Well, think about it this way... You if you take in 1200 calories, think of the time to digest it. It would take two 600 calorie meals to compensate for the digestion of that 1200 calories meal. Will some be stored as fat in the 1200 calorie meal, depends if your overall deficit is met, if it's not, it will be burned throughout the say and you'll still lose weight.
|
Thread: How do you work + eat 6 times?
-
04-30-2008, 08:41 AM #31"The world will look up and shout save us... And I'll whisper, no."
Leonidas300, SCDiesel23, Jkeith are my heroes.
-
04-30-2008, 08:45 AM #32
-
-
04-30-2008, 08:47 AM #33
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 20,348
- Rep Power: 34929
how do you guys even eat 3 times a day
i am starving every 2 hoursMET-Rx/Pure Protein Board Rep
*Disclaimer: The thoughts and opinions of this rep are of his own and does not reflect MET-Rx/Pure Protein as a company. This user is a Bodybuilding.com board representative and is not an employee of MET-Rx/Pure Protein.*
Iron Mulisha Athlete
-
04-30-2008, 08:48 AM #34
-
04-30-2008, 08:51 AM #35
-
04-30-2008, 08:54 AM #36
-
-
04-30-2008, 08:59 AM #37
Nothing says you have to eat 6 times during the day. Many people here do fine on 2-3 meals a day (look up matthor...I'm pretty sure he only eats 2-3 times a day). I think it's more important that you maintain a consistent eating pattern day-to-day. The actual frequency of the meals doesn't really matter imo.
Personally, I do eat 6-7 times per day, but it's just what I prefer. I feel less hungry, less bloated after meals, and I seem to have more consistent energy during the day. I don't think it heavily affects fat loss or muscle gain though. Nutrient timing surrounding your workouts is important, but otherwise...not so much. At least not in my experience anyway.
-
04-30-2008, 09:00 AM #38
- Join Date: Mar 2006
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
- Posts: 5,218
- Rep Power: 5437
i believe layne has some research that shows it can be more beneficial to eat less frequently (like 4 times a day) with slightly bigger meals. something about protein synthesis being more active after being spiked and going up and down rather than staying relatively constant.
something i may incorporate into this coming offseason
-
04-30-2008, 09:01 AM #39
-
04-30-2008, 09:02 AM #40
-
-
04-30-2008, 09:04 AM #41
-
04-30-2008, 09:07 AM #42
-
04-30-2008, 09:33 AM #43
-
04-30-2008, 09:34 AM #44
-
-
04-30-2008, 09:36 AM #45
-
04-30-2008, 09:55 AM #46
Cool, I'm really glad I read this thread. Heck, maybe I'll eat 100-30cal meals a day
I have read that ... if you don't keep it refrigerated it will break down. But refrigerated... nothing can touch it. Just seems like common sense to me, as milk is whey (and casein) and well, you know what happens there!
alka8
-
04-30-2008, 10:35 AM #47
^^^^
Thank you Aaron.
Since Aaron brought up the fact that Layne doesn't eat 6 times a day, should I pull his height and weight up? Not to mention his contest record? No, there is no point. Tussman eats twice a day, he has a solid build. Body stats have absolutely nothing to do with meal frequency.
Calories are calories, it doesn't matter when or how you eat them.
-
04-30-2008, 10:37 AM #48
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
- Posts: 13,281
- Rep Power: 10806
Ugh - god I'm going to have to agree with Aaron!
"I personally can't eat much, maybe around 600-700 cals a meal. So I have to just eat more frequently to get the cals in." This .... right here... is by far and away the largest reason to eat lots of meals.
The you all might be scientists, but I'm a historian. The old school bodybuilders that started getting into more than '3 square meals a day' did so because it was easier for them to get in all the massive cals they needed. All this crap about digesting more and all that. Total nonsense. I mean, most of human history has seen people laboring HARD all day with a huge breakfast and a big ol' dinner. You think an Egyptian bricklayer's body, working 10 hours in the blazing sun, just decided not to metabolize more than ~500 cals from his big meals? It just doesn't make sense.
-
-
04-30-2008, 10:43 AM #49
AGREED! Thank you.
Like I've said many times, what do you think it is like for military? 3 MRE's a day while in the field. We can't stop in the middle of a training exercise and say "Excuse me, sir, but it's been 3 hours since chow, I need to eat my chicken and rice." When I was at basic, we got 3 squares a day, no pre-workout meals, no PWO shakes, no pre-bed casein, just plain ol water after PT.
-
04-30-2008, 10:46 AM #50
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: Oak Forest, Illinois, United States
- Posts: 23
- Rep Power: 0
You need to figure out what works for your schedule. I work retail loss prevention and operations. So my schedule is all over the place. I work my meals around what i do in a typical week. It takes a while to figure out what works best for you but you get it down after a few trials and errors. My days starts as early as 5 or 7.
Before i leave the house, i'll have a bannana a glas of h2o with my vitamins. (small black coffee on the way to work)
Once at work, Mini Bagel, Yogurt and an orange or an apple.
2-3 hrs later, Whole grain sandwich with turkey or peanut butter, carrots or grean beans, and soy crisps
2-3 hrs later, Half sandwich, piece of fruit and a HB Egg.
2-3 hrs later, 11oz Muscle Milk and 1 Trioplex peanut butter cookie.
Work out
2-3 Hrs later, Chicken or Fish, Steamed white rice with veggies.
Lite snack before bed.
-
04-30-2008, 11:05 AM #51
-
04-30-2008, 11:08 AM #52
-
-
04-30-2008, 11:09 AM #53
Of course it does. Eating a lot of meals is not only to keep metabolism high. It is also to provide a constant supply of
1-protein to fight catabalism and aid in anabolism
2-carbs to keeps glycogen stores high. Important for strentgh and stored egergy
3-vits and mins to help digestion and absorption
also
4-depending on your size and body, we can only absorb so many calories at a time. Any extra are stored as fat!! Even too much protein and complex carbs!!!
5-you are satisfied, not stuffed from fitting all your cals into three meals.
Your body is very adaptive, eating only a few squares a day tells your body to hold onto its nutrients because it learns that feedings are spaced more, that means less protein absorption, and your body will maintain higher cholesterol and blood sugar levels along with the storing of more fat in regard to not knowing when the next meal is going to be. However, many small meals lets your body learn to readily use those nutrients to build and maintain a positive nitrogen balance from frequent protein servings and to use those extra lipids and carbs as energy instead of storing them in planning for a drought. Anyone who can get away with 3 meals a day and still grow quality muscle mass is just blessed with great genetics. PERIOD.
-
04-30-2008, 11:14 AM #54
if I see the metabolism thing one more time I'm leaving and never coming back (boo-hoo right?)
anyway, this whole keep a constant stream of aminos, or the even dumber sounding keep feeding your muscles protein, it ****.
Say the former is what you really want, the latter as well since they are the same thing. Does everyone realize how long it takes to fully digest protein? Aminos are being released for several hours, so if you want to eat protein every 3, whatever..but you don't have to.
Next, this might not even be the best way to do it. There could be something to be said for ingesting a bolus of protein rather than keeping this constantly fed pattern.Realize that anyone with an affiliation to a supplement company in their signature has ulterior motives when making recommendations. They're primarily concerned with pushing their products. Not your safety or what's best for you.
-
04-30-2008, 11:31 AM #55
-
04-30-2008, 11:47 AM #56
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 20,348
- Rep Power: 34929
-
-
04-30-2008, 12:03 PM #57
-
04-30-2008, 12:04 PM #58
-
04-30-2008, 12:05 PM #59
-
04-30-2008, 12:50 PM #60
Bookmarks