Active insufficiency is the inability of a biarticulate muscle to contract properly because it is not stretched enough.
For example, bend you elbow and your wrist and try to make a fist. You can't. Why?
Because the flexors in your forearm are in a position in which they are shortened and thus they cannot move the joint in question (make the fist).
This of course is valid only for muscles that move more than 1 joint.
The practical effect for bodybuilding is that some exercises are not really effective when the muscle in question is not stretched sufficiently.
I'll write 3 examples:
- your hamstring is not stretched when you squat (because the bend at the hip is "counterbalanced" by the bend at the knee) thus squat is not the best exercise to hit the hamstring. Good exercises specifically for the hamstring are e.g. good morning or stiffed legs deadlift, in which the hamstring works in a stretched position.
- biceps. Biceps works on 3 joints. Consider that the short head of the biceps (the internal one) works even to flex (raise) the shoulder. Its contribution is minimal, but the point is that this short head cannot be worked effectively if you flex your elbow (curl) when your shoulder is raised.
This means that exercises like preacher curls, concentration curls, cheat curl (raising the elbow before flexing it) and even chin ups are not really effective on the short head of the biceps.
For this kind of curl much of the load is moved to the brachialis, and away from the biceps.
- triceps. The long head of the triceps (that acts on 2 joints) can be worked effectively only when it is stretched. That's why you need to do skullcrushers/extensions etc. and on the other hand, benching does not work (enough) the long head.
Feel free to comment.
10-15-2011, 08:10 AM #1
ACTIVE INSUFFICIENCY - simple explanation3k+
10-15-2011, 09:36 AM #2
So you are supporting...
1) the common belief that stretching is beneficial?
2) that certain movements should be performed because they increase emphasis on certain muscle heads?
...Bodybuilding is 60% training and 50% diet. Yes that adds up to 110%, because that's what you should be giving it. Change the inside, and the physique will follow.
10-15-2011, 10:17 AM #3
your hamstring is not stretched when you squat (because the bend at the hip is "counterbalanced" by the bend at the knee) thus squat is not the best exercise to hit the hamstring. Good exercises specifically for the hamstring are e.g. good morning or stiffed legs deadlift, in which the hamstring works in a stretched position.
Recipricol inhabition. Hams don't work through most of the squat because they are neurally turned off. Not because they are not stretched.
10-15-2011, 10:21 AM #4
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Lakeland, Florida, United States
- Age: 32
- Posts: 56,182
- Rep Power: 177264
Not sure what point you're making with the post, other than just bringing the info to the surface and talking about it.
Either way, I agree with it, also made me think why the PLer style squat is better for hams then the Oly style.
My guess is with the hips pushing backwards and the wider stance, the hamstrings are stretched more during the movement than with oly style.-
Alchemist of Alcohol
10-15-2011, 11:50 AM #5
2) yes, that certain muscle [heads] receive much more emphasis in certain movements: they need a certain position to be activated more effectively.
This should be taken in consideration when choosing an exercise, e.g. if you want to hit your biceps then preacher curls is not the best choice.
Even if there's a head of the quad that raises the leg, I would think there's no reciprocal inhibition quad-hamstring because they don't work around the same joint at the same time.
Feel free to tell me if I'm wrong.
And yes, with the powerlifting squat you bend your hip joint much more and this stretches the hamstring more than in the Olympic squat.3k+
10-15-2011, 12:18 PM #6
10-15-2011, 08:20 PM #7
10-16-2011, 12:27 AM #8
11-09-2013, 06:51 PM #9
Though the hamstrings are not fully activated, doesn't mean they aren't activated at all (Recipricol Inhibition). The hamstrings are actually contracting isometrically developing enough force to keep you in the squat position. without the hamstrings, you would simply fall over. They are activated throughout the whole squat cycle.
(source -I'm an Exercise Scientist)
By jcoira in forum SupplementsReplies: 52Last Post: 03-24-2008, 05:19 PM
By BlackMountain in forum ExercisesReplies: 23Last Post: 06-14-2007, 04:07 AM
By welshace13 in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 42Last Post: 08-27-2006, 08:54 PM