015, 07:44 AM #363
-
03-04-2015, 09:20 AM #364
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 60
- Posts: 128
- Rep Power: 935
Thanks! That part is actually easy now. My mount, which holds the telescope, is computer controlled. I have software that I can use to look up the position of an object. The software can then tell the mount where to move to. Then the software can take a shore exposure (~15s) to capture the star field. Then it performs pattern matching to see how far off it is and then will move the telescope again if need until the object is centered. Then I acquire around 2 dozen exposures of around 5 ir 10 mins each and then stack and process them to get the final image.
Thought you might be interest in how the camera is attached. In the picture the red unit is the focuser that I can control from my laptop to focus the camera. The little silver and black assembly is another camera that focuses on one star to keep the telescope centered on the object during the long exposure by sending signals to the computer to tell the mount where to move for the corrections. These happen about every 1-2 secs. If tracking is not perfect then you get star trails which we don't want in these images. I created a custom cable to power the camera from a 12V battery and the image acquisition is controlled by the laptop through the USB cable.
-
-
03-04-2015, 10:17 AM #365
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 60
- Posts: 3,217
- Rep Power: 15671
Utterly fantastic work! Makes my star shots look like I used a potato camera
But that takes all the challenge out of using setting circles and star charts! LIke GPS vs a topo map.
It's amazing the quality one can get that way. Amateurs now have pictures better than the best observatories when I was a kid.
Impressive set-up. I has an envy!Last edited by DocHoss; 03-04-2015 at 10:04 PM. Reason: topo typo
Peace: Lift Long and Prosper!
Alamagan Dågan - and proud of it!
Lean, mean, geek machine
-
03-04-2015, 10:22 AM #366
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 60
- Posts: 3,217
- Rep Power: 15671
Here's my astro-potato-photography Just a camera on a tripod, no clock drive or filters. But a nice dark sky!
Glories of the Southern Skies:
Milky Way with our satellite galaxies the Magellanic Clouds, Southern Cross, and Alpha & Beta Centauri (the pointers).
Magellanic Clouds with the great globular cluster 47 Tucanae below the SMC.
Peace: Lift Long and Prosper!
Alamagan Dågan - and proud of it!
Lean, mean, geek machine
-
03-04-2015, 10:24 AM #367
Incredibly awesome. That is a huge telescope for personal use. I have an idea and challenge for you. Try to photograph our Sun. Might require some specialized filters, i don't know, but would be interesting to see from your setup versus Hubble.
***Dochoss, your shots are great, too. Fabulous, actually.Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
-
03-04-2015, 03:49 PM #368
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 60
- Posts: 3,217
- Rep Power: 15671
Thanks, Mark!
I forgot to say - I have aperture envy too. What size scope do you have?
Also Mark: there aren't too many filters for ground-based solar use - either plain light or hydrogen-alpha. There are some impressive extreme ultraviolet images from satellite observatories, such as SOHO, SDO, and Hinode. Hubble, though, will never look at or even close to the Sun because it would destroy the optics.Peace: Lift Long and Prosper!
Alamagan Dågan - and proud of it!
Lean, mean, geek machine
-
-
03-04-2015, 05:24 PM #369
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 60
- Posts: 128
- Rep Power: 935
Thanks but there is no way I would have been able to do this in the good ole days. Imagine setting by your scope with a film camera attached. You look through a smaller scope that is attached to your main scope for 30 plus mins slowly turning a knob to keep the star center in the cross-hairs while you expose your film. Then you have to wait until you can get it developed to see if you were even successful! Not thanks, I'll keep my digital stuff lol
So jealous you get to photograph the southern skies. Very cool stuff!
-
03-04-2015, 10:07 PM #370
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 60
- Posts: 3,217
- Rep Power: 15671
Some thing when I was doing my bird work - it would takes weeks to find out if the pictures were OK!
And your photography wasn't even possible back then - no way to stack dozens of slides.
This was just a 2-week vacation to South Africa. Back in light-polluted central California now.Peace: Lift Long and Prosper!
Alamagan Dågan - and proud of it!
Lean, mean, geek machine
-
03-05-2015, 01:30 PM #371
-
03-05-2015, 04:24 PM #372
-
-
03-06-2015, 09:28 AM #373
-
03-06-2015, 01:41 PM #374
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 16,398
- Rep Power: 150402
Excellent shots. There's a guy in the misc photocrew that does some crazy work like this. I'm considering getting a tracker for my 500mm lens.
These are great shots. You may just be at the end of your equipment. Also, to really make a lot of astro stuff pop, post process work really helps (though processing astro work is an art in and of itself.
What were the settings and what was the lens?
I've seen some amazing photos from amateurs of the sun. Usually it requires stacking up to hundreds and even thousands of frames. There isn't so much a lot of expense, but a lot involved.
Will have to try. I would only need a $30 filter and I could probably find a cheap or free focus stacking software.
This is a great shot. I have yet to get a good shot of the moon coming over the horizon. Well done.
-
03-06-2015, 08:30 PM #375
-
03-08-2015, 07:33 PM #376*Official Misc Photography Crew *
“Pain is temporary. If I quit, however, it lasts forever. So when I feel like quitting, I ask myself, which would I rather live with?”
― Lance Armstrong
Accumulating injuries are the price we pay for the thrill of not having sat around on our asses. - Mark Rippetoe
Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general. - Mark Rippetoe
-
-
03-09-2015, 10:53 AM #377
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Hawaii, United States
- Age: 68
- Posts: 2,744
- Rep Power: 7124
JM, Beautiful! How do you get that off-focus effect accept directly on the face?
I'm open to any suggestions and have a difficult time accepting limitations without an honest effort on my part, you can count on that!
"iCan, iWill, iHave"
There are always choices, no bad ones, no good ones, only "great" ones,
"Oh, great!" :)
-
03-09-2015, 05:36 PM #378*Official Misc Photography Crew *
“Pain is temporary. If I quit, however, it lasts forever. So when I feel like quitting, I ask myself, which would I rather live with?”
― Lance Armstrong
Accumulating injuries are the price we pay for the thrill of not having sat around on our asses. - Mark Rippetoe
Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general. - Mark Rippetoe
-
03-09-2015, 06:48 PM #379
-
03-12-2015, 12:32 PM #380
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 16,398
- Rep Power: 150402
Very large apertures give very slim depth of field, so only a sliver of the composition is in focus. When you see blur, the effect is called bokeh. An F2.8 is enough to really seperate the subject out. Most makers have a "nifty fifty" lens. Which is a 50mm 1.8 and fairly inexpensive.
Great composition, but a very wide dynamic range. This is one of those instances where post processing can make a real difference.
Some shots from Ohio
-
-
03-12-2015, 12:38 PM #381
-
03-12-2015, 11:02 PM #382
-
03-14-2015, 10:28 AM #383
Nice work, acc! I like how you've captured Ohio in a different light. Is that a silo?
I've been trying to post some pics of flowers I took (only on my phone) but, they turned out well. (getting an error message when trying to post them here, but I'll figure it out)
Not sure if I hit the right time of day or what, but really nice lighting. I went for a run the other day, and had my phone on me for music so i thought I'd take a few. Does anyone here use any programs to ''enhance'' their photos? For the iphone, ''snapseed'' is pretty fun.
-
03-14-2015, 03:36 PM #384
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 16,398
- Rep Power: 150402
It was actually 65 degrees when I went to Hocking Hill so there was a big melt for a few days. After that, it went to bone chilling cold. It wasn't nearly as warm as it looks.
I lucked out and was away from NH during the blizzards. We got hammered here.
Yup... did lots of Silos. There was a lot of decay in the area and it made for an interesting subject.
Phones are coming with great cameras now. Which Iphone do you have? Personally, I use lightroom for all my processing and don't really do much w a phone.
Few more shots.
Salt Fork
Cedar Falls
-
-
03-15-2015, 09:52 AM #385
I have an iphone 4, and really need to upgrade it to the 6. Actually, would rather get a Samsung Galaxy. I'll have to check out lightroom.
Here's an interesting link, for what it's worth relating to the 'best' phone cameras. They have come a very long way...probably comparable to one of my less expensive Canon point/shoot cameras I use. lol
http://thedigitalcamera.net/best-cam...l-comparative/
-
03-16-2015, 12:26 AM #386
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Hawaii, United States
- Age: 68
- Posts: 2,744
- Rep Power: 7124
Photos I took in my yard today.
A lizard- there are all these small lizards running around.
close up of a Jade plant and the new rose plant I picked up in FebruaryI'm open to any suggestions and have a difficult time accepting limitations without an honest effort on my part, you can count on that!
"iCan, iWill, iHave"
There are always choices, no bad ones, no good ones, only "great" ones,
"Oh, great!" :)
-
03-16-2015, 01:04 AM #387
-
03-16-2015, 09:45 AM #388
-
-
03-16-2015, 10:32 AM #389
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Hawaii, United States
- Age: 68
- Posts: 2,744
- Rep Power: 7124
These would be great for memes....lol
frog kidding me.jpgLast edited by Frnkd; 03-16-2015 at 10:48 AM.
I'm open to any suggestions and have a difficult time accepting limitations without an honest effort on my part, you can count on that!
"iCan, iWill, iHave"
There are always choices, no bad ones, no good ones, only "great" ones,
"Oh, great!" :)
-
03-16-2015, 12:01 PM #390
Similar Threads
-
So, how many here are just here for the lulz?
By dbx in forum Over 35 MiscReplies: 154Last Post: 08-16-2014, 05:56 PM -
Official Misc Photography Crew - part 2
By jmelanson in forum Misc.Replies: 8261Last Post: 03-04-2013, 11:39 AM
Bookmarks