australia.
you mad?
|
-
04-01-2013, 05:17 AM #61
-
04-01-2013, 05:19 AM #62
-
04-01-2013, 05:20 AM #63
LOL dude... you're silly. "China wouldn't touch the US" China (and maybe Russia) is probs the only reason the US hasn't addressed North Korea's threats. China is showing 8% growth in the current economy and rising. China has more than enough money to invest in warfare. Not saying China would win... but to say the US would come out untouched is ****ing retarded.
-
04-01-2013, 05:20 AM #64
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 13,593
- Rep Power: 17396
Why would the usa be safe when half the nations in the world would want to bomb them first? Somewhere in the middle of nowhere in Canada, Russia or Aus would probably be safest.
It also makes me laugh how a country that hasn't won a war on its own for decades and decades think it can take on the world. Please, one nuclear sub on its own would take out the eastern seaboard. People can fly planes into skyscrapers without your military realising, you think you would be able to stop hundreds of advanced missiles? lol.
-
-
04-01-2013, 05:22 AM #65
-
04-01-2013, 05:23 AM #66
-
04-01-2013, 05:28 AM #67
-
04-01-2013, 05:30 AM #68
-
-
04-01-2013, 05:32 AM #69
-
04-01-2013, 05:36 AM #70
-
04-01-2013, 05:36 AM #71
- Join Date: Dec 2008
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 6,211
- Rep Power: 6612
I'd say I'd stay in Canada because brahs of peace, but I have this sinking feeling that if sh*t were to pop off with NK (which would probably be what starts WW3), their poverty targeting systems would either hit us or Mexico
"If I was an NBA team I would sign Rudy Gay just so I could trade him and get better." - jross2021
2010 BB.com's Jiu Jitsu team
"Don't cry and quit. You're already in pain. You're already hurt. Get a reward for it"
-
04-01-2013, 05:36 AM #72
-
-
04-01-2013, 05:39 AM #73
-
04-01-2013, 05:41 AM #74
-
04-01-2013, 05:43 AM #75
-
04-01-2013, 05:43 AM #76
-
-
04-01-2013, 05:49 AM #77
-
04-01-2013, 05:51 AM #78
-
04-01-2013, 05:52 AM #79
-
04-01-2013, 05:54 AM #80
-
-
04-01-2013, 05:54 AM #81
-
04-01-2013, 05:58 AM #82
-
04-01-2013, 06:00 AM #83
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 11,933
- Rep Power: 73593
Strong lack of knowledge and common sense in this thread. The US would be the best option because:
1. Best ballistic missile defense (BMD) in the world, hands down. The US Navy's BMD ships will pretty much take care of any incoming ICBM. I'm not even mentioning the defense shield we have dedicated to BMD.
2. Our general populace is armed to the teeth. I personally own an AR-15, AK-47, and various other rifles, shotguns. Good luck invading China and Russia brahs. It'd be Red Dawn x1000000 IRL.
3. Everyone in the world knows that the US drives the world economy so the thought of invasion or even slinging nukes over our way would pretty much mean economic collapse for just about everyone.*SillieBazzillie isn't that bad of a guy Crew*
*STEM Master Race*
*Fly Navy Crew*
*Always Pick 5 Crew*
*STL Cardinals/Blues/MIZ-ZOU Crew*
-
04-01-2013, 06:02 AM #84
Are you aware that almost every man in Switzerland has gone through mandatory military service? Gun ownership is legal here and encouraged, in the event of a war almost every house turns into a bunker, with bomb shelters located under most houses and massive ammo bunkers located at regular locations through the country. Besides that many countries have serious investments in Switzerland and massive gold/diamond reserves.
So yeah.. not happening.watches/cigars/scotch
-
-
04-01-2013, 06:05 AM #85
-
04-01-2013, 06:06 AM #86
-
04-01-2013, 06:14 AM #87
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 11,933
- Rep Power: 73593
-
04-01-2013, 06:21 AM #88
-
-
04-01-2013, 06:21 AM #89
-
04-01-2013, 06:23 AM #90
Bookmarks