I think Olympic weightlifting could fare a little better, especially for the guys who weigh 100+ kilos. Instead of changing every few years and reducing the weight classes, the IWF should share the same weight classes as the IPF.
Post 2011 IPF Weight Classes
Men; 59 kg, 66 kg, 74 kg, 83 kg, 93 kg, 105 kg, 120 kg, 120 kg+
Women; 47 kg, 52 kg, 57 kg, 63 kg, 72 kg, 84 kg, 84 kg +
As compared to the current IWF weight classes...
Men; 56 kg, 62 kg, 69 kg, 77 kg, 85 kg, 94 kg, 105 kg, 105+ kg
Women; 48 kg, 53 kg, 58 kg, 63 kg, 69 kg, 75 kg, 75+ kg
|
-
05-22-2012, 05:21 PM #1
Why doesn't the IWF adopt the 2011 IPF weight classes?
snapchat - alsthetics
-
05-22-2012, 05:35 PM #2
-
05-22-2012, 05:52 PM #3
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: Sarasota, Florida, United States
- Posts: 3,208
- Rep Power: 2692
nooooooooooooooo
then i would have to cut an extra kilo, lol
I do think they should add a 120 or a 125 class and then a shw class thoughBryan
Captain of the Comeback Train
Comeback Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=159651791
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/STRONGMANbarry/videos
-
05-22-2012, 06:21 PM #4
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 1,322
- Rep Power: 2122
we fear change.
id say not to because they might wipe the records again. fk thatCompetition lifts @ 94kgs: 130/161
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3waltiger
fordømt ... for alltid. tenker på det. prøve å forestille slutten av evigheten. lukk øynene. Lukk øynene og prøv å forestille seg. for alltid. smerte. for alltid.
-
-
05-22-2012, 07:02 PM #5
-
05-22-2012, 07:31 PM #6
There are over 200 member countries in the IWF and many, if not most, have smaller people than the US. Look at the Asians. As it is, the SHWT class probably has the least depth worldwide, the 105s may be next.
I expect it would be very similar for the women. Our top supers place fairly high internationally, there just are not a lot of big, and athletic, women.
Besides, there is no way the IPF will drive the IWF.
-
05-23-2012, 12:55 AM #7
-
05-23-2012, 03:15 AM #8
-
-
05-23-2012, 05:46 AM #9
-
05-23-2012, 07:04 AM #10
The records would have to be changed if the weight classes changed. You can't really add a weight class; weightlifting only gets so about 450 spots in the Olympics (don't quote me on this number as it might not be exact) so just adding a weight class would reduce the number of lifters in other classes.
- Impossible is lifting up your country
-
05-23-2012, 06:36 PM #11
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 14,092
- Rep Power: 7935
A grand majority of powerlifting in the IPF also occurs outside the United States. The IPF weight classes are similarly more stacked towards the bottom. Your stereotypical fat bald 'hardcore' powerlifter does not lift in the IPF.
I think if anything the IPF should've changed theirs to more closely resemble the IWF, especially for women's. I wouldn't be surprised if over half of IPF women were under 60kg and the classes should reflect that
-
05-23-2012, 06:47 PM #12
-
-
05-24-2012, 06:57 AM #13
Interestingly, because of the numbers game, there was talk, just talk, of alternating weight classes each Olympiad.
For example: 56, 69, 85 and 105 in 2016 and 62, 77, 94 and 105+ in 2020. Can't beleive that would ever happen, but they did talk about it. Probably in response to the possibility that weightlifting slots woud be cut further.
-
05-24-2012, 07:07 AM #14
Bookmarks