I'm in the market for a new ride.
Strong preference for a 2017/18 GX 460 (I really don't like the new face lift) but I'm open to other options. My question is... how costly are these to repair? I'm looking for an SUV to last me the next 15 years with minimal maintenance/repair cost. I hear that they are reliable but want to hear what misc has to say.
Any other suggestions for an SUV that I'm overlooking?
What I'm looking for:
- Reliable
- Low tech
- V8
- 3 rows
Thanks,
|
-
11-16-2020, 09:02 AM #1
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: Gladwyne, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 11,401
- Rep Power: 54273
Lexus GX 460 and other SUV questions
-
11-16-2020, 09:13 AM #2
-
11-16-2020, 09:17 AM #3
-
11-16-2020, 09:29 AM #4
It's a good SUV. However it is based on a 4Runner and has had the same frame for a decade.
My wife begged to test drive one last week. Thankfully she drove an X5 first and that's all she needed.
Q80 is good but horrific gas mileage. 12 mpg. And with Biden and his climate change BS, you'll see gas prices rise again.
I like the MDX better.
-
-
11-16-2020, 10:02 AM #5
-
11-16-2020, 10:26 AM #6
-
11-16-2020, 10:27 AM #7
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: Gladwyne, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 11,401
- Rep Power: 54273
-
11-16-2020, 04:50 PM #8
-
-
11-16-2020, 05:30 PM #9
-
11-16-2020, 08:18 PM #10
-
11-17-2020, 06:52 AM #11
-
11-17-2020, 10:07 AM #12
That means it has 15 years of proven reliability. It makes 300hp and 320 torks which is more than enough unless you want to 1) tow 8000lbs; 2) race SRTs
OP, the GX will be the cheapest in long term when it comes to reliability and maintenance. yes they look ugly from outside, but you're not going to stand in front and stare at it for hours. Only reason not to get it is if you need something bigger like Tahoe/Yukon or you need more towing capacity.
Also lol @ people mentioning X5 when op is concerned about reliability.Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly.
-
-
11-17-2020, 07:48 PM #13
-
11-17-2020, 07:52 PM #14
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: Gladwyne, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 11,401
- Rep Power: 54273
Exactly, I'm not a very aggressive driver to begin with.
I think the design on the GX is just fine. I mainly care about the utility of cars/SUVs.
Do you think it makes sense to get one of these... 8 years old, 1 owner and impeccable service record:
2012 Lexus GX 460
Haldeman Lexus of Princeton
$19,350
(609) 912-2162
http://atcm.co/S2PVDP/21d312c0
OR just get a 3 year old one with about 30k miles for about $40k
I can afford to buy the 2012 with cash but would need to finance if I'm getting the more expensive option. Anything to look out for with getting a 2012 GX 460 w that many miles?
I prefer the styling of the 2012... has hints of Land Cruiser on the front.
-
11-17-2020, 08:43 PM #15
Thats not what it means. The BMW N63 4.4 V8 has been in BMW's since 2008 and it was a turd until atleast 2018. And its still being used in their new cars.
It just means that lexus never updated it. Also its not hard to be reliable when you are barely putting any stress on the engine at all. 300hp out of 4.6 Liters isnt some incredible feat of engineering. Its just a really really low output V8.IW3725-04, Black 116520, White 26320
-
11-17-2020, 08:45 PM #16
-
-
11-17-2020, 08:57 PM #17
-
11-17-2020, 11:40 PM #18
The GX460 V8 isnt something you typically think of when you think of V8s. It doesnt really sound like a V8, especially with the stock Lexus exhaust. Its not very torquey and anything with low HP/Liter is gonna be reliable. But the V8 will drink gas like its water.
Unless you are getting something like a 500hp V8, I would just get a newer turbo V6. They make cost less to maintain, make more power, consume less gas and are probably just as reliable.
3 Rows - Escalade, GLE, GLS, X7, Q7, Model X, GV80, Hyundai Palisade, Kia Telluride
How much do you want to spend is a better question. Each of those options I listed vary wildly in price.IW3725-04, Black 116520, White 26320
-
11-18-2020, 05:56 AM #19
Honestly both of those are pretty good deals. I'd personally go with the newest I can afford. That gives you some warranty, usually better safety, and newer parts. No matter how reliable a car is, it will still have aging electronics. Great SUVs if you want to keep for 300k miles.
that's a very weird counter argument lol
ok now i'm not sure if you're just tunafisha alt account or trollingLast edited by Jax05; 11-18-2020 at 06:02 AM.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly.
-
11-18-2020, 08:10 PM #20
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: Gladwyne, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 11,401
- Rep Power: 54273
It's not about the sound, it's about the power delivery and long term reliability. Understressed V8s always have the longest lifespans. The gas mileage isn't terrible for what it is... I dont drive in the city often and there are plenty of people reporting 22-24 highway miles with this suv.
Unless you are getting something like a 500hp V8, I would just get a newer turbo V6. They make cost less to maintain, make more power, consume less gas and are probably just as reliable.
-
-
11-18-2020, 08:13 PM #21
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: Gladwyne, Pennsylvania, United States
- Posts: 11,401
- Rep Power: 54273
Valid point, I'll go with something newer then. Buy once cry once.
Thats exactly what I do with my daily drivers. There's just not many options out there that offer long term reliability. Too much tech, too many moving parts, too many things to break. As long as I have a decent sound system, heated seats and a few other minor features, I can compromise on the other things.
Bookmarks