Post your goal physique!

[Lvisaa2]

Are you referring to the BB'er I posted? That's Aaron Curtis and yes he got banned for 1,3. As to if he is natty, I don't know/care. I think it is possible that he is natty.

[phal]

IIRC he's been training for ~14 years. To put that into perspective for 99% of us that post here.

[mannydawg]

Since it was brought up what are the benefits of 1,3?

[ErickStevens]

Since it was brought up what are the benefits of 1,3?

Erectile dysfunction.

[ErickStevens]

Another awesome Luke Ehlis pic:

[sawoobley]

Another awesome Luke Ehlis pic:

Hypertrophy in his thoracolumbar fascia? Is this real life? lol

[MarkVI]

Hypertrophy in his thoracolumbar fascia? Is this real life? lol

I think it must be lol

[Lvisaa2]

I just saw this picture of Sergio and mind=blown. Dude was so far ahead of his time, imo. Looks amazing here -




(strong bump)

[PBateman2]

^^Sergio probably my all time favorite. Great great physique with a powerful overall look. Perfection.

[Chuck2600]

[determined4000]

[SimonThePieman]

Phal.jog

[mattypoole]

Impossible without dat dare and what I'd imagine are freak genetics, but yeah would be cool to be that big even if only for a short time.

[likeawashboard]

Not one thing to improve on IMO

Definitely ideal physique.

[ErickStevens]

Artist's rendition of Eric v 2.013...

[JasonDB]

Methinks a lot of people misread the title fo the thread. It says goal physique... that means you plan on achieving it. If you say "requires that thar but I want to stay natty" or "I don't hve the right structure and insertions" it isn't your goal physique. Just saying. ;-)

[mattypoole]

Methinks a lot of people misread the title fo the thread. It says goal physique... that means you plan on achieving it. If you say "requires that thar but I want to stay natty" or "I don't hve the right structure and insertions" it isn't your goal physique. Just saying. ;-)

Fair point man "

On a different note, I think the bb.com store have some great supplements, keen to try them some time.

[MiscDemeanor]

I think Jennifer Nicole Lee looks amazing

[Chuck2600]

Methinks a lot of people misread the title fo the thread. It says goal physique... that means you plan on achieving it. If you say "requires that thar but I want to stay natty" or "I don't hve the right structure and insertions" it isn't your goal physique. Just saying. ;-)

Well obviously no two people will have the same structure and insertions but size and leaness is another thing. When I see physiques I like I prefer to think about it as my goal in terms of size and leaness. I tend to favour guys my height too so it's more realistic, albeit Kane isn't but hes just a sick kant anyways.

[dizzzane]

no two people will have the same structure and insertions but size and leaness is another thing.

That's what she said?

[illiniStrive]

I think Jennifer Nicole Lee looks amazing

[IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com/35mpszo.jpg[/ IMG]

[IMG]http://i43.tinypic.com/2vjwlkz.jpg[/ IMG]

JNL is awesome, but I just luuuuurve Nicole Wilkins Lee (a bit more muscle since she's a figure competitor).

Not sure if natty tho. As an IFBB pro there's always speculation... she's pretty teeny in real life, so who knows.

[dizzzane]

I just couldn't be content with that level of muscle, no matter how lean or aesthetic. Even at 55 or 60 years old I really and truely hope I am not that frail looking. (100% srs)... I actually have a hangup about looking frail/weak or being frail/weak. It scares the **** out of me. Losing all my strength when really sick a couple years back was one of my worst nightmares come true.

Physique like that when I see them I do not consider that they might workout... all I see is a coke or cancer/aids ridden body or a concentration camp victom.... just skin and bones.... and I weep a little on the inside imagining starving down like that.

Geez a little insulting don't you think? I mean sure it's not YOUR ideal physique but at the same time, I'd hate to be ~20% bodyfat even if I could bench 4pps. Even still, I wouldn't tell you your goal physique sucks or "I'd hate myself if I looked like that." Its all about a person's perception and the wants of the individual. Sounds like you are above everyone because you lift for power. This reminds of the recent thread about lifting for strength/power or for aesthetics. People are making it sound like being single digit body fat and not weighing 200lbs+ means a person is just lifting like a pussy and trying to get a 6 pack for the beach. Not really sure how a guy weighing 150lbs benching 275 is any less impressive than a guy weighing 220lbs benching 405. From here on, I judge an individuals strength based on how many muscle ups one can do. If you can't do one... drop some body fat or get stronger *******s!

[JasonDB]

Geez a little insulting don't you think? I mean sure it's not YOUR ideal physique but at the same time, I'd hate to be ~20% bodyfat even if I could bench 4pps. Even still, I wouldn't tell you your goal physique sucks or "I'd hate myself if I looked like that." Its all about a person's perception and the wants of the individual. Sounds like you are above everyone because you lift for power. This reminds of the recent thread about lifting for strength/power or for aesthetics. People are making it sound like being single digit body fat and not weighing 200lbs+ means a person is just lifting like a pussy and trying to get a 6 pack for the beach. Not really sure how a guy weighing 150lbs benching 275 is any less impressive than a guy weighing 220lbs benching 405. From here on, I judge an individuals strength based on how many muscle ups one can do. If you can't do one... drop some body fat or get stronger *******s!

I have an actual phobia/terror of being small/weak and muscle dismorphia. I do not see a person who trains in that picture. I see a skeleton with skin streched across it. That isn't ment as an insult is what my muscle dismorphia sees. Relative strength at those type of bodyweights is an excuse to not try to get larger or stronger by intent. A 150 lbs guy who benched 425 and squats 600 though would be impressive though, but my first question would be "What would happen if he ate more? Why is he intentionally limiting himself just to remain at such a bodyweight? Cell tech + more calories and he would be a beast."

I will also point out again people have in posts in the Nut Misc reminded me a number of times how unimpressive I was a decade ago... that I was just big but fat an unaesthetic. Should I be insulted or should I have done what I did and admit they were right and that in the future when bulking I should use better dieting methods. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, if I can't be thick skinned about it I really shouldn't be posting on the internet. If I tell you you are tiny at 154 lbs, either be more thick skinned about it and laugh it off, or do something about it and put some size on if it actually bothers you that I said it.

Also I neither know nor care what a muscle up is, you mad bro? ;-)

[PBateman2]

Methinks a lot of people misread the title fo the thread. It says goal physique... that means you plan on achieving it. If you say "requires that thar but I want to stay natty" or "I don't hve the right structure and insertions" it isn't your goal physique. Just saying. ;-)

True...but I look at it kinda differently. Goal, admire, etc.. whatever.

My goal physique is Frank McGrath but I know I'll never be 250lbs and lean.....






Thats ok though. Keeps me motivated and driven to get stronger, leaner, faster, improve endurance, etc..

That's all I need.

[JasonDB]

True...but I look at it kinda differently. Goal, admire, etc.. whatever.

My goal physique is Frank McGrath but I know I'll never be 250lbs and lean.....








Thats ok though. Keeps me motivated and driven to get stronger, leaner, faster, improve endurance, etc..

That's all I need.

Manu you just need more chocolate milk and to keep adding weight to those sick lifts.

[PBateman2]

Manu you just need more chocolate milk and to keep adding weight to those sick lifts.

LOL....you win

[BunkMoreland]

[illiniStrive]

Ur doin it wrong. See, you definitely need to stop lifting for ^ to happen.





I do love me some Brad tho <3333

[hankst]

Ur doin it wrong. See, you definitely need to stop lifting for ^ to happen.


I do love me some Brad tho <3333

I think he is talking about the guy in the far right, not Brad.

[Lvisaa2]

Methinks a lot of people misread the title fo the thread. It says goal physique... that means you plan on achieving it. If you say "requires that thar but I want to stay natty" or "I don't hve the right structure and insertions" it isn't your goal physique. Just saying. ;-)

Uhh,

noun. 1. the result or achievement toward which effort is directed;

You can direct your effort towards something without it being attainable. I've seen different numbers for Sergio, but 5'10'', 227 on stage is the last one I saw. One calculator put me at 217 @ 10% being my maximum potential. That is pretty damn close.

Also, you keep bringing up that people have commented on the way you used to look. I know of two people that have(myself and Chad), mine was simply to point out you constantly were ragging on Zyzz, but many would find his physique more appealing. That says nothing about you other than some people would prefer his physique. It is not like people are constantly commenting on how you used to look or negatively commenting on it, yet you bring it up as a rationalization to harp on others. IMO, people can do as they like in training/diet, will I have the same goals? No, but that doesn't make them 'wrong'.