|
Thread: biceps mass builders?
-
12-25-2008, 03:11 PM #61
-
12-25-2008, 03:19 PM #62
-
12-25-2008, 03:19 PM #63
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Lakeland, Florida, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 55,577
- Rep Power: 179271
Then why not say compound lifts/exercises, instead of misusing systematic exercise?
For the record, I know all about the test release from doing large exercises. Did you also know that the test release from say a heavy deadlift is relatively trivial when compared to other compound exercises? yes it is a large test release, yet so is the release from doing a challenging bench press.-
Alchemist of Alcohol
-
-
-
Journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=126418493
-
12-25-2008, 03:27 PM #64
-
-
12-26-2008, 03:04 AM #65
-
12-26-2008, 04:15 AM #66
-
12-26-2008, 05:56 AM #67
-
12-26-2008, 06:19 AM #68
Its true. He's 100% right. Hypertrophy is systematic and not regional. This is why compound movements are better for mass and strength versus isolation exercises. repped.
"When The Going Gets Tough, The Tough Get Going."
True failure: "I train to failure, plus one more rep"
started 12/21/08
Incline Press: 185x2/now 215x1
CG Palms Up Pulldown: 100x7/now 150x5
CG Bent-Over Palms Up Barbell Row: 145x5/now 175x4
Leg Press: 8platesx8/now 10platesx8
Shoulder Press: 120x4/now 150x4
Weighted Dip: 25lbsx4
-
-
12-26-2008, 07:48 AM #691/3/09 bench press 1rm 300#
1/3/10 bench press 1rm 315#
I don't lift like ^^that^^ anymore...
Just lifting because I love it and trying to lead by example with my 3 elite athlete kids; Amanda on the Varsity Dance Team, Zack playing lacrosse on an elite level and starring on our 8th grade football team and fast becoming a golf prodigy and Kitty excelling at the grade school level on the track, soccer field and basketball court.
-
12-26-2008, 07:51 AM #70
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Lakeland, Florida, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 55,577
- Rep Power: 179271
-
12-26-2008, 08:12 AM #71
-
12-26-2008, 08:47 AM #72
-
-
12-26-2008, 10:25 AM #73
Dead lifting might add mass to your arms but if you do the big 3 bicep builders as I call them, and do them RIGHT you will see better gains. And I'm not talking about ME, but other, bigger, guys I knew who did this.
Straight up barbell curls, don't listen to those who slam this exercise, its key to big bis. And don't go too heavy, use a weight you can do perfect form, for 10-15 reps, yes go higher on reps for a while and then drop the reps down lower once you develop some endurance etc.
preacher curls are number two. They work period.
For number 3 I'd have to go with incline dumbbell curls, personally speaking they seem to work pretty well.
again everyones different but you can't get huge arms just doing squats and deads. You have to have direct arm work along with the compounds.
-
12-26-2008, 10:37 AM #74
-
12-26-2008, 10:40 AM #75
-
12-26-2008, 03:28 PM #76
-
-
12-26-2008, 06:23 PM #77"When The Going Gets Tough, The Tough Get Going."
True failure: "I train to failure, plus one more rep"
started 12/21/08
Incline Press: 185x2/now 215x1
CG Palms Up Pulldown: 100x7/now 150x5
CG Bent-Over Palms Up Barbell Row: 145x5/now 175x4
Leg Press: 8platesx8/now 10platesx8
Shoulder Press: 120x4/now 150x4
Weighted Dip: 25lbsx4
-
12-26-2008, 07:23 PM #78
I like ez curls, hammer curls and straight bar cable curls the best. The cable curls are nice because you get just as much tension on both the concentric and eccentric portions. Personally the only compound that will hit the biceps really well is a close grip chin up and I wouldn't rely on it soley for bicep size though lol. Honestly though in a deadlift your biceps are working statically against the weight especially if you do an alternate grip and the 1 side thats underhanded. That being said its not gonna be a great bicep builder like a curl would be lol.
-
12-26-2008, 08:09 PM #79
-
12-26-2008, 10:25 PM #80
I guess nobody mentioned this but once you get your arms reasonably developed for your current size within your own individual genetics...reality is that you'll likely need to put on another 20lbs in bodyweight to see an inch on the arms. That's going to be best done via squats, pulls, presses as well as keeping up with the curls.
As far as exercises that tend to really push up the bis. I like some kind of chin or reverse grip pull down and a good curl variant like a barbell or dumbbell curl. Pick a curl flavor of the month that feels good and work damn hard at it If you really want you can get a bit more exotic with a lighter finishing movement or something else but that tends to work for most (maybe a barbell curl and then incline dumbbell curls for a finisher).
The reality is that people quickly find that they hit a genetic limit at a certain bodyweight where their arms just aren't going to get bigger unless their whole body gets bigger. Granted, you see some guys with outrageously sized arms but these weren't the guys who had smaller arms despite heavy dedication, got frustrated and then lucked into the holy combination of exercises after posting on a forum and now have 24" arms at 5'10" and 160lbs. These are the guys whose genetics allow them to develop very large arms relative to the bodies and they typically post about making their delts or legs bigger. From your post, you most likely aren't that guy.
-
-
12-26-2008, 10:58 PM #81
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: Saint Charles, Illinois, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 150
- Rep Power: 211
Nothing will fix that gap lol, it is the way your muscle is. We are born with a certain shape in our muscles and nothing can change that shape.
For instance, if your bi has a short, high peak, you cannot lift specifically to make it long and slender.
Isolated curls are best, let the arm hang as you are bent over, elbow stays forward (not compensating with the body as i see so many doing) and curl with full extension.
Arnold style!Internal dialogue effects external performance.
-
12-27-2008, 12:55 AM #82
-
12-27-2008, 10:59 AM #83
-
12-27-2008, 11:10 AM #84
-
-
12-27-2008, 11:13 AM #85
-
12-27-2008, 11:14 AM #86
I don't agree with this, though you aren't the first person to say it.
I have never seen any kind of hard evidence regarding a "genetic" limit that can only be broken by training other parts of the body.
It is a great example of extrapolating causality from correlation.
Getting bigger arms will make you gain weight, but it does not logically follow that simply gaining weight will make your arms much bigger.
The implication is some kind of general adaptation. Your body adapts specifically to the stress imposed.
Is it true that people who train their entire body often have bigger arms than those who only train arms? I would say YES, there is a correlation. However, that doesn't mean the cause is training the rest of the body.
I think the cause is more likely that those who train their whole body are more serious about their training and stick with it longer including diet, progression and possible drug use.Last edited by Defiant1; 12-27-2008 at 11:20 AM.
CSCS, ACSM cPT.
-
12-27-2008, 11:23 AM #87
There's also the factor of more evenly distributed fat weight gain vs more adaptive lean mass weight gain.
So someone who gains 20 pounds, not entirely lean muscle, WILL gain some size in the arms, fooling people into thinking any general weight gain adds muscle overall.Last edited by Tyrbolift; 12-27-2008 at 11:25 AM.
Time To Re-Schedule
-
12-27-2008, 11:28 AM #88
-
-
12-27-2008, 11:49 AM #89
Funny how the simplest explanations are usually the best.
Yes....generally people who work their entire bodies eat more. They have to. The caloric demands are much greater. They are going to look bigger with an added % of body fat and muscle. It doesn't necessarily mean their arms are muscularly bigger than someone who trains arms specifically for size. Many times it's all illusion.
-
12-27-2008, 12:09 PM #90
Bookmarks