Due to the amount of bitchery of tyson vs mma, I just thought I'd input what happened to me, a few weeks ago. My cousin is always getting into trouble, hes 19, he doesn't neccessarily cause it, but he gets in it.
He was walking the dog down the beach when, a guy 2 years above him from school ( had trouble with before ) who is now a semi pro boxer started upon him. Cousin didnt know what to do, got put in hospital went to A&E was really concussed.
I drove down to the beach and seen him running up the steps, the thing is, he knows I'm his cousin, he advanced towards me (hes really tall, and built) now my striking isnt amazing so he hit me with a big right hook to the temple.. It did rock me, but then I realised I was in a fight, I went straight in for the double leg, it was just natural instinct, I wasnt thinking I just did it, he was then hoysted 5 foot in the air and slammed on the pavement..
People pulled there cars up telling me to get off him, where as he started the whole thing. He immediately... as soon as he got his breath back from being winded from the slam, he immediately gave his back up to try and turn away and get back to his feet.
I ofcourse locked the choke on.. til he was gargling for air. Then I let go, police showed up, I got arrested, yes, me.. Bystanders said I started it.
|
-
03-23-2009, 08:34 PM #1
The streetfight, overdrawn but meh.
-
03-23-2009, 08:45 PM #2
-
03-23-2009, 08:50 PM #3
You beat up some punk kid that is a semi pro boxer... a little different than a pro boxer with a hard punch like Tyson. You said yourself that the kid connected with a good shot to your temple. If Tyson connects with a hard shot to most people's temple (pro fighters included) they are going out. Congrats on sticking up for your cousin (if story is true) but I still think Tyson simply needs to land a single punch to end any fight he is in.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.
Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
-
03-23-2009, 09:03 PM #4
-
-
03-23-2009, 09:05 PM #5
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Posts: 41,221
- Rep Power: 23268
"The sun is always gonna rise, and always gonna set and I'll just keep on punching because everyday is gonna bring something different and I just want to be ready for it."
- Jens Pulver
If you refer to a fighter who you've never met in real life as "my boy" as though their performance somehow reflects well on you for simply being a fan, you're a lame ass.
-
03-23-2009, 09:06 PM #6
-
03-23-2009, 09:18 PM #7
-
03-23-2009, 09:34 PM #8
-
-
03-23-2009, 09:37 PM #9
Everyone does know that Royce Gracie did get punched every once in a while right? He did not just magically take the guy down without being hit at all. I understand this is an MMA forum and everyone is going to subjectively defend the MMA position, but grapplers usually take a couple of punches before getting the takedown. I won't argue against the fact that if a grappler can take the boxer down the fight will be over quickly, but if the grappler takes one decent punch the fight will also be over quickly... in the end it is a fight and anything can happen though I guess.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.
Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
-
03-23-2009, 09:38 PM #10
-
03-23-2009, 09:40 PM #11
-
03-23-2009, 09:43 PM #12
-
-
03-23-2009, 09:45 PM #13
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Indiana, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 10,469
- Rep Power: 11144
Ok, but he still won the fight despite getting hit with a crisp shot.
And the fact that Royce got hit on his way in---and DIDN'T get KO'ed---only adds support to the position that a grappler will clinch and take a striker down, with negligible chance of getting KO'ed.
In before, "but Royce never fought Tyson (and other Tyson cocksucking that makes him seem inhuman)". The point is, trained strikers--who were good enough to go pro in boxing or kickboxing--had no clue how to stop a takedown, and did not KO a grappler going for a takedown.
-
03-23-2009, 09:47 PM #14
I would venture to guess that Mike Tyson (thats who we are talking about here, not some slouch "pro" boxer) would be able to connect at least once. I guess we are arguing apples and oranges though... I think that most MMA fans ( I am a fan too) just do not give the proper respect to the danger a great boxer could pose. I think only the elite boxers would be able to do anything in MMA. Middle of the road boxers would absolutely get destroyed.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.
Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
-
03-23-2009, 09:48 PM #15
-
03-23-2009, 09:48 PM #16
you know what the problem is
whenever they have like mma vs boxer interviews it seems like boxers talk **** and say they are better, then mma guy will say the same thing and actually challenge the boxing world...then boxer doesnt follow up with challenge
hell chuck liddel even mentioned once that he had a 135lber that would be willing to fight a 150 boxer
-
-
03-23-2009, 09:49 PM #17
It's easy for you to say "In before...." against a very valid argument. The early MMA guys may have been good enough to go into pro boxing, but none of them would have amounted to anything. I'd bet that there are maybe, and that is an enormous maybe, 1 or 2 guys who have punching power comparable to that which Tyson had.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.
Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
-
03-23-2009, 09:51 PM #18
-
03-23-2009, 09:51 PM #19
-
03-23-2009, 09:54 PM #20
Not really familiar with either of those two fighters so I can't really speak on the subject. Also don't know how old they were when they fought or anything. I mean Mercer fought in MMA and did not have good luck either, but I know he was over the hill. I'd like to defend against your argument, but I honestly am not very familiar with either of their careers.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.
Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
-
-
03-23-2009, 09:56 PM #21
-
03-23-2009, 09:59 PM #22
-
03-23-2009, 10:04 PM #23
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Indiana, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 10,469
- Rep Power: 11144
True. But you take an average boxer vs. an average MMA fighter and the MMA fighter wins. Take an elite Tyson and place him against a similarly-sized elite level grappler and he's toast.
But if an MMA fighter would feel outmatched in a boxing ring, but a boxer would feel outmatched in a fight that allows pretty much everything, then what does that tell you about who will most likely win in a fight where EVERYTHING is allowed?
I mean, it's common sense. Does the boxer have a chance? Yes. But is it a good one? NO.
-
03-23-2009, 10:09 PM #24
-
-
03-23-2009, 10:11 PM #25
I don't know about the elite Tyson statement though. Because even the elite grappler that Royce was he still got hit by above average strikers. In Tyson's case I really think that it would be lights out. Even with Nog's amazing ability to take a hit and recover, I think Tyson himself would hit too hard. I really think that almost all boxers (including most elite ones) would fair very poorly in MMA, but because of Tyson's size (he is relatively short for the division he would be in) I think his low center of mass would make him difficult to take down compared to most other boxers. I am not arguing boxer vs MMA quite as much as it is Tyson vs MMA. I can not think of many boxers that would fair well at all in MMA though. Certainly nobody boxing today comes to mind.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.
Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
-
03-23-2009, 10:14 PM #26
If mma fighters did not think they could be a boxer in a boxing match why would guys like Silva and Sylvia consider participating in boxing than? It is kind of implied that they think they will win. I don't knock them, or the boxer for having confidence in themselves.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.
Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
-
03-23-2009, 10:15 PM #27
-
03-23-2009, 10:15 PM #28
-
-
03-23-2009, 10:25 PM #29
-
03-23-2009, 10:27 PM #30
This is a good comparison for Striker vs Grappler, but it's not the same as Tyson vs Gracie where Gracie is obviously a grappler that is above your average run of the mil fighter and Tyson is a 1 in a million boxer... I mean on the flip side I've seen HS wrestlers get knocked out by kids who have never took fighting in their lives....when talking about Tyson vs Gracie I don't see how mentioning such low level forms of their arts would really be of any benefit.
well some world champion boxers and top ten boxers have gone in mma and never landed a punch when they were matched up with good grapplers at the time. art jimmerson and james warring vs gracies are two that come to mind.Last edited by Mrs Grudge; 03-23-2009 at 10:32 PM.
Access the gun's off the earth axis
Axis of evil, the eagle will leave your hat split
Ruck flow is like "**** you, Gawd"
I don't wanna rhyme, I need a construction job
- Sean Price
Bookmarks