New TRAVEL BAN EO coming next week!

[moonstarrrrr]

Your family was stupid for paying $20k. I really dont care about your family. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy among conservatives upset with so-called 'sanctuary' cities. Yet entire states are providing sanctuary for pot traffickers and dealers.

Damn, the liberal shows his true colours

[NitrogenWidget]

How many times is Kingtrumper going to get owned in this thread? Chits fun to watch lmao

It's kind of painful to watch at the same time though.

[BFast55]

Your family was stupid for paying $20k. I really dont care about your family. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy among conservatives upset with so-called 'sanctuary' cities. Yet entire states are providing sanctuary for pot traffickers and dealers.

So it is safe to say, when it comes to immigration, you do not support following the law.

[CorgiBrah]

Your family was stupid for paying $20k. I really dont care about your family. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy among conservatives upset with so-called 'sanctuary' cities. Yet entire states are providing sanctuary for pot traffickers and dealers.

Damn, the liberal shows his true colours

So it is safe to say, when it comes to immigration, you do not support following the law.

lol it's true, he literally knows nothing about immigration. stupid for spending 20k? that's almost average you have to pay in expenses for a family, sorry for wanting to do it the LEGAL way and not hopping on a raft hoping to god we will make it to California. The land of legal weed where anyone with half a brain knows federal law supersedes state (lol @ him thinking i didn't know that), but can't make a valid argument for his original point

People that grow pot in their backyards to smoke are criminals.

Sorry brah, feds won't be busting in your house and arresting you randomly for smoking a j in your backyard unless you are doing something illegal

instead he likes to post random articles that he thinks will validate his argument but doesn't read any of them like... smoking on federal land which is out of state jurisdiction(lol).. state.. you know? where it's like... legal

more fake news

http://www.sacbee.com/news/state/cal...125496464.html

Cant be happening...pot is legal in california.

or comparing his original argument

People that grow pot in their backyards to smoke are criminals.

to another link about a medical distribution selling on a commercial level where they were raided and assets seized but not charged with anything criminal.

This must be fake news

http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/...fornia-w453037

Licensed grower. Employees arrested. All assets taken away.

I guess it didn't happen...since you know...its legal in California.

keep on protecting illegal immigrants, clown

[KingTrump2016]

That Trump wasn't serious about all his drug talk during the primary should be obvious to you by now, if you exercise a little independent thought once in a while. Anyway, here you go:

https://thejointblog.com/trump-marijuana-states/

oh....god forbid I take a POTUS for his word....I should just assume he was joking whenever he says something. Except when he is not...then he playing 9D chess. Right?

[KingTrump2016]

Damn, the liberal shows his true colours

Why should I care about a random stranger's family that got bilked for $20k by an immigration lawyer? That's on him. Since you are so compassionate about his plight...Im sure he would accept a small donation.

So it is safe to say, when it comes to immigration, you do not support following the law.

No I am all for the federal government upholding its laws. Ive been anxiously awaiting the DEA to start kicking doors down and enforcing the federal drug laws on the books. I'm not sure why you do not support this.

[KingTrump2016]

The land of legal weed where anyone with half a brain knows federal law supersedes state (lol @ him thinking i didn't know that), but can't make a valid argument for his original point

Poor argument, I know plenty of people who grow pot in their back yards and smoke it, legally.

sure you did.

[CaliSuperSport]

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to CorgiBrah again.

[superiorlogic]

How will this EO impact Illegal immigrants? What % of crime is committed by illegal immigrants vs US citizens?

Terrible argument and you're missing the point you simpleton. You can't keep someone from being a criminal once they are here, but you can keep a criminal from coming here. The primary role of the federal government is to protect its citizens from foreign threats. Why do you think gambling with American lives is OK you unpatriotic filth?


#BUILDTHEWALL
#BANMUSLIMS

[KingTrump2016]

Nice attempt to sow division among us, but Trump isn't rekindling the War on Drugs. Marijuana is here to stay. That battle has been won and we've all moved on, left and right alike.

We're not hoping to bring back slavery either, in case you were wondering...

lol

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...ed-coming.html

"There's two distinct issues here, there is medical marijuana, and recreational marijuana," Spicer explained. He said President Trump supports medical marijuana but when it comes to recreational, "I think that's a question for the Justice Department. I do believe that you'll see greater enforcement of it."

Say it aint so Spicey!!

I swear to baby jesus..I think Trump could phuck you in the butt..if he said..Hey Brah Im just working my glutes..you would say: Im spotting Trump during his workouts. MAGA

[RThoe]

Are there not retired federal judges? Would it be that difficult for him to run the EO by that judge to get an expert opinion on if it's constitutional or not?

The old EO was absolutely constitutional. That wasn't what the court ruled against it on. They ruled that there was no legitimate threat (which is pure bullchit, over 70 immigrants/refugees from the 7 countries have been convicted of terrorism since 9/11, not to mention the countless crime and murder caused by immigrants/refugees from those 7). It's easier for Trump to reword a new EO than to wait for Gorsuch to be confirmed.

[VirtueSignal]

The old EO was absolutely constitutional. That wasn't what the court ruled against it on. They ruled that there was no legitimate threat (which is pure bullchit, over 70 immigrants/refugees from the 7 countries have been convicted of terrorism since 9/11, not to mention the countless crime and murder caused by immigrants/refugees from those 7). It's easier for Trump to reword a new EO than to wait for Gorsuch to be confirmed.

The court asked the government to present evidence that the ban had any merit and they were unable to do so. On the other hand, Washington successfully argued and presented plenty of evidence that its citizens and businesses were damaged by the EO and that the EO presented constitutional infringements on their citizens. Then, the governments request to reinstate the ban was officially stumped and Trump's lawyer was sent packing after doing a terrible job. Trump's new ban may get shot down just as quickly since the government apparently can't argue that the ban actually provides any benefit and everybody knows that this is supposed to be Trump's campaign promise fulfilled of a blanket Muslim ban. It will probably be successfully argued that the motivation for the new ban is not legitimate and rather rooted in bigotry which violates the establishment clause, due process, and equal protection.

[RThoe]

The court asked the government to present evidence that the ban had any merit and they were unable to do so. On the other hand, Washington successfully argued and presented plenty of evidence that its citizens and businesses were damaged by the EO and that the EO presented constitutional infringements on their citizens. Then, the governments request to reinstate the ban was officially stumped and Trump's lawyer was sent packing after doing a terrible job. Trump's new ban may get shot down just as quickly since the government apparently can't argue that the ban actually provides any benefit and everybody knows that this is supposed to be Trump's campaign promise fulfilled of a blanket Muslim ban. It will probably be successfully argued that the motivation for the new ban is not legitimate and rather rooted in bigotry which violates the establishment clause, due process, and equal protection.

I'm, not sure if it was that the government failed to present clear evidence, or that the courts rejected the evidence. There is crystal clear evidence that only takes a few minutes of Googling.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/re...rticle/2614582
"Since 9/11, 72 individuals from the seven mostly Muslim countries covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism, a finding that clashes sharply with claims from an appeals court that there is "no evidence" those countries have produced a terrorist.
According to a report out Saturday, at least 17 claimed to be refugees from those nations, three came in as "students," and 25 eventually became U.S. citizens."

Here are more examples

http://theblacksphere.net/2017/01/fl...fugees-in-u-s/

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qae...ry?id=20931131

http://www.voanews.com/a/****li-amer...t/2469462.html

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ta-****li-ref/

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isi...itants-n204941

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/15/u...ml?ref=us&_r=0

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/17/u...n-us.html?_r=0






This isn't even covering the seemingly endless examples of refugees/immigrants from those seven countries committing crimes, including murder.

[VirtueSignal]

I'm, not sure if it was that the government failed to present clear evidence, or that the courts rejected the evidence.

The government was unable to present evidence that it would be harmed by continuing the ban on the EO.

The proceedings were broadcast.

There is crystal clear evidence that only takes a few minutes of Googling.

...

Perhaps you should send a nice email to the Attorney General's office to offer up your brief google search.

[scheal]

Every ILLEGAL is a criminal. Some worse than others

[Nocturnal310]

can't wait for supreme court to block trump again and for rapefugees to take over USA

MAGA

[second2noneBrah]

But people jumping the border without proper process, illegal.

What makes them able to skip the line when my family has paid 20k+ and have waited 13 years for the rest of my family in Vietnam to come from over?

Sorry to hear that. I have no doubt you and your family will MAGA

can't wait for supreme court to block trump again and for rapefugees to take over USA

MAGA

Uh it hasn't made it there yet...