I was doing Cable Crossover as a chest exercise in my program for a long time . But last time while i was doing Cable Crossover two guys ( they call their self " experienced " ) started talking to me " are u crazy , that exercise is for people who have big chest " and also they said that i shoudn't do that exercise .
Is that true ? or they are just some *******s
|
Thread: Cable Crossover
-
06-12-2011, 09:07 AM #1
Cable Crossover
-
06-12-2011, 09:12 AM #2
-
06-12-2011, 09:13 AM #3
-
06-12-2011, 09:14 AM #4
- Join Date: Aug 2005
- Location: District Of Columbia, United States
- Posts: 26,327
- Rep Power: 35173
-
-
06-12-2011, 09:27 AM #5
-
06-12-2011, 09:35 AM #6
-
06-12-2011, 11:41 AM #7
-
06-12-2011, 11:45 AM #8
-
-
06-12-2011, 12:05 PM #9
-
06-12-2011, 12:49 PM #10
-
06-12-2011, 01:57 PM #11
-
06-12-2011, 02:01 PM #12
-
-
06-12-2011, 02:10 PM #13
-
06-12-2011, 02:14 PM #14
lol <_<;
1. Get your list of exercises from this website
2. Lift intensely and ignore everyone else in the gym
3. ???
4. Profit!أشهد أن لا إله إلاَّ الله و أشهد أن محمد رسول الله
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🚷 Anti-Degeneracy League 🚷
https://www.twitter.com/eyeonpalestine
Mossad acronym: ISIS AKA Israeli Secret Intelligence Service
-
06-12-2011, 02:14 PM #15
-
06-12-2011, 02:17 PM #16
-
-
06-12-2011, 02:22 PM #17
-
06-12-2011, 02:23 PM #18
-
06-12-2011, 02:36 PM #19
-
06-12-2011, 05:31 PM #20
At first thanks all of you for your time and your answers . I started the Kris Gethin cutting program yesterday and in the second week there is a cable crossover as chest exercise . So that's why i got a bit confused . I will follow his program properly for 12 week and see the results .
Thanks again !
Keko
-
-
06-12-2011, 08:03 PM #21
-
06-12-2011, 08:09 PM #22
I think it is hysterical when people warn against an exercise because it builds bulk. As if your gonna wake up the next morning with a 20 in. larger chest and say what the f*** I should have listened to those guys in the gym. Anyone who proposes that an exercise will get you big so fast that you will be unhappy with it is an idiot. It reminds me of the people who don't lift weights because they "don't wanna get too big", like that crap happens overnight. Don't listen to them, crossovers are a great exercise.
-
06-13-2011, 02:16 AM #23
Actually, it wasn't sarcasm. Maybe my comment was a bit to blunt, but it was based on the avi, age, stats, and OP saying he was a beginner; and a few more things.
OP mentioned "bodybuilding". I'm always very happy to discuss bodybuilding, always open minded and the last to discard anything definitely. The guy is lifting for 6 months. IMO, there's one reason for a person that young and new to do crossovers: great potential and ambitions; and guidance and plan from that early on. The second reason for a "relative newb" to focus on them is poorly responsive chest. Crossovers and similar exercises can do a good job "waking up" such pecs. But it can(and usually does) take more than 6 months to come up with such conclusion.
Here we have a beginner who had the need to ask this question. That says something. He is probably doing some split that compared to what he should be doing will not bring results as good. Now, there's that thing that beginners will grow doing pretty much anything. He may end up fooling himself that crossovers did wonders. Cable crossovers have NOWHERE near the mass building potential as presses, flies and dips. He should at least focus on the "best basic moves". Any of those and their variations, one on one, beat crossovers 90+ % of the time. There have been examples of doing them as the main thing with great results, but that's not something you see or hear about every day. It is an exercise that may change the appearance of your inner chest relatively fast if you focus on them, but i doubt he even knows why he does crossovers, and that can't compare with what a basic chest program can do for him now.
So, will there be harm for him doing them-probably not at all for him to worry about. Can he do better without them-absolutely.
EDIT: just saw that OP is "cutting"Last edited by ZoranM; 06-13-2011 at 02:33 AM.
bb.com, a place that turned Deadlift into a forearm isolation exercise
and a place where 99% of 21 year olds have bad back and knees.
-
06-13-2011, 03:56 AM #24
-
-
06-13-2011, 06:23 AM #25
-
06-13-2011, 06:49 AM #26
- Join Date: Oct 2008
- Location: Massachusetts, United States
- Posts: 3,201
- Rep Power: 7841
I actually see it as the opposite. I think not doing them will lead to good results as long as he presses, but I can only see the results being better if he were to include these. Many inexperienced guys, as you touched on, have difficulty actually hitting the pecs with pressing movements out of inability to properly contract them. So something like flys/crossovers can help to flesh out their routine.
Use the tools of the trade to help you. I use devices such as chalk for grip strength, gloves, wrist straps, lifting belts - if it helps you lift more, it's all good. - Ronnie Coleman, Hardcore, 2007 Triumph Books
Biggest question in bodybuilding: Whaddaya bench? As I've said before, it doesn't matter how much you bench; it matters how much you [i]look[/i] like you bench... There's no round on stage that's the benchpress round. - Bob Chicherillo, World Class Physique, CMG
-
06-13-2011, 07:02 AM #27
Roughly, yes.
I guess i was vague when i said without them, i meant with something better instead. I still stand by my the initial opinion that he should do DB flies instead(that's if he has a chest day or similar). Crossovers are an alternative, yes, if we wanna look at these two that way, BUT, when it comes to mass building potential for beginners/relative beginners, no freaking way a cable crossover is at the same level as db fly.bb.com, a place that turned Deadlift into a forearm isolation exercise
and a place where 99% of 21 year olds have bad back and knees.
-
06-13-2011, 07:16 AM #28
I don't think it matters much. Pec deck, DB flyes, crossovers are all in the same boat as far as Im concerned. Any one is suitable after presses. I have not seen enough of a difference between various movements over the years to lead me to believe that any are inherently better than the others.
Who was this love of yours?
-
-
06-13-2011, 07:23 AM #29
This, and only for a few weeks at a time. It's nice sometimes, but it's not the type of exercise that will do a lot for mass development. I tend to use it to focus on the crossover portion of the movement because it's not a part of the ROM that gets hit in other areas. It's not an "inner chest" thing, but it is nice for stimulation with a pump. It's not really a big deal. No reason to trash it.
-
06-13-2011, 07:50 AM #30
I don't believe you , because i've been seeing you post for 2 years now. You gotta have a preference on a given period, or day even? And why? (at least based on feeling)How do you choose what to do?
I do see and feel the difference. I often liked doing a DB fly based session and pressing with what's left in the tank, without even looking at such sessions as pre-exhaust, for me that does a lot of good. I have a preference for each of those non-presses, but i'd pull a JasonDB if i start typing about it
Oh, does it really seem irrelevant to all that we are talking about a trainee with 6 months experience on a cut?bb.com, a place that turned Deadlift into a forearm isolation exercise
and a place where 99% of 21 year olds have bad back and knees.
Similar Threads
-
Anyone have a cable crossover in their home???
By jackednewyorker in forum Workout EquipmentReplies: 22Last Post: 03-09-2004, 11:50 AM -
building a cable crossover ne ideas?
By gymboyjb717 in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 7Last Post: 07-29-2003, 02:06 PM -
Cable Crossover Stance
By Bignbuff in forum ExercisesReplies: 2Last Post: 12-26-2002, 09:49 AM -
Technique for Cable Crossover
By Gin in forum ExercisesReplies: 0Last Post: 05-25-2002, 10:41 AM -
Cable crossover
By dawiz66 in forum ExercisesReplies: 0Last Post: 02-27-2002, 02:38 PM
Bookmarks