|
-
02-02-2009, 12:31 PM #91
-
02-02-2009, 12:32 PM #92
i agree, knew a guy who went to Juvy...and everyone (adults) were telling him how well behaved and better he was afterwards..he told us that being in there just made him smarter and sneakier...
and to what exguitar player said...i belive the smaller guys with "something to prove" are more dangerous then the huge bodybuilders..but id rather fight someone smaller than me then a 250+lbs bodybuilder in prison..lol
-
-
02-02-2009, 12:34 PM #93
-
02-02-2009, 12:54 PM #94
-
02-02-2009, 01:35 PM #95
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 6,196
- Rep Power: 14834
certainly there must be a statistic somewhere regarding recidivism of ex-cons who came from facilities that had decent fitness facilities and those that did not?
we've been through this, ad nauseum.....i was locked up in two different states, as well as the fed....there was no fitness equipment anywhere i've been. no library, no gym. nothing to do. a few decks of cards for the spades players, and that was all. THAT makes me not want to go back.
-
02-02-2009, 01:37 PM #96
-
-
02-02-2009, 01:48 PM #97
-
02-02-2009, 02:09 PM #98
-
02-02-2009, 02:11 PM #99
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 55
- Posts: 1,689
- Rep Power: 399
I think this might have been touched on previously, but I was trying to read through all the posts and might have missed it, but, I think that you are focusing more strictly on men in prison who are there for committing a physical crime against another person. In those cases I think restricting them from weightlifting might be a good idea.
In the many other cases where the convicted person is not in prison because of a crime against a person, but rather a theft or even something like hot check writing or something non-violent, then I see no reason to restrict them from weight lifting. Unless their temperment inside turns to violent and you might want to restrict weight lifting from anyone that acts that way for your previous resons.
-
02-02-2009, 02:17 PM #100
I have found quite a few studies today.. form what I'm getting so far. The prison systems that not allow weightlifting but allow this to be carried over to comps. have good things to say about it uses.. primarily because inmates that compete are afraid of losing this privliage so they stay on pretty good behavior.
Now the studies I've found aginst it all come back to drug use or the perception that Americans have about it.. mostly the idea of having to pay tax dollars for it (even though studies show this isn't where the money comes from) or the perception that were being to easy on prisoners.
-
-
02-02-2009, 02:23 PM #101
From what I'm reading nonviolent offenders, gang members, and women aren't really drawn to weightlifting in prison. In fact it's very uncommon for younger prisoners to take an interest in weightlifting atleast according to the study I'm reading.. it's the lifers and older generations that still fight for this right and want weightlifting equipment.
-
02-02-2009, 02:28 PM #102
I think MARIUS MAY BE RETARDED. Your wife at under 100 lbs. has dropped many men larger than you? Even if this was some how true why the fu ck is your wife getting into fights with men you idiot. Or is she so incredibly hot men attempt to rape her alot. No maybe she is a pro fighter in an underground fight league that enjoys watching 100 lb. woman fight 200 lb men because they are rich evil men.
Just cause your wife said size doen't matter doesn't mean its true.
-
02-02-2009, 02:39 PM #103
OK I just found this study interesting..
Annotation: The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction has sought to tailor its policies to reflect public opinion while staying true to programs it believes to be ultimately good for public protection and the positive socialization of inmates in prison and in the community after release.
Abstract: Reflecting public acceptance of community corrections for nonviolent offenders, Ohio has diverted over 31,000 offenders from State prison and into community corrections sanctions since 1991. This is an effort to divert nonviolent offenders from costly imprisonment while reserving prison space for violent offenders. On another issue occasioned by public antagonism toward perceived inmate "perks," including weightlifting, the department held its ground in support of such valuable inmate management tools. The department compromised, however, in not giving inmates in maximum-security institutions access to any bodybuilding equipment. Inmates in medium-security and minimum- security prisons have access to only fixed-weight equipment. In reaction to public opinion against using public funds to provide college degree programs for inmates while some citizens could not afford to send their children to college, the department eliminated degree programs for inmates while contracting with Ohio universities to provide "continuing education" to inmates. The program avoids the use of public grants slated for traditional students. In emphasizing vocational training programs for inmates, the depart facilitates the hiring of ex-offenders upon release. The reputation of prison programs is enhanced and society benefits from the establishment of linkages between Ohio's businesses and employable ex-offenders. The department has been proactive in revising its classification system, has developed a community service program, and has taken a number of actions to support victims' rights, including opening parole hearings to victims. 5 references
-
02-02-2009, 02:52 PM #104
-
-
02-02-2009, 02:56 PM #105
-
02-02-2009, 02:59 PM #106
-
02-02-2009, 03:02 PM #107
-
02-02-2009, 03:14 PM #108
-
-
02-02-2009, 03:21 PM #109
-
02-02-2009, 03:22 PM #110
-
02-02-2009, 03:35 PM #111
inmate management
I think that part of the "inmate management" involved with weightlifting is where the inmates require more sleep because of lifting and are also sometimes sore during the day. If inmates sleep for 8-9 hours rather than, say, 6, I'd say that makes the guards' jobs easier.
How many folks here get "squirrely" after missing 4 or 5 days from lifting? Now, imagine the difference between a prison inmate the day after leg day vs. an inmate who can't lift and is pacing around in his cell with pent-up energy, anger, and boredom. The first might be "bigger," but he's also generally more easy to manage, simply because he's tired and sleeps more.
There's also a lot of discipline and emotional control involved with proper diet, which I would think would help set inmates on the "straight and narrow." It's also something where the failures of society can start to create some sort of concept of success, which is necessary for their socialization.investigating mechanics of pulleys, levers, and mass.
-
02-02-2009, 03:53 PM #112
-
-
02-02-2009, 04:05 PM #113
-
02-02-2009, 04:44 PM #114
Well, I didn't want to get into the whole debate about rehabilitation and parole, especially concerning the non-violent criminals. Suffice it to say that the U.S. has the world's highest incarceration rate, except for perhaps China or North Korea.
It hasn't always been this way. The U.S. incarceration rate was much lower 25 or 30 years ago, when it was more comparable to imprisonment rates in Europe. 25 or 30 years ago is when the War on Drugs really got going in the U.S.
Americans tend to look at things in simplistic, all-or-nothing terms. This leads to stuff like mandatory sentencing for non-violent crimes and situations where non-violent criminals get thrown in with violent offenders and come out of jail worse than they went in.
Of course, violent criminals need to be locked up, but in some cases with the smaller non-violent offenses, we're spending billions of dollars that might better be returned to the taxpayers. This is literally the case in California where the prison system is part of what's causing that state to go broke and not give people their tax refunds. Thirty years or so ago, more rehabilitation was done, and it was effective for certain types of first-time non-violent offenders though it doesn't work with habitual hardened criminals.
But, the public was against that. Now, there's a worse rate of recidivism.
Well, it would be a lot easier to see things in simplistic terms....looks like we might have to throw that pothead Michael Phelps in jail. (/sarcasm)
For the record, I think Phelps' advertisers are justified if they want to pull endorsements and I think the IOC should investigate his behavior and substance use. What Michael Phelps did was wrong and very unbecoming of him as an athlete.
Last edited by partsRheavy; 02-02-2009 at 04:48 PM.
investigating mechanics of pulleys, levers, and mass.
-
02-02-2009, 04:45 PM #115
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Age: 66
- Posts: 1,538
- Rep Power: 1630
its like beating a dead horse as this has been repeated over and over but in georgia prisons there are no weights and no supplements to be bought. there are no tv's in the cells only a tv mounted in the middle of the dorm. stuff like the tv and the basic cable for it are bought out of inmate funds from the store not taxpayer money. very little can be bought out of the stores as there are no microwaves. mostly raemon noodle soups and crackers and such. that goes for all levels. during my 8 year stay i was in max, close security discliplinary, medium and minium. in georgia most anything that could be viewed as a perk was removed years ago. even with no weights i stayed in excellent shape by doing massive amounts of pushups and squats and whatever i could find to do bodyweight exercises.
Loved by some
Hated by others
Forgiven by the grace of God.
-
02-02-2009, 05:53 PM #116
- Join Date: Dec 2005
- Location: Bronx, New York, United States
- Age: 59
- Posts: 43,414
- Rep Power: 198265
-
-
02-02-2009, 06:19 PM #117
-
02-02-2009, 06:31 PM #118
Actually from what I read our tax dollars (in most case ) do not pay for this gym equipment. Most of it is paid by the inmates themselves.. they had to raise money for it. This is why they had to pass laws in order to get rid of the gyms in jails that wanted it banned. Had the prisons simply removed it .. then basically it would have been theft. What they did was pass a law saying that new stuff could not be brought into the jails this means the inmates keep what they have untill it breaks and the jails are permitted to throw it away.
-
02-02-2009, 06:34 PM #119
-
02-02-2009, 06:36 PM #120
Bookmarks