|
View Poll Results: Should People With Less Than 100 Post's Be Able To Post Images?
- Voters
- 298. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes - Let Trolls Spam/Make Gay Threads
80 26.85% -
No
218 73.15%
-
08-12-2008, 11:11 AM #61
-
08-23-2008, 10:46 PM #62
-
08-24-2008, 01:46 PM #63
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 2,866
- Rep Power: 14255
but you have to think about this from another perspective
there are many members who do actually join this site for bodybuilding help
a 100 post limit would discourage new legit members, and maybe keep them away from the site if for example, they wanted advice and were unable to post pics to support their problems, or if they wanted people to help them determine their bodyfat % etc===Goal achieved. Now lean bulking for life===
Format: Start (Dec-11) ---- Goal achieved (Aug-12)
Squat: 50kg x 5 ---- 170kg x 1
Bench: 50kg x 5 ---- 100kg x 1
Deadlift: 85 kg x 5 ---- 200kg x 1
Total: 185 kg / 408 lbs --- 470 kg / 1036 lbs
*CEO 10k/day crew*
*99.9th percentile IQ crew*
-
11-12-2008, 12:33 AM #64
-
-
11-13-2008, 02:49 AM #65
-
11-13-2008, 04:57 AM #66
-
11-17-2008, 08:08 PM #67
I am so freaking sick of gore porn.
Just thought I'd share that
*edit* I just finally made the decision to uncheck the box in user cp to show images. But this is still lame, I know I'm new and all, but my little girl runs around and plays in the same room as I surf in. Surely I'm not the only parent browsing bb.com.
How horrible would it be to implement a minimum post count requirement to post images?Last edited by ...Kennedy; 11-17-2008 at 08:16 PM.
-
11-30-2008, 02:18 PM #68
-
-
12-01-2008, 06:41 AM #69
Bookmarks