|
Thread: 17th Amendment Bad
-
06-04-2014, 01:15 PM #1
-
06-04-2014, 01:27 PM #2
-
06-04-2014, 01:39 PM #3
-
06-04-2014, 02:43 PM #4
-
-
06-04-2014, 02:56 PM #5
-
06-04-2014, 03:02 PM #6
-
06-04-2014, 03:21 PM #7
-
06-04-2014, 03:22 PM #8
-
-
06-04-2014, 03:23 PM #9
-
06-04-2014, 04:29 PM #10
-
06-04-2014, 05:22 PM #11
LOL.. I submit that there are 'slaves' left in America.. But these slaves are not the type owned, like properties back in the day. These modern-day slaves are slaves in their own mind - the ones that refuse to think for themselves...the ones who refuse to remove the 'victim lens' and refuse to take personal responsibility.
This above all..
To thine ownself be true..
And it must follow, as the night the day..
Thou can'st not then be false to any man..
-----------------------------------------------
Bros, my Weightlifters and Powerlifters are my credentials.
-
06-04-2014, 05:36 PM #12
-
-
06-04-2014, 05:52 PM #13
BINGO!! The House is supposed to have more power than the Senate.. We all know that the three branches of government at the federal level are supposed to have balance of power.. The beauty of the Constitution, per the Founding Fathers' intent, is that not only should there be balance horizontally, there should also be balance vertically.. Kinda like our solar system.. Each planet revolving about its own orbit. And if they get too close, BAM!
The States and the Federal Government were supposed to be a representative form of government. At the local level, however, the early Americans were encouraged to exercise more of a participatory democracy. Kinda like town hall meetings, WHERE THE MAJORITY RULES. This is only ideal at the local level. At the state or national level, 'majority rules' will be disastrous. You have your own issues over there in New Hampshire. We have our own issues down here in PA.. And our Southern Brothers have their own issues in their towns in Texas, the Carolinas, etc.. So who would make the best decision at the local level? You know the answer to this. When you have an ultra-powerful centralized government mandating our Brothers in Alabama that they must have 45-degree pitched roof in case of a snow blizzard (I'm exaggerating to make a point), then you know the system is seriously broken.
And because the government has become this uncontrollable, too big to fail, beast, any laws they pass they are also exempt from..
I think the best way to take this country back is to start from grassroots.This above all..
To thine ownself be true..
And it must follow, as the night the day..
Thou can'st not then be false to any man..
-----------------------------------------------
Bros, my Weightlifters and Powerlifters are my credentials.
-
06-04-2014, 05:54 PM #14
-
06-04-2014, 06:26 PM #15
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Location: Hawaii, United States
- Age: 68
- Posts: 2,744
- Rep Power: 7124
What got me was the use the words "unconstitutional bills", who judges a bill unconstitutional is not the legislature, they propose bills that would eventually become law with the signature of the president. If the president veto than........you know the rest. If there is a challenge to that law then the courts decide the constitutionality of that law. That is what balance of power does. No one part of govt has more power that the other, in theory.
I'm open to any suggestions and have a difficult time accepting limitations without an honest effort on my part, you can count on that!
"iCan, iWill, iHave"
There are always choices, no bad ones, no good ones, only "great" ones,
"Oh, great!" :)
-
06-04-2014, 06:39 PM #16
- Join Date: Dec 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 57
- Posts: 22,621
- Rep Power: 47700
What's your take on Holder saying AG's needn't enforce laws with which they disagree?
http://www.salon.com/2014/02/25/eric...minatory_laws/I'm a sad little man
-
-
06-04-2014, 06:50 PM #17
-
06-05-2014, 09:45 PM #18
-
06-05-2014, 09:46 PM #19
-
06-05-2014, 09:47 PM #20
-
-
06-06-2014, 05:36 AM #21
-
06-06-2014, 05:53 AM #22
Actually it says a lot of the things I've argued for a while now. The Senators cater to the money now and not to the States. You can get outside monies and get the uninformed electorate to vote for you far easier than you can keep the State reps and Governor happy. Vastly removes power from the States and precisely where we really started to go off track.
Was friends with Methuselah
-
06-06-2014, 05:55 AM #23
-
06-06-2014, 06:03 AM #24
Similar Threads
-
Islam or Democracy?
By boseador in forum Religion and PoliticsReplies: 118Last Post: 09-20-2013, 06:50 AM -
Anti gun control: the LOUD minority.
By NormandyRoad in forum Religion and PoliticsReplies: 171Last Post: 04-19-2007, 05:47 AM
Bookmarks