Reply
Results 1 to 26 of 26
  1. #1
    Registered User Tal106's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 32
    Posts: 5,513
    Rep Power: 12406
    Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Tal106 is offline

    How to weigh out cooked/uncooked pasta/rice etc when counting calories?

    Hey all

    I'm looking to know how to weigh pasta and rice and foods like this that weigh more when cooked, particularly these two

    i have this wholewheat pasta that im looking to eat

    it says on the back "75g of uncooked pasta weighs approximately 170g when cooked".. so if i enter this data into my online calorie counting journal (i am using myfitnesspal.com) of what 75g of raw pasta is and then enter for the serving size "170g", then weigh the pasta when it's cooked to whatever amount i desire (for example i weighed out 200g of cooked pasta last night) will the calorie counting data be approximately correct?
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User AlwaysTryin's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Posts: 37,268
    Rep Power: 57334
    AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    AlwaysTryin is offline
    Weigh it raw and use the raw nutritional info. Weigh all foods raw
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User Tal106's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 32
    Posts: 5,513
    Rep Power: 12406
    Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Tal106 is offline
    is a cooked approximation not okay?
    i really want to cook in bulk and bring the food to work with me, if i weigh it from the fridge after cooking it will the approximate calculation be alright?
    it would be a massive time saver for me as i hardly have enough time as it is
    or should i just bring wholemeal granary bread to work and eat that instead?
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User Almogmon's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2011
    Age: 29
    Posts: 953
    Rep Power: 182
    Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10) Almogmon is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    Almogmon is offline
    Originally Posted by Tal106 View Post
    is a cooked approximation not okay?
    i really want to cook in bulk and bring the food to work with me, if i weigh it from the fridge after cooking it will the approximate calculation be alright?
    no. Weigh it raw.
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User AlwaysTryin's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Posts: 37,268
    Rep Power: 57334
    AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) AlwaysTryin has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    AlwaysTryin is offline
    Originally Posted by Tal106 View Post
    is a cooked approximation not okay?
    i really want to cook in bulk and bring the food to work with me, if i weigh it from the fridge after cooking it will the approximate calculation be alright?
    it would be a massive time saver for me as i hardly have enough time as it is
    or should i just bring wholemeal granary bread to work and eat that instead?
    You can weigh raw and cook in bulk you know...
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User Makween's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 36
    Posts: 1,115
    Rep Power: 1107
    Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Makween is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    Makween is offline
    Originally Posted by Tal106 View Post
    is a cooked approximation not okay?
    i really want to cook in bulk and bring the food to work with me, if i weigh it from the fridge after cooking it will the approximate calculation be alright?
    it would be a massive time saver for me as i hardly have enough time as it is
    or should i just bring wholemeal granary bread to work and eat that instead?
    You're stressing over things that don't matter.

    Weigh raw and cook in bulk. In practice not every serving will be exactly the same size, but they'll balance out over time.
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Registered User Tal106's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 32
    Posts: 5,513
    Rep Power: 12406
    Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Tal106 is offline
    Originally Posted by AlwaysTryin View Post
    You can weigh raw and cook in bulk you know...
    but wont i have to cook it in bulk in different pots? by bulk i meant one huge pot meaning i would have to weigh it again after anyway
    surely using the cooked measurement on my fitness pal can't make that much of a caloric difference?
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Registered User Tal106's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 32
    Posts: 5,513
    Rep Power: 12406
    Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Tal106 is offline
    Originally Posted by Makween View Post
    You're stressing over things that don't matter.

    Weigh raw and cook in bulk. In practice not every serving will be exactly the same size, but they'll balance out over time.
    true, i will make sure to weigh it out raw next time though but im already in work so the cooked serving weighed will have to do

    maybe i'll just take bread to work since that is easier to measure saving me valuable time in the morning, and then weigh raw pasta in the evening
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Registered User LukeTyson's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2011
    Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Age: 33
    Posts: 22
    Rep Power: 0
    LukeTyson has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    LukeTyson is offline
    Originally Posted by Tal106 View Post
    but wont i have to cook it in bulk in different pots? by bulk i meant one huge pot meaning i would have to weigh it again after anyway
    surely using the cooked measurement on my fitness pal can't make that much of a caloric difference?
    How many servings per pack ? Split cooked pasta in number of servings ?
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    MMC's Mr.O KouRon's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Melbourne, Australia
    Age: 33
    Posts: 6,430
    Rep Power: 8931
    KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000)
    KouRon is offline
    Just do what i did....find the conversion, for example, weigh out 100g raw, cook it then weigh it after cooked. I do this for everything that i cook in bulk.

    Then its easy to calculate macros for COOKED weight....from my trials 100g of raw rice = 318g of cooked rice...so i just used a 3.18 conversion number to figure out weighted macros.

    Either way whatever you do, just be consistent.
    ★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
    No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
    Misc Persian Crew
    -->>MMC<<--
    Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
    M4L Krew Representing!~
    RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    978-867-5309👌 devilbones's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
    Posts: 4,090
    Rep Power: 1313337
    devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz
    devilbones is offline
    Originally Posted by KouRon View Post
    Just do what i did....find the conversion, for example, weigh out 100g raw, cook it then weigh it after cooked. I do this for everything that i cook in bulk.

    Then its easy to calculate macros for COOKED weight....from my trials 100g of raw rice = 318g of cooked rice...so i just used a 3.18 conversion number to figure out weighted macros.

    Either way whatever you do, just be consistent.
    Wait, what are you doing here?
    USMC/USN Crew
    MWC
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Wino Bodybuilding cldillmann1's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2012
    Location: Spring, Texas, United States
    Posts: 931
    Rep Power: 1276
    cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000) cldillmann1 is just really nice. (+1000)
    cldillmann1 is offline
    This is what i do for bulk cooking

    weigh Raw and calc those macros

    cook

    divide into even portions by weight

    divide previous macros by number of portions i made

    each portion are these macros
    Is wine not an essential macro?

    Huge avi *******

    "The gears will spin and the wheels they’ll turn. As long as I give my fire fuel to burn."
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    MMC's Mr.O KouRon's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Melbourne, Australia
    Age: 33
    Posts: 6,430
    Rep Power: 8931
    KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000)
    KouRon is offline
    Originally Posted by devilbones View Post
    Wait, what are you doing here?
    What don't you understand?
    ★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
    No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
    Misc Persian Crew
    -->>MMC<<--
    Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
    M4L Krew Representing!~
    RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
    Reply With Quote

  14. #14
    978-867-5309👌 devilbones's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
    Posts: 4,090
    Rep Power: 1313337
    devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz
    devilbones is offline
    Originally Posted by KouRon View Post
    What don't you understand?
    Where does the 3.18 come into play with rice? Are you saying that you are dividing the cooked weight by 3.18 to find out your macros?
    USMC/USN Crew
    MWC
    Reply With Quote

  15. #15
    MMC's Mr.O KouRon's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Melbourne, Australia
    Age: 33
    Posts: 6,430
    Rep Power: 8931
    KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000)
    KouRon is offline
    Originally Posted by devilbones View Post
    Where does the 3.18 come into play with rice? Are you saying that you are dividing the cooked weight by 3.18 to find out your macros?
    That is from my own observation based off my way i cook my rice. As i said, i did a trial run of 100g raw rice to see what it would turn out to be cooked, it came to 318g. So i used 3.18 as a conversion figure and then found out macros of COOKED weight by dividing that 3.18 to the macros on the packet per 100g. Make sense?
    ★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
    No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
    Misc Persian Crew
    -->>MMC<<--
    Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
    M4L Krew Representing!~
    RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
    Reply With Quote

  16. #16
    978-867-5309👌 devilbones's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
    Posts: 4,090
    Rep Power: 1313337
    devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz devilbones has the mod powerz
    devilbones is offline
    Originally Posted by KouRon View Post
    That is from my own observation based off my way i cook my rice. As i said, i did a trial run of 100g raw rice to see what it would turn out to be cooked, it came to 318g. So i used 3.18 as a conversion figure and then found out macros of COOKED weight by dividing that 3.18 to the macros on the packet per 100g. Make sense?
    Totally. Thats a really cool method and easy way to figure out macros for cooked weight if you are cooking in bulk. I have just weighed the bulk, cooked it, divided equally and then divided up the macros.
    USMC/USN Crew
    MWC
    Reply With Quote

  17. #17
    Bulking Dielikeadog's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2009
    Posts: 1,761
    Rep Power: 650
    Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Dielikeadog has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    Dielikeadog is offline
    if you're eating everything your cooking why would you weigh it twice?
    Only uses barbell crew
    misc beard crew
    Reply With Quote

  18. #18
    MMC's Mr.O KouRon's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Melbourne, Australia
    Age: 33
    Posts: 6,430
    Rep Power: 8931
    KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000)
    KouRon is offline
    Originally Posted by devilbones View Post
    Totally. Thats a really cool method and easy way to figure out macros for cooked weight if you are cooking in bulk. I have just weighed the bulk, cooked it, divided equally and then divided up the macros.
    When i bulk cook, i prefer to store it all in just 1 Tupperware container, store it in the fridge and when it's time to eat, just grab it from there and weigh it in a bowl/tupperwear container.

    Originally Posted by Dielikeadog View Post
    if you're eating everything your cooking why would you weigh it twice?
    I don't weigh everything twice, i only did 1 trail where i weighed it raw and then again cooked to see the conversion figure. After that, i just figured out what 100g of COOKED rice was in terms of macros and have gone off that ever since. So whenever i go to the fridge and grab my cooked rice, i know that if i have 200g of COOKED rice, i know what macros are for it as i have already done the macro conversion.
    ★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
    No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
    Misc Persian Crew
    -->>MMC<<--
    Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
    M4L Krew Representing!~
    RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
    Reply With Quote

  19. #19
    Registered User tom626's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2012
    Age: 35
    Posts: 927
    Rep Power: 258
    tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50) tom626 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    tom626 is offline
    Here's a semi-related question I've been wondering. When I look up foods on nutritiondata.self.com, there are usually options for both raw and cooked. If I weigh it raw should I use the raw option when calculating macros, even though I eat it after it's been cooked? What's the point of having two different options for raw and cooked?
    Reply With Quote

  20. #20
    MMC's Mr.O KouRon's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Melbourne, Australia
    Age: 33
    Posts: 6,430
    Rep Power: 8931
    KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000) KouRon is a name known to all. (+5000)
    KouRon is offline
    Originally Posted by tom626 View Post
    Here's a semi-related question I've been wondering. When I look up foods on nutritiondata.self.com, there are usually options for both raw and cooked. If I weigh it raw should I use the raw option when calculating macros, even though I eat it after it's been cooked? What's the point of having two different options for raw and cooked?
    If you are going off raw weight, use the raw macros, if you are going off cooked weight, go off the cooked macros.

    Because food weight can change drastically after it is done cooking...most meats lose weight, whereas rice/pasta/oats all gain weight.

    As for sites having cooked weight macros...i wouldn't trust it, if you want to weigh your food cooked, like i do, just trial it yourself. Grab 100g raw of watever it is (i.e 100g of Chicken Breast), cook it how you normally do, then immediately weigh it after it is cooked and find out the new weight. Then simple maths can work out the macros for the cooked weight of that food, provided you have the raw macros available.
    ★★★ I was part of Ultra 2013 Thread Crew ★★★
    No Fap October 2012 COMPLETED!
    Misc Persian Crew
    -->>MMC<<--
    Dorian Yates training = The only way to train!
    M4L Krew Representing!~
    RIP - Az "Zyzz" Sergeyevich :( , The god has fallen, but the legend lives on! <3
    Reply With Quote

  21. #21
    Registered User Tal106's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Age: 32
    Posts: 5,513
    Rep Power: 12406
    Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Tal106 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Tal106 is offline
    Originally Posted by AlwaysTryin View Post
    Weigh it raw and use the raw nutritional info. Weigh all foods raw
    i think i will just do this from now on for simplicity
    Reply With Quote

  22. #22
    Registered User Naeem11's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2011
    Location: Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,020
    Rep Power: 480
    Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) Naeem11 has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    Naeem11 is offline
    Do what I do for rice......say I make 7 servings of rice. I weigh it raw, cook it.....then re-weigh all of the rice and divide by 7.....bam, got my portions.
    "I think, therefore I am" - René Descartes
    Reply With Quote

  23. #23
    Registered User cmsgtamn's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2007
    Location: United States
    Age: 40
    Posts: 40
    Rep Power: 0
    cmsgtamn has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) cmsgtamn has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    cmsgtamn is offline
    Originally Posted by KouRon View Post
    That is from my own observation based off my way i cook my rice. As i said, i did a trial run of 100g raw rice to see what it would turn out to be cooked, it came to 318g. So i used 3.18 as a conversion figure and then found out macros of COOKED weight by dividing that 3.18 to the macros on the packet per 100g. Make sense?
    Ok. I'm pretty new to all this weighing stuff, and just learned today to weigh things raw. So let me make sure I'm completely understanding this.

    You're rice weighs 100g uncooked with macros lets say Cal: 170, Carbs: 36, Fat: 12, Protein: 4

    You then cook your 100g of rice, and after it has been cooked, it now weighs 318g. So you took 318/100 = 3.18.

    Now you took the macros of 170, 36, 12, 4 and divided each of those by 3.18

    So now the new cooked macros look like this: Cal: 53, Carb: 11, Fat: 1.2, Protein:1.2

    Now in order to consume the macros that are on the label (the original), you would have to consume 1011 g of cooked rice?

    Am I understanding this correctly? Sorry, I'm just really a noob to all this and trying to learn.
    Reply With Quote

  24. #24
    Registered User MetilHed's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2012
    Posts: 4,999
    Rep Power: 14910
    MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) MetilHed is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    MetilHed is offline
    Originally Posted by cmsgtamn View Post
    Ok. I'm pretty new to all this weighing stuff, and just learned today to weigh things raw. So let me make sure I'm completely understanding this.

    You're rice weighs 100g uncooked with macros lets say Cal: 170, Carbs: 36, Fat: 12, Protein: 4

    You then cook your 100g of rice, and after it has been cooked, it now weighs 318g. So you took 318/100 = 3.18.

    Now you took the macros of 170, 36, 12, 4 and divided each of those by 3.18

    So now the new cooked macros look like this: Cal: 53, Carb: 11, Fat: 1.2, Protein:1.2

    Now in order to consume the macros that are on the label (the original), you would have to consume 1011 g of cooked rice?

    Am I understanding this correctly? Sorry, I'm just really a noob to all this and trying to learn.
    Dont divide the macros by 3.18. Just the weight
    Reply With Quote

  25. #25
    Registered User cmsgtamn's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2007
    Location: United States
    Age: 40
    Posts: 40
    Rep Power: 0
    cmsgtamn has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) cmsgtamn has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    cmsgtamn is offline
    Divide the macros by the weight of 318? That doesn't seem right. The macros would be way too small. Could you please break it down like I'm the world's dumbest person, because that's pretty much what I feel like in all of this.
    Reply With Quote

  26. #26
    At the Nutrition Section BroFoods's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Posts: 127
    Rep Power: 244
    BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50) BroFoods will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    BroFoods is offline
    Here's what I've found to work.

    White minute rice = 36 calories per ounce cooked
    Brown minute rice = 33 calories per ounce cooked
    Penne, rigatoni, and other non string style pasta = 50 calories per ounce cooked
    Spaghetti, Angel hair, etc = 53 calories per ounce cooked.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts