|
-
03-30-2011, 12:25 PM #31
-
03-30-2011, 04:29 PM #32
-
-
03-30-2011, 04:54 PM #33
But how much does he front squat, deadlift and overhead press? He is a former powerlifter, of course he will be strong IN A FREAKING PARALLEL SQUAT! But he might suck at those 3 movements I listed in the beginning. The money exercises and movements. He should post a solid 200 kg front squat, no shakes but rigid fast lifting, 270-280 deadlift and 130-135 overhead press. Those would have some relevance to weightlifting.
-
03-30-2011, 04:55 PM #34
-
03-30-2011, 04:58 PM #35
-
03-30-2011, 05:14 PM #36
-
-
03-30-2011, 05:24 PM #37
-
03-30-2011, 07:13 PM #38
-
03-30-2011, 07:54 PM #39
-
03-30-2011, 07:57 PM #40
-
-
03-30-2011, 10:24 PM #41
caleb is strong, but thats hardly what i meant by 250-260 backsquat, those were legit squats by caleb, but not really done in olympic fashion? (i could be wrong)
*edit: also i dont get why its 'pwned', im not flaming US oly lifters, just discussing. we actually do ok considering how americans only know about bodybuilding and powerlifting.
-
03-30-2011, 10:42 PM #42
If Caleb Williams does not win anything in weightlifting then lets remember this is because he is former powerlifter and there is no carryover to weightlifting whatsoever. If it is necessary to demonstrate how well US weightlifters squat then lets forget that he is former powerlifter.
My log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=130442723
-
03-31-2011, 01:02 PM #43
Bear in mind that is an old video. I have no doubt he could the same weight and reps with a little more depth. Besides not all weightlifters hit a true rock bottom in their squats. Dimas and Aranda come to mind.
Matt Bruce is another example. As a 77 he was repping 250. I don't know what he is doing now as an 85. I have nothing against the goal of big squats. It is required for weightlifting. It's just the narrow minded view of people without much of a clue that don't understand that there are many pieces to the puzzle that bother me.
All that to say, no the article DOES NOT have a point. Sure squat strength is generally what keeps intermediate lifters from making the National level, but it isn't the reason we haven't won medals at Worlds/Olympics."However, the strength of the hamstring muscles is crucial to fully exploit the strength potential of the quads and ultimately the vertical force that the athlete is able to impart to the barbell." - Andrew Charniga, Jr.
-
03-31-2011, 06:44 PM #44
I agree with this somewhat. I agree that squatting strength is what keeps local level lifters (and maybe even some master lifters - ME) from making it to the National level, however there are some (not all by any means) National level lifters that don't squat nearly enought to crack the top levels at the Worlds/Olympics. However, I also think that technique (or should I say technique at HEAVY weights) is what is keeping us from medalling. Just MHO, of course.
Training log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=168969133
Similar Threads
-
Why is it "nearly impossible" to lose fat and gain muscle at the same time?
By funkysmurf in forum Losing FatReplies: 2Last Post: 04-06-2003, 03:16 PM -
WTF!!! New BB.com "Intensity Article"...
By Luke530 in forum Workout ProgramsReplies: 6Last Post: 06-13-2002, 06:03 PM
Bookmarks