Would women be able to survive without men???

[wincel]

You know women in the 18 century were miners?
You know in WWII women took over all the domestic male roles and that was in a time when they weren’t considered “equal”
Women have a tendency to do what needs to be done to survive and protect their young (and sperm banks and cloning are a thing)
Humans tend to rise to challenges ..like men would survive without women

Whether we’d want to is another thing

Efficiency would take a huge nose dive because it takes like 3 women to do 1 man's job for physical labor. There would also be considerably fewer innovations in technology.

[Rabbitjb]

Efficiency would take a huge nose dive because it takes like 3 women to do 1 man's job for physical labor. There would also be considerably fewer innovations in technology.

Admittedly women are weaker, but how many tasks require simple brute strength? And how can that be improved upon?

Innovation would not cease ...with only one sex there would be no incentive for women to focus on the preening, attention grabbing I’m just a sexual being persona that some choose and the development of their intellect, innovation and ability would become more prized

Women do the dumb chit cos they’re allowed to get away with it, cos they have choices to live as a sex object or a nurturer

[guest89]

Do you think the straight ones would start to crave the caawk from other species?

Judging from the amount of chicks that let their dog hump them/lick their pussy I think its safe to say all the dog/horse chicks would be getting humped.

[Muzzlrpress]

I know you've always been a WK but this post just took it to another level

What's needed to survive? Food and shelter. You don't think women could manage that much? Don't call me a wk because you think women are basically retarded. Never said they get anything done nearly as efficiently, they'd just survive.

[Maatkarah]

Yes of course. We could debate efficiency all day, but survive implies base level.

More importantly, a world without male cuddles? To me that's even worse than a world without cawk.

I know you've always been a WK but this post just took it to another level

Muzzl is so not a WK; he's been an utterly cheeky kent to me in the past.

[hai2dehfolks]

i have female family member ranging from soon to be doctor, to believes in healing rocks from a mall cart. As much as i respect all of them i have to say absolutely not. while there will be pockets of women that will do just fine, the majority really lack any shred of common sense, let alone basic survival skills.

The "pockets" of females who survive would be the ones who would rebuild everything. Survival of the fittest and all that. If men weren't around, then the ones who couldn't hack it would die quickly. And that's good. Sure, the government and most structured things would fail.... At first. Until the strongest of the women picked it up and restarted it again. There are women in basically every important field. We would see a rapid decline in population, before seeing a reconfigured rise. Whether it be clones or sperm banks, we'd find a way. Bc not all women are stupid and incapable. Regardless of what the misc teaches you or your own personal experience with stupid, incapable women.

[Tyrannosaur88]

My god, i'm getting off topic here but that face and smile at the end... melted my heart.
This gif did more for me than the ass ones posted earlier in this thread srs

[BericDondarrion]

My god, i'm getting off topic here but that face and smile at the end... melted my heart.
This gif did more for me than the ass ones posted earlier in this thread srs

Got to say, I agree. Fukin sexy

[RoxyFoxy22]

Of course women would survive without men, sperm bank, training classes for masculine jobs, lots of happy lesbos and flying dildos, but they would...dummy.
Humanity faced the plague, so it can survive without sausages...


OP, are you feeling less important now ? lol

[irmocool]

You know women in the 18 century were miners?
You know in WWII women took over all the domestic male roles and that was in a time when they weren’t considered “equal”
Women have a tendency to do what needs to be done to survive and protect their young (and sperm banks and cloning are a thing)
Humans tend to rise to challenges ..like men would survive without women

Whether we’d want to is another thing

not sure why this made me laugh so hard ....would rep but on recharge

[Lucianus]

And how would men survive without women?

The sexual frustration alone would cause WW3.

The sole reason a lot of men get out of bed every day is to work at gaining a better lifestyle that enable them to attract poosay

Take their purpose away and what happens to them? Just LOL if you think men will be able to cope

[thorpowers]

Females ITT have been watching too many modern hollywood movies where all the women 'kick a$$" and can out smart a man or beat up a man twice her size. Reality is women have evolved to be dependant on men for their survival. Humans are sexually dimorphic and men evolved to be bigger, stronger, more intelligent, faster, ect because men have to protect and provide for a women when she is pregnant. If men were as weak and incapable as women who would protect and provide for the pregnant women and the babies?

[irmocool]

so it's pretty clear short term: they might have a chance
long term: hell the phuck no

---something to consider would of course be what resources are available at the time, so essentially the relics of man would be able to sustain them but only for so long. Disease would surely spread amongst the unclean. Then the predators of nature, lions, tigers, bears , wolves, rabid dogs ect would be lured by the scent of blood(from menses) and yeast infection. The women who know how to handle weaponry(few) will be useful but their stamina and actually proficiency would be nill.
-honestly I would watch a show based on this that were realistic,but of course SJW would make it so that the women survive and establish a better civilization than any man could fathom

Spoiler!

[irmocool]

Of course women would survive without men, sperm bank, training classes for masculine jobs, lots of happy lesbos and flying dildos, but they would...dummy.
Humanity faced the plague, so it can survive without sausages...


OP, are you feeling less important now ? lol

no , but thanks for your petty insults. show us the class of your sex

[zizitopas]

You know women in the 18 century were miners?
You know in WWII women took over all the domestic male roles and that was in a time when they weren’t considered “equal”
Women have a tendency to do what needs to be done to survive and protect their young (and sperm banks and cloning are a thing)
Humans tend to rise to challenges ..like men would survive without women

Whether we’d want to is another thing

You know you are whiteknight?

[zizitopas]

So much this....

[6-SPEED]

There are definitely some women that could manage, but nowhere near enough of them to support all the women that depend on others for survival. A very large percentage of women would be desperate and starving which means the few women that are independent also have to have a way of fighting off millions of desperate women who will come after the food, shelter, and other resources. You're not just going to have pockets of capable women producing their own food and shelter while all the other women just lay down and rot, they'll fight to get to the food.

[Hornlesscow]

The "pockets" of females who survive would be the ones who would rebuild everything. Survival of the fittest and all that. If men weren't around, then the ones who couldn't hack it would die quickly. And that's good. Sure, the government and most structured things would fail.... At first. Until the strongest of the women picked it up and restarted it again. There are women in basically every important field. We would see a rapid decline in population, before seeing a reconfigured rise. Whether it be clones or sperm banks, we'd find a way. Bc not all women are stupid and incapable. Regardless of what the misc teaches you or your own personal experience with stupid, incapable women.

kind of what i meant by the pockets more or less, its just that the ratio of men to women who are able to just leave their life and make it in the wild, are favoring heavily in the mens favor.
like you mentioned, population would decline, by the millions perhaps a billion, but those "pockets" will rebuild city infrastructure, figure out ways to generate power, etc...
Women will survive and rebuild, i have no doubt about that, but i have a feeling that's all they will do
men and our violent tendencies are what brought on most of todays tech and medical advancements.
i think we can both agree on that?


Trust me i know not ALL women are stupid... and stupidly i let her go...

[RoxyFoxy22]

no , but thanks for your petty insults. show us the class of your sex

If a cute "dummy" hurts your feelings, you need to check your hormones, cause this is not a normal level of testosterone :-( . Jk Jk JK, sorry op, I don't want to insult anybody. :-)

[BericDondarrion]

kind of what i meant by the pockets more or less, its just that the ratio of men to women who are able to just leave their life and make it in the wild, are favoring heavily in the mens favor.
like you mentioned, population would decline, by the millions, but those "pockets" will rebuild city infrastructure, figure out ways to generate power, etc...
Women will survive, i have no doubt about that
but men and our violent tendencies are what brought on most of todays tech and medical advancements.
i think we can both agree on that?

Don't forget autism tier intelligence from guys like Tesla and Newton, top lol at some stories from their private lives.

[Hornlesscow]

Of course women would survive without men, sperm bank, training classes for masculine jobs, lots of happy lesbos and flying dildos, but they would...dummy.
Humanity faced the plague, so it can survive without sausages...


OP, are you feeling less important now ? lol

PLEase just stop, you have done enough today, take break

Don't forget autism tier intelligence from guys like Tesla and Newton, top lol at some stories from their private lives.

those guys are sort of "mutations" imo and there is no reason a women can't be as genetically gifted. while i don't want to discredit all their hard work in any way, what i mean is they had a better base for knowledge than the average guy, no reason a women can't be born with the same "conditions" how she chooses to use her gift is a completely other story

[Rabbitjb]

You know you are whiteknight?

lol

[wincel]

Admittedly women are weaker, but how many tasks require simple brute strength? And how can that be improved upon?

Innovation would not cease ...with only one sex there would be no incentive for women to focus on the preening, attention grabbing I’m just a sexual being persona that some choose and the development of their intellect, innovation and ability would become more prized

Women do the dumb chit cos they’re allowed to get away with it, cos they have choices to live as a sex object or a nurturer

A lot more than you'd think. Living in a developed country allows us to forget just how many people must work in farm labor, mining, and factories just to maintain the status quo. Improving upon it requires engineering, an area that women, on average, struggle in.

I disagree with your prediction that it is merely a lack of incentive that prevents females, on average, from succeeding in other areas. Rather, there are distinct biological differences. Your kind is supposed to make babies and raise them. Our kind was meant to build weapons and tools and use them to secure territory and food. Both are important.

Even today, these ancient roles are still better suited to certain genders. (Of course, there are always exceptions.) And there is a reason women are, on average, weaker, worse at spatial reasoning, less aggressive and territorial, smaller, better at verbal skills, better with children, and lactate. You basically evolved to have these traits, and they suit your roles.

[401Delta]

You know you are whiteknight?

lol

She is?

[LegDayLol]

Nah, they would end up nuking their best friends in a heartbeat.

[Fang2]

No, but neither would men. Where would you be if your dad didn't bang your mom op?

[irmocool]

A lot more than you'd think. Living in a developed country allows us to forget just how many people must work in farm labor, mining, and factories just to maintain the status quo. Improving upon it requires engineering, an area that women, on average, struggle in.

I disagree with your prediction that it is merely a lack of incentive that prevents females, on average, from succeeding in other areas. Rather, there are distinct biological differences. Your kind is supposed to make babies and raise them. Our kind was meant to build weapons and tools and use them to secure territory and food.

Reminds me of an argument I had in college waaaay back. The debate was whether women were as physically capable as men in the military. This string bean of a girl , who could barely due a pull up adamently argued that women were more than capable and that she had several friends that could due just as well as any man. While her friends may keep up with some men, the average women would not due to biology. Even the way women perceive reality and communicate differs from men, they are emotionally oriented not fact and logic oriented. This alone would lead to disaster in a crisis situation. I understand that the more masculine amongst them may be able to overcome this weakness, but they would be far and few between at least from my experience of interacting with some bright females in college, medical school, and other walks of life.

[INSANEREACH]

I think women are vastly superior to men in some ways, I have quite a significant mental health problem and I refuse to deal with males in the medical discipline because I believe females are much better in dealing with it. This is from experience, men have been absolute rubbish. And Iam not the only man who thinks that. I know two firemen who refused point black to see male counsellors after a serious incident at work because in reality men just aren't cut out for certain roles. We are the fighters. the explorers, the protectors. we don't talk about feelings to each other like some bored housewives. Men can still get mentally sick , we aren't invincible in which case you talk to a woman about it . The reality is men and women are very different, better suited to different roles, and no amount of social conditioning can change that.

The fact is, without men women I believe would not be able to survive on earth at the very least their living standards would take signifcant hits. There would be more famine and disease for that reason. Men could survive without women, but we would be much poorer emotionally and socially for it,Women are nicer people, smell better, and look more asthetically pleasing, are softer they are the raisers of children. . studies have shown teams of men perform significantly better than teams of women in all sorts of tasks, either mental or physical. It goes to **** when a group of women get together. Real life is not hollywood, mother nature has the capacity to be merciless,incredibly cruel and does not believe in equal opportunity and equal rights.

[irmocool]

No, but neither would men. Where would you be if your dad didn't bang your mom op?

men would absolutely , find a way to clone and create artificial wombs. I believe they would in fact create a female companion that would rid of the flaws of modern females....in fact all of these are being worked on as we speak.

[Hornlesscow]

Reminds me of an argument I had in college waaaay back. The debate was whether women were as physically capable as men in the military. This string bean of a girl , who could barely due a pull up adamently argued that women were more than capable and that she had several friends that could due just as well as any man. While her friends may keep up with some men, the average women would not due to biology. Even the way women perceive reality and communicate differs from men, they are emotionally oriented not fact and logic oriented. This alone would lead to disaster in a crisis situation. I understand that the more masculine amongst them may be able to overcome this weakness, but they would be far and few between at least from my experience of interacting with some bright females in college, medical school, and other walks of life.

this soo fkkin much!
women don't seem to comprehend the word average. and think if there is 1 outlier who is blank, they are all blank.(as long as blank is a good thing)