Do you find it odd that polygamy is illegal, but gay marriage is getting accepted?

[TheClips]

No hate, but I'm definitely confused by this.

I personally think it's more in-line with nature's laws for a man to marry multiple women (or vice versa) than it is for a dude to marry a dude.

So what the hell is going on?

Who else thinks that's kinda............irrational?

[nitr0x2]

Any marriage between consenting adults should be legal

two adult guys should be legal

one adult man and 2+ adult women should be legal

etc


Marriage with a child should stay illegal - children cannot consent
bestiality should stay illegal - animals cannot consent
necrophilia should stay illegal - the dead cannot consent

[TheJaker]

I think it's odd how law got intertwined with marriage, which is nothing but a religious sacrament.

[maden07]

bestiality should stay illegal - animals cannot consent
necrophilia should stay illegal - the dead cannot consent

lulz, is that really the reason its wrong?



























































































brb training animals to consent.

[Kiefer 2004]

The government shouldn't even recognize marriage. People should just do whatever the f*ck they want. The government needs to stay out of our love life's.

[BetterBehaved]

The government shouldn't even recognize marriage. People should just do whatever the f*ck they want. The government needs to stay out of our love life's.

this

[DaCougarMech]

if there were enough proponents for polygamy, then maybe it'd get some attention

but the fact is you gotta take one fight at a time

[Biblical_Death]

Any marriage between consenting adults should be legal

two adult guys should be legal

one adult man and 2+ adult women should be legal

etc


Marriage with a child should stay illegal - children cannot consent
bestiality should stay illegal - animals cannot consent
necrophilia should stay illegal - the dead cannot consent

overkill....

[nitr0x2]

lulz, is that really the reason its wrong


brb training animals to consent.

If animals could talk and reason with us, I don't think bestiality would be wrong. I personally think it would be gross, but should not be illegal if both the human and the animal consented to it.

Person: Hey dog, wanna have sex?
Dog: Ya, that sounds good
Person: Cool

[Doubletree]

The exact same argument for gay marriage could be made for incestual marriage.

Marriage = one man, one woman. Keep it that way. Allowing people's fukked up lifestyles to be called marriage only cheapens the institution of marriage.

[Photostic]

What about incestuous marriage? Should that be legal too?

[pedobearu_aware]

Any marriage between consenting adults should be legal

two adult guys should be legal

one adult man and 2+ adult women should be legal

etc


Marriage with a child should stay illegal - children cannot consent
bestiality should stay illegal - animals cannot consent
necrophilia should stay illegal - the dead cannot consent

This.

[DaCougarMech]

The exact same argument for gay marriage could be made for incestual marriage.

Marriage = one man, one woman. Keep it that way. Allowing people's fukked up lifestyles to be called marriage only cheapens the institution of marriage.

o rly?

[tensortrucks00]

Why do married people get incentives? **** that man.

if you want to get married go to a church and get it made official through them.

[nitr0x2]

What about incestuous marriage? Should that be legal too?

I think the scientific issues need to be considered in terms of birth defects. I don't know how common a birth defect is through incestuous reproduction, but if it is a significant percentage, then I think it should be illegal. If there was no added probability of a birth defect, then it should absolutely be legal as long as both parties are consenting adults.

[CScheiner]

Extremely controversial topic OP.

To one his own. I believe the term marriage should actually be stripped. It has such a profiling and biased message to it that it in itself can only cause problems. I believe in gay, monogomous, and polygamous partnership, but under the terms that it is legitimate in its emotions.

Edit: I am glad nitr0x2 is providing his input without biasedness and intelligent, supporting arguements. gjdm, an actual constructive miscer.

[Doubletree]

o rly?

People in Vegas make stupid decisions when drunk. Who cares?

Still better than having two disgusting homosexuals/lesbians be considered married, which forces everyone else to view their relationship as legitimate. Which it isn't, it's a fukked up mental disorder.

[anonymous]

i agree with whoever said governements should not recognize marriage, it is the dumbest contractual agreement out there

[LoKx]

necrophilia should stay illegal - the dead cannot consent

thats illegal?

[Kiefer 2004]

Still better than having two disgusting homosexuals/lesbians be considered married, which forces everyone else to view their relationship as legitimate. Which it isn't, it's a fukked up mental disorder.

Why do you care if two people of the same sex love each other?

[nitr0x2]

thats illegal?

I'd imagine, lulz

[DaCougarMech]

People in Vegas make stupid decisions when drunk. Who cares?

Still better than having two disgusting homosexuals/lesbians be considered married, which forces everyone else to view their relationship as legitimate. Which it isn't, it's a fukked up mental disorder.

i think britney spears qualifies as having a "fukked up mental disorder". she got a legally recognized marriage like it was candy

for some reason i dont see a lot of people complaining about how it "forces everyone else to view their relationship as legitimate"

strong hypocrite

[Doubletree]

Why do you care if two people of the same sex love each other?

I care that they try to pawn off their shallow perverted relationship as equal to the bond between a man and a woman.

Do some research you typical left-wing emotional ass pussy. Homosexual relationships last only three years on average and are rarely monogamous.

You may consider yourself equal to a couple of butt plugging homos, but myself and the majority of people in this country do not and cannot be forced to.

[Biblical_Death]

If animals could talk and reason with us, I don't think bestiality would be wrong. I personally think it would be gross, but should not be illegal if both the human and the animal consented to it.

Person: Hey dog, wanna have sex?
Dog: Ya, that sounds good
Person: Cool

and people are calling me a creep? the fuk

[pleaserepme]

The exact same argument for gay marriage could be made for incestual marriage.

Marriage = one man, one woman. Keep it that way. Allowing people's fukked up lifestyles to be called marriage only cheapens the institution of marriage.

50% divorce rates.

Yeah, what a sacred institution. stfu

[nitr0x2]

I care that they try to pawn off their shallow perverted relationship as equal to the bond between a man and a woman.

Do some research you typical left-wing emotional ass pussy. Homosexual relationships last only three years on average and are rarely monogamous.

It doesn't have to be called a 'marriage' as long as there is some kind of legal precedent in place.

It sucks that a gay soldier fighting in the army and gets killed in action can't list his partner as next of kin to be notified of his death.

[Biblical_Death]

People in Vegas make stupid decisions when drunk. Who cares?

Still better than having two disgusting homosexuals/lesbians be considered married, which forces everyone else to view their relationship as legitimate. Which it isn't, it's a fukked up mental disorder.

I tried, but your still red

[nitr0x2]

and people are calling me a creep? the fuk

Read again stupid fuk. I said I personally think it would be gross, but should not be illegal. If a man and a dog both wanted to have sex with each other and both consented, why the fuk not?

note: this is provided the scenario in which dogs could talk and reason with humans

[Abitofmuscle]

I think the scientific issues need to be considered in terms of birth defects. I don't know how common a birth defect is through incestuous reproduction, but if it is a significant percentage, then I think it should be illegal. If there was no added probability of a birth defect, then it should absolutely be legal as long as both parties are consenting adults.

Just playing devil's advocate here.

What you're saying is that people shouldn't be allowed to have children if there is a chance that the child can grow up with something like a birth defect (reduced intelligence/smaller/weaker etc)

Then what about now allowing stupid people/fat people etc to have children? Certainly don't want to pass those traits onto children either.

It's a slippery slope.

The government has decided what they think is best for us basically. Except what is best for us usually (always) seems to change into what is best for them.

[whosane]

Meh I am not surprised. It's more of a cultural thing. Other cultures don't have polygamy as taboo while some other culture don't worry about homosexuality. Geographical location FTW!