Hey all
I'm looking to know how to weigh pasta and rice and foods like this that weigh more when cooked, particularly these two
i have this wholewheat pasta that im looking to eat
it says on the back "75g of uncooked pasta weighs approximately 170g when cooked".. so if i enter this data into my online calorie counting journal (i am using myfitnesspal.com) of what 75g of raw pasta is and then enter for the serving size "170g", then weigh the pasta when it's cooked to whatever amount i desire (for example i weighed out 200g of cooked pasta last night) will the calorie counting data be approximately correct?
|
-
01-02-2013, 02:00 AM #1
- Join Date: Jun 2008
- Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 32
- Posts: 5,513
- Rep Power: 12406
How to weigh out cooked/uncooked pasta/rice etc when counting calories?
-
01-02-2013, 02:10 AM #2
-
01-02-2013, 02:38 AM #3
- Join Date: Jun 2008
- Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 32
- Posts: 5,513
- Rep Power: 12406
is a cooked approximation not okay?
i really want to cook in bulk and bring the food to work with me, if i weigh it from the fridge after cooking it will the approximate calculation be alright?
it would be a massive time saver for me as i hardly have enough time as it is
or should i just bring wholemeal granary bread to work and eat that instead?
-
01-02-2013, 02:40 AM #4
-
-
01-02-2013, 02:43 AM #5
-
01-02-2013, 02:46 AM #6
-
01-02-2013, 02:50 AM #7
-
01-02-2013, 02:52 AM #8
- Join Date: Jun 2008
- Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 32
- Posts: 5,513
- Rep Power: 12406
-
-
01-02-2013, 03:21 AM #9
-
01-02-2013, 03:22 AM #10
Just do what i did....find the conversion, for example, weigh out 100g raw, cook it then weigh it after cooked. I do this for everything that i cook in bulk.
Then its easy to calculate macros for COOKED weight....from my trials 100g of raw rice = 318g of cooked rice...so i just used a 3.18 conversion number to figure out weighted macros.
Either way whatever you do, just be consistent.★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
Misc Persian Crew
-->>MMC<<--
Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
M4L Krew Representing!~
RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
-
01-02-2013, 04:18 AM #11
-
01-02-2013, 04:22 AM #12
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Location: Spring, Texas, United States
- Posts: 931
- Rep Power: 1276
This is what i do for bulk cooking
weigh Raw and calc those macros
cook
divide into even portions by weight
divide previous macros by number of portions i made
each portion are these macrosIs wine not an essential macro?
Huge avi *******
"The gears will spin and the wheels they’ll turn. As long as I give my fire fuel to burn."
-
-
01-02-2013, 04:37 AM #13
-
01-02-2013, 04:45 AM #14
-
01-02-2013, 04:48 AM #15
That is from my own observation based off my way i cook my rice. As i said, i did a trial run of 100g raw rice to see what it would turn out to be cooked, it came to 318g. So i used 3.18 as a conversion figure and then found out macros of COOKED weight by dividing that 3.18 to the macros on the packet per 100g. Make sense?
★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
Misc Persian Crew
-->>MMC<<--
Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
M4L Krew Representing!~
RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
-
01-02-2013, 04:53 AM #16
-
-
01-02-2013, 04:55 AM #17
-
01-02-2013, 05:05 AM #18
When i bulk cook, i prefer to store it all in just 1 Tupperware container, store it in the fridge and when it's time to eat, just grab it from there and weigh it in a bowl/tupperwear container.
I don't weigh everything twice, i only did 1 trail where i weighed it raw and then again cooked to see the conversion figure. After that, i just figured out what 100g of COOKED rice was in terms of macros and have gone off that ever since. So whenever i go to the fridge and grab my cooked rice, i know that if i have 200g of COOKED rice, i know what macros are for it as i have already done the macro conversion.★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
Misc Persian Crew
-->>MMC<<--
Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
M4L Krew Representing!~
RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
-
01-02-2013, 05:23 AM #19
Here's a semi-related question I've been wondering. When I look up foods on nutritiondata.self.com, there are usually options for both raw and cooked. If I weigh it raw should I use the raw option when calculating macros, even though I eat it after it's been cooked? What's the point of having two different options for raw and cooked?
-
01-02-2013, 05:27 AM #20
If you are going off raw weight, use the raw macros, if you are going off cooked weight, go off the cooked macros.
Because food weight can change drastically after it is done cooking...most meats lose weight, whereas rice/pasta/oats all gain weight.
As for sites having cooked weight macros...i wouldn't trust it, if you want to weigh your food cooked, like i do, just trial it yourself. Grab 100g raw of watever it is (i.e 100g of Chicken Breast), cook it how you normally do, then immediately weigh it after it is cooked and find out the new weight. Then simple maths can work out the macros for the cooked weight of that food, provided you have the raw macros available.★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
Misc Persian Crew
-->>MMC<<--
Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
M4L Krew Representing!~
RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
-
-
01-02-2013, 08:45 AM #21
-
01-02-2013, 11:23 AM #22
-
01-28-2013, 06:35 PM #23
Ok. I'm pretty new to all this weighing stuff, and just learned today to weigh things raw. So let me make sure I'm completely understanding this.
You're rice weighs 100g uncooked with macros lets say Cal: 170, Carbs: 36, Fat: 12, Protein: 4
You then cook your 100g of rice, and after it has been cooked, it now weighs 318g. So you took 318/100 = 3.18.
Now you took the macros of 170, 36, 12, 4 and divided each of those by 3.18
So now the new cooked macros look like this: Cal: 53, Carb: 11, Fat: 1.2, Protein:1.2
Now in order to consume the macros that are on the label (the original), you would have to consume 1011 g of cooked rice?
Am I understanding this correctly? Sorry, I'm just really a noob to all this and trying to learn.
-
01-28-2013, 07:41 PM #24
-
-
01-28-2013, 07:49 PM #25
-
01-28-2013, 08:39 PM #26
Bookmarks