Good work... because a 400lb squat is going to help a boxer in a fight, a 500lb deadlift is gonna help a boxer, a 300 lb bench is gonna help....no they're not come on man common sense and the reason sprinters do them is to build explosive power, boxers need to be explosive for 12-15 rounds, not 10 second sprints.
|
Thread: Boxers Don't Use Weights? Why!!
-
01-16-2011, 06:45 AM #31
-
01-16-2011, 06:45 AM #32
Look at the video i posted above of dwain chambers doing low rep, heavy jump squats. All explosive athletes have a heavy weight training routine.
Fast twitch fibres are the main reason for increase in muscle size and are recruited last when put under strain, so you've got to train heavy to get them activated and built. I'm sorry but you're sorely misinformed if you think otherwise. Just because some boxers train in a certain way, doesn't mean that its the best way, sure they're good but they could have been better with heavy weight training (if that's the view you hold, that they didn't lift heavy). Saying heavy weight will slow you down is just a vague intuition when thinking about a 'bulky person'.
Even for longer distance runners, increase in muscle mass has shown to have NO negative consequences to their endurance, and improves their performance in other ways.rep back, i do it
-
-
01-16-2011, 06:46 AM #33
-
01-16-2011, 06:48 AM #34
Just because some boxers? lol
Mayweather, pacquiao, sugar ray leonard, just to name a few NEVER power lift.
And i dont know if you follow boxing but those guys are well, umm legends.
Why do you think people were amazed at pacquiao for moving UP IN WEIGHT and keeping his speed?
Because the general consensus in boxing is that when you move up in weight, you tend to forfeit speed.
I do agree with ankle weights and wrist weights for boxing. Yes because its all about explosive training.
But i think what you're referring to does NOT apply to boxers.
-
01-16-2011, 06:51 AM #35
-
01-16-2011, 06:52 AM #36
-
-
01-16-2011, 06:53 AM #37
Yes, the general consensus, which is changing and like i said because someone is successful doesn't mean they were doing it right.
Its exactly the same thing people used to think in sprinting and why 100m olympic champion Allan Wells did solely the kind of workout that you're talking about, it worked for him, but in a time when strength training hadn't been realised as effective as it was. try training like that now and see how many olympic titles you win, boxing is slow in coming around to new training science and you're relying on vague intuitions about size and speed which are not backed up by fact, as shown by your reluctance to actually deal with the points i've made backed up by the scientific understanding.rep back, i do it
-
01-16-2011, 06:56 AM #38
Yeh i guess that's why sprinter's training is largely constructed of many sets of interval sprints. I accept its not exactly the same but a boxer isn't constantly working at the same rate throughout his round, their are peaks and troughs, which is exactly how sprinters train, and then there is a short break.
Yes boxers need more endurance than a sprinter, but the arguments regarding solely the fact that lifting weights slows you down is completely erroneous. You just brought in a completely different argument, not relating to the intuition i was trying to challenge in the original post.rep back, i do it
-
01-16-2011, 06:57 AM #39
-
01-16-2011, 06:57 AM #40
- Join Date: Dec 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 10,395
- Rep Power: 3273
boxing has alot to do with speed and reflexes, you either got it or you dont.
Very little people have hidden talent for boxing and even a smaller percentage of them even box."Funny story about azn, back in d2 i thought it was a clan. so when anyone had the name AZN or would say i'm azn i was like damn that clan is huge they have members everywhere" -spens
-
-
01-16-2011, 06:57 AM #41
If someone is successful, why would they change whats working for them?? lol
Its exactly the same thing people used to think in sprinting and why 100m olympic champion Allan Wells did solely the kind of workout that you're talking about, it worked for him, but in a time when strength training hadn't been realised as effective as it was. try training like that now and see how many olympic titles you win, boxing is slow in coming around to new training science and you're relying on vague intuitions about size and speed which are not backed up by fact, as shown by your reluctance to actually deal with the points i've made backed up by the scientific understanding.
You keep bringing up sprinters. I am not doubting the "facts" you've explained but like i said, its different in boxing. Thats why 90% of them DONT power lift.
If they dont power lift, doesnt mean they arent doing it right. Its because it shouldnt be part of the training regimen. lol
Not backed up by fact. I just listed 3 of the fastest boxers in boxing HISTORY that never power lifted and you're saying they are doing it wrong.
LOL
-
01-16-2011, 06:58 AM #42
-
01-16-2011, 07:00 AM #43
FUUU i'm NOT saying they're doing it wrong! You're argument seems to be that if someone is successful at something, in a time when everyone trains the same way as them, then that must be the best way to train. It excludes the idea that people can made advances, so you're saying that succesful football players from 100 years ago could compete with those today, or would they benefit from today's training regimens? They'd obviously benefit.
rep back, i do it
-
01-16-2011, 07:03 AM #44
-
-
01-16-2011, 07:03 AM #45
Lol stop argueing with me, I'm not saying that weight training can't be placed in a boxing routine, will it have benefits? sure, but in return for lifting heavy your gonna get slower recovery and thats gonna effect the boxers training, also boxers work their body's so hard that they could easily injure themselves lifting heavy weights and an injury to a shoulder for a boxer would be tragic to their training.
It's not that it can't be dosnt or hasn't been done it's simply that the disadvantages far outweight the benefits.
-
01-16-2011, 07:03 AM #46
-
01-16-2011, 07:05 AM #47
I'm arguing a basic point but seriously you've changed your tune about 3 times already when i've tried to address your points. So now you do accept weight training doesn't slow them down per se in the ring and it could be used as a useful part of a boxer's training - so you agree with my original point, cool.
The other points you raise in this post are obviously something that any athlete has to think about, but it doesn't stop the coach coming up with a decent training system.rep back, i do it
-
01-16-2011, 07:06 AM #48
- Join Date: Nov 2010
- Location: Belfast, Ireland
- Age: 34
- Posts: 776
- Rep Power: 223
Truth
But boxers train for endurance, not just explosiveness. Hence why guys like David Haye used to get gassed in the 4th round because he focused too much on power and strength and not on endurance
Truth
I've seen guys who are in great shape, low body fat, but still barely have abs and don't look like athletes."You was better off you'd stayed in the Bronx!"
"It would've have been better for you too"
-
-
01-16-2011, 07:07 AM #49
- Join Date: Nov 2010
- Location: Belfast, Ireland
- Age: 34
- Posts: 776
- Rep Power: 223
Weight training can and is used as a useful tool by a lot of fighters
However, on the whole, the sport of boxing is very backwards and dogmatic in its approach to training techniques. Hence why lots of fighters have their training all wrong. Eg amateur fighters whose trainers have them running 5 miles every morning, but never doing sprints, even though they're training for a 3 x 2"You was better off you'd stayed in the Bronx!"
"It would've have been better for you too"
-
01-16-2011, 07:09 AM #50
I never said it was the best way to train.
I listed 3 fast boxers, who didnt power train. I can name a lot more that arent as successful as those 3 guys but are still fast as phuck with outstanding careers.
All im saying is that most boxers dont power lift for a reason. And thats why i listed those 3 guys.
Thats proven evidence that you DONT HAVE TO power lift to be fast.
Thats all i was saying.
-
01-16-2011, 07:10 AM #51
-
01-16-2011, 07:11 AM #52
-
-
01-16-2011, 07:12 AM #53
You said in response to someone saying lifting weights builds slow twitch fibres:
"Exactly this.
Most boxers do plyo's and variations.
Its all about the fast twitch muscle fibers. "
So no, that wasn't all you were saying.
And I never was arguing that you had to powerlift to be fast, exactly as my Allan Wells example demonstrated.rep back, i do it
-
01-16-2011, 07:12 AM #54
-
01-16-2011, 07:13 AM #55
-
01-16-2011, 07:14 AM #56
-
-
01-16-2011, 07:15 AM #57
-
01-16-2011, 07:16 AM #58
-
01-16-2011, 07:19 AM #59
wtf, you saying "most" doesn't make any difference to you claiming that someone was "exactly right" when saying lifting weight decreases speed and that non-weight training exercises built fast twitch fibres the best. I seriously can't believe you're still trying to claim otherwise and backpeddling on your original bul****
rep back, i do it
-
01-16-2011, 07:20 AM #60
I am an amateur boxer at the kronk and I definitely lift weights. I've done bodybuilding and boxing for years. Normally I would be glad to explain to you the logic behind weightlifting as a boxer but I've already wrote long and elaborate explanations in the past with no replies so I'm not even going to waste my time anymore.
Similar Threads
-
do you use weights with Abs? and Why?
By chicharrra in forum ExercisesReplies: 1Last Post: 07-26-2008, 02:20 PM -
Anyone know why doctors don't use this forum?
By bicyclobutane in forum Losing FatReplies: 13Last Post: 04-12-2006, 05:04 AM -
How effective is cutting when you only use weights and don't use cardio?
By norishinghgh in forum Sports TrainingReplies: 1Last Post: 05-19-2005, 03:14 AM
Bookmarks