|
Thread: Guns make us equal.
-
11-16-2019, 05:23 PM #31
-
11-16-2019, 05:26 PM #32
-
-
11-16-2019, 05:31 PM #33
because still deaths
You can't 'no true gun death'.
Beyond pathetic and unintelligent.
Look at idk...Congo, swimming in AKs, chopped off heads, skulls everywhere.
Maybe without all those rifles they would have been a little happier instead of all the self defense obviously happeningEX IGNORANTIA AD SAPIENTIAM
EX LUCE AD TENERBRAS
-
11-16-2019, 05:31 PM #34
-
11-16-2019, 05:34 PM #35
-
11-16-2019, 05:35 PM #36
-
-
11-16-2019, 05:40 PM #37
-
11-16-2019, 05:42 PM #38
-
11-16-2019, 05:45 PM #39
-
11-16-2019, 06:51 PM #40
-
-
11-16-2019, 06:58 PM #41
-
11-16-2019, 07:12 PM #42
The media has a lot to do with the current hysteria over firearms.
Here is a video of an Australian guy walking through the streets with a rifle in the 70s and no one even gives a damn.
Yet it took just one mass shooting to disarm the entire population. Crazy.
Some have suggested Australia was a beta testing ground for a false flag event by the CIA to disarm the population in the US.
Last edited by Eugenics; 11-16-2019 at 07:18 PM.
-
11-16-2019, 07:24 PM #43
-
11-16-2019, 07:24 PM #44
-
-
11-16-2019, 09:53 PM #45
i dunno man, i cant think of a single reason. frankly, if youre 18 you should have a nuke.
all countries should have nukes, and all people in all countries
nobody shouldnt have a nuke
or chemical weapons
or biological weapons
frankly an aerosol smallpox bomb is really the only way to protect your family
-
11-16-2019, 09:54 PM #46
gunz are good- **** way of thinking is not, GROW UP kids. we dont hurt nobody for BS
MR.PHF '09
“Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them.â€- Don Quixote
''Damn right I like the life I live
'Cause I went from negative to positive
And it's all Good..."
"Friends come and go but Enemies Accumulate"
"Zero tolerance Crew" ZERO, NADA !!!!
-
11-16-2019, 10:41 PM #47
-
11-16-2019, 10:51 PM #48
-
-
11-16-2019, 10:51 PM #49
-
11-16-2019, 11:06 PM #50
its not what you need to defend your house, its what you need to defend from government tyranny, you cuck3d smiling *******. You dont get it. You are soft. A product of too much comfort. Basically how rome fell. Keep coping beta. You and your kind will eventually erode us. Not me. But the country as a whole.
-
11-16-2019, 11:22 PM #51
the second amendment gives the right to bear ALL ARMS, not just firearms
as far as im concerned, nukes, landmines, gatling guns, explosive rounds, grenades, biological and chemical weapons are ALL TYPES OF ARMAMENTS that i think i have the constitutional right to possess without restriction or background checks of any kind
dont tread on me bro
-
11-16-2019, 11:29 PM #52
you stop home invaders with something like this
talking bullsh_t about WMDs is ridiculous and does not prove your point, whatever it is...
what im saying is that you are a delusional piece of sh_t who thinks that a rifle is the same level of power as a WMD. guess what genius, you cant kill millions of people instantly with a rifle. trying to equate a rifle to that is flawed thinking.
and btw, the founding fathers did intend for the people to have access to the same types of weapons as the govt. i doubt they had nukes in mind when they wrote the constitution, but modern firearms yes, they absolutely intended for us to have them, and that would include machine guns, suppressors and short barrel rifles and shotguns.Last edited by 4ea; 11-16-2019 at 11:41 PM.
Merica
<I.L.H.|C.O.E.>
RIP YGST
-
-
11-16-2019, 11:37 PM #53
-
11-17-2019, 12:38 AM #54
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Location: Newport, Rhode Island, United States
- Posts: 29,355
- Rep Power: 272927
At the time the Constitution was written, it was legal to take a ship, load its decks with cannon, and sail where you wished.
To be clear, a private citizen could own a ship that could bombard a harbor city into oblivion.
NBC weapons pose a national security risk to the country.
Small arms, even tanks, do not.
The fact that you have to use a weapon which cannot be defensive in nature to make your argument shows that you have no argument.
Thanks for playing.Florida Crew as of 3/21
What part of "Shall Not Be Infringed" are you having trouble with?
Misc Firearms Crew
-
11-17-2019, 12:55 AM #55
-
11-17-2019, 03:09 AM #56
-
-
11-17-2019, 03:32 AM #57
To get my uni degree I didn't need to own a gun. I learned ti shoot one but that's about it.
I didn't need a gun to get any of the jobs I had.
Women think they are more equal when they drive an SUV. But it's the men in HGV that don't stop on cycle lanes and wave me across when the road is clear and they can't go. The women just sit there and stare ahead.
I get off the bike and cross the street in front of their SUV. If I scratch it - well bad luck.Cycling, walking, swimming.
No car.
-
11-17-2019, 04:34 AM #58
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 130,807
- Rep Power: 564605
"The idea in my concept is that those who feel they must take up arms to defend their cause must have the ability to effectively do their oppressors significant harm. So their best weapons must not be mere heated words, pointed sticks, and other low-effect tools. A portion of society that feels all hope of peaceful redress of grievances through the legislative process is lost, must have the ability to act effectively in violent concert.
On the other hand, the goal of insurrection as promoted by the Founders in the Declaration of Independence and other documents is not that ONE person could have the power to force his will on others, and/or destroy towns, and kill mass numbers of people. So there is a practical reason for why ordnance (and the sorts of mass-effect weapons that have been developed, from nerve gasses to nuclear weapons) are not in the hands of the individual.
There is a balance here. We don't want one man to have the ability to wipe out a city because he's not happy. The individual with his rifle, or with his machine gun, grenades, and other anti-personnel weapons doesn't present a credible threat to society at large, and is not a compelling force for governmental change and/or resistance. But a large number of individuals all dedicated to one goal and armed with conventional arms may be so."
-sam1911
"
-
11-17-2019, 04:46 AM #59
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 56,711
- Rep Power: 584846
"Do you think SHE actually felt like that was a sexual thing he was doing? She's like 6. Only an actual p3do would think that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossible to touch a minor inappropriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognize someone putting a hand on their chest as groping, whether it is inappropriate or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
-
11-17-2019, 06:14 AM #60
Bookmarks