Reply
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    MARZIA PRINCES NIPPLES Eyayo's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Posts: 2,771
    Rep Power: 733
    Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    Eyayo is offline

    any 1 fail a drug test from takin 1,3-Dimethylamylamine?

    well my boy is takin a certain popular fat burner and come up positive for amphetamines. I know for a fact hes not taking any drugs. Any input is appreciated.
    "The remembrance of the righteous one is due for a blessing, but the very name of the wicked ones will rot." (Proverbs 10:7)

    Maximize Intense..... Some serious stuff....
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User jon326's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Location: Monrovia, California, United States
    Age: 39
    Posts: 340
    Rep Power: 398
    jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    jon326 is offline
    Originally Posted by Eyayo View Post
    well my boy is takin a certain popular fat burner and come up positive for amphetamines. I know for a fact hes not taking any drugs. Any input is appreciated.
    this has been a pretty big topic, not for specific products (although products such as jack3d, oep, and other surface a lot due to popularity), and so far it seems it's a big negative that 1,3-Dimethylamylamine is causing a false readings, unless you're being tested as an athlete, but otherwise every post, article, or reponse from someone who uses something that contains this that has actually done a drug test hasnt failed.

    also, when you do a drug test, they specifically ask you if you are taking any medication. if it turns up false, they know what 1,3-Dimethylamylamine is, and can find out what jack3d contains, then do an exact test for the specific illicit metabolites, which of course would come up false.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered Bro triplewhammy's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2003
    Location: Illinois, United States
    Posts: 10,075
    Rep Power: 13519
    triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) triplewhammy is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    triplewhammy is offline
    Originally Posted by jon326 View Post
    this has been a pretty big topic, not for specific products (although products such as jack3d, oep, and other surface a lot due to popularity), and so far it seems it's a big negative that 1,3-Dimethylamylamine is causing a false readings, unless you're being tested as an athlete, but otherwise every post, article, or reponse from someone who uses something that contains this that has actually done a drug test hasnt failed.

    also, when you do a drug test, they specifically ask you if you are taking any medication. if it turns up false, they know what 1,3-Dimethylamylamine is, and can find out what jack3d contains, then do an exact test for the specific illicit metabolites, which of course would come up false.
    Nothing more to add.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User jon326's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Location: Monrovia, California, United States
    Age: 39
    Posts: 340
    Rep Power: 398
    jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50) jon326 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    jon326 is offline
    Originally Posted by triplewhammy View Post
    Nothing more to add.
    although if they wanted to they could send me a few tubs of jack3d and ill get drug tested to prove it!

    ;o)
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User tsheckler's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2010
    Location: Alberta, Canada
    Age: 39
    Posts: 74
    Rep Power: 175
    tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0) tsheckler has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    tsheckler is offline
    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/suppl...k3d-1-3-a.html

    Three guys claiming to have passed the US Military drug test while taking Jack3d.

    Sorry, but you don't know 100% what your kid is doing. I had drug dealers' parents tell me stop hanging around their kid's because they thought I was a bad influence when I was in high school. Maybe he's having trouble staying awake at school so he snorts a bump once in awhile to wake him up.

    Usually parents that are "100% sure" of what their kids are doing will fly off the handle whenever they find out their kids aren't perfect. I grew up in a home where I could discuss any drugs that I wanted with my mom and I still hid things from her on occassion.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    wat dat means, kuwait? Hardnutcheck's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Location: Florida, United States
    Posts: 7,598
    Rep Power: 7481
    Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000) Hardnutcheck is a name known to all. (+5000)
    Hardnutcheck is offline
    Passed my drug tests but became addicted to meth because of 1,3-Dime
    live laugh love <3

    BFBC2: MISC Hardnutcheck

    *** Misc Cigar Crew ***
    ***Misc EMT/Firefighter Crew***
    Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    next level bro chasinSKURT's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: Rochester, New York, United States
    Age: 37
    Posts: 8,410
    Rep Power: 18850
    chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) chasinSKURT is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    chasinSKURT is offline
    1,3 dimeth will not, and cannot cause a false positive. The supplement is contaminated, or your 'boy' is full of it.

    I've read that ephedra can cross react, but with minimal evidence to support the claim.
    Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    MARZIA PRINCES NIPPLES Eyayo's Avatar
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Posts: 2,771
    Rep Power: 733
    Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500) Eyayo is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    Eyayo is offline
    Thanx for all the responses. Hes def not lying to me because now hes ****ed and has to stay in rehab. The thing is he started this fat burner in march and failed the test from then. Got re tested and still failed, and still on the fat burner.
    "The remembrance of the righteous one is due for a blessing, but the very name of the wicked ones will rot." (Proverbs 10:7)

    Maximize Intense..... Some serious stuff....
    Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Starting Weight: 136 lbs Panabol's Avatar
    Join Date: Sep 2009
    Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Age: 30
    Posts: 3,239
    Rep Power: 2745
    Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) Panabol is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    Panabol is offline
    Originally Posted by Eyayo View Post
    Thanx for all the responses. Hes def not lying to me because now hes ****ed and has to stay in rehab. The thing is he started this fat burner in march and failed the test from then. Got re tested and still failed, and still on the fat burner.
    Well get off it and see if he passes. If not, you know there is something else going on...
    Rep Back 2k+ only
    Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Registered User Royzer's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: Tallahassee, Florida, United States
    Age: 65
    Posts: 37
    Rep Power: 0
    Royzer has no reputation, good or bad yet. (0)
    Royzer is offline
    Abstract:
    The Department of Defense (DoD) operates six forensic urine drug-testing laboratories that screen close to 5 million urine samples for amphetamines yearly. Recently, the DoD laboratories have observed a significant decrease in the confirmation rates for amphetamines because of specimens screening positive by two separate immunoassays and confirming negative by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Previous studies conducted by the Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Force Institute of Pathology (AFIP) utilizing a GC-MS basic drug screen and a designer drug screen revealed no common compound or compound classes as to the cause of the immunoassay-positive results. Additional information obtained from an immunoassay vendor suggested the anorectic compound dimethylamylamine (DMAA) may be the cause of the false-positive screens. An additional 134 false-positive samples were received and analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) for DMAA. LC-MS-MS analysis revealed the presence of DMAA in 92.3% of the false-positive samples at a concentration of approximately 6.0 mg/L DMAA, causing a positive screen on both immunoassay kits.

    Document Type: Research article

    Affiliations: 1: Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1413 Research Boulevard, Building 102, Rockville, Maryland 20850;, Email: shawn.vorce@us.army.mil 2: Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1413 Research Boulevard, Building 102, Rockville, Maryland 20850

    Publication date: 2011-04-01

    Search "1,3 dimethylamylamine drug test amphetamine" using Google Scholar
    Reply With Quote

  11. #11
    Registered User theguitarman128's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2010
    Posts: 348
    Rep Power: 459
    theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250) theguitarman128 has a spectacular aura about. (+250)
    theguitarman128 is offline
    Originally Posted by Royzer View Post
    Abstract:
    The Department of Defense (DoD) operates six forensic urine drug-testing laboratories that screen close to 5 million urine samples for amphetamines yearly. Recently, the DoD laboratories have observed a significant decrease in the confirmation rates for amphetamines because of specimens screening positive by two separate immunoassays and confirming negative by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Previous studies conducted by the Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Force Institute of Pathology (AFIP) utilizing a GC-MS basic drug screen and a designer drug screen revealed no common compound or compound classes as to the cause of the immunoassay-positive results. Additional information obtained from an immunoassay vendor suggested the anorectic compound dimethylamylamine (DMAA) may be the cause of the false-positive screens. An additional 134 false-positive samples were received and analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) for DMAA. LC-MS-MS analysis revealed the presence of DMAA in 92.3% of the false-positive samples at a concentration of approximately 6.0 mg/L DMAA, causing a positive screen on both immunoassay kits.

    Document Type: Research article

    Affiliations: 1: Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1413 Research Boulevard, Building 102, Rockville, Maryland 20850;, Email: shawn.vorce@us.army.mil 2: Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1413 Research Boulevard, Building 102, Rockville, Maryland 20850

    Publication date: 2011-04-01

    Search "1,3 dimethylamylamine drug test amphetamine" using Google Scholar
    Nice job with the data man.

    Maybe all you nay sayers should educate a little before giving advice to a guy about his kid taking amphetamines. Seriously.
    "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good." (Romans 12:21 ESV)
    Reply With Quote

  12. #12
    Registered User rbjax's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2012
    Location: United States
    Age: 36
    Posts: 49
    Rep Power: 0
    rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10) rbjax is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    rbjax is offline
    Originally Posted by Royzer View Post
    Abstract:
    The Department of Defense (DoD) operates six forensic urine drug-testing laboratories that screen close to 5 million urine samples for amphetamines yearly. Recently, the DoD laboratories have observed a significant decrease in the confirmation rates for amphetamines because of specimens screening positive by two separate immunoassays and confirming negative by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Previous studies conducted by the Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Force Institute of Pathology (AFIP) utilizing a GC-MS basic drug screen and a designer drug screen revealed no common compound or compound classes as to the cause of the immunoassay-positive results. Additional information obtained from an immunoassay vendor suggested the anorectic compound dimethylamylamine (DMAA) may be the cause of the false-positive screens. An additional 134 false-positive samples were received and analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) for DMAA. LC-MS-MS analysis revealed the presence of DMAA in 92.3% of the false-positive samples at a concentration of approximately 6.0 mg/L DMAA, causing a positive screen on both immunoassay kits.

    Document Type: Research article

    Affiliations: 1: Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1413 Research Boulevard, Building 102, Rockville, Maryland 20850;, Email: shawn.vorce@us.army.mil 2: Division of Forensic Toxicology, Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1413 Research Boulevard, Building 102, Rockville, Maryland 20850

    Publication date: 2011-04-01

    Search "1,3 dimethylamylamine drug test amphetamine" using Google Scholar
    Can someone break this down. What I see here is that the DOD was getting false positives, then changed the way they were doing the tests, now they are testing negative. Is that correct? I just posted a list of supplements that the Navy is recommending should no longer be taken in a different forum. Many of them have 1,3 D in them. I have a security clearance that I cannot lose. DOD is probably doing our drug tests so would that mean they are using the correct test method that would not produce a false positive? Any insight would be nice.
    Reply With Quote

  13. #13
    Registered User arblargan's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Posts: 75
    Rep Power: 273
    arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50) arblargan will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    arblargan is offline
    A cheap drug test will sometimes cause 1,3 to show up positive for amphetamine's. However, the cheap drug tests will not be able to differentiate between a false positive and the real thing. If a false positive occurs on a cheap drug test, further analysis from a more sensitive machine is required to show exactly what substance triggered the positive result (such as a GC/MS).

    Military drug tests go through two different stages, a cheap preliminary test first. If the cheap test comes up negative for everything, then that's as far as the sample goes and everything is good to go. However, if it comes up positive, if will go to a GC/MS to see exactly what substance caused the positive. If it is a substance that is banned, then the member will get charged for using drugs, but if it's something like Jack3D, then the person will be fine and never hear about the test coming up positive to begin with.
    A big thank you to Poison and the folks over at SAN for hooking me up with a tub of Fierce. Great customer service!
    Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. Will SUS 500 make you fail a drug test?
    By tribute_08 in forum Teen Bodybuilding
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-13-2008, 03:47 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-31-2007, 01:30 PM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-12-2005, 03:03 PM
  4. Will Superdrol make me fail a drug test.
    By pop in forum Supplements
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-21-2005, 05:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts