Can you live in a country where liberals...

[Skwidward]

He only answers it with a caveat that changes the OP question

The second question isn't relevant

And I assumed he meant “yes”

You assumed he meant “no”

You were wrong

That ^ is the only argument you and I have

[Cleveland33]

And I assumed he meant “yes”

You assumed he meant “no”

You were wrong

That ^ is the only argument you and I have

Here we go again...lol...context matters

[ezmac31]

If OP is trolling this is a masterpiece. His responses read like someone who speaks English as a 5th language and doesn’t really understand what is being said/asked.

[Skwidward]

Here we go again...lol...context matters

The “context” is with what you’re having a problem

The context is:

-a world in which democrats have taken over academia and the media

In such a world, Leonudus states he cannot live with what’s described in the OP

You claim that he does not believe he is living in such a world

I say he does

He said he does

Yet, you still deny that

[Cleveland33]

The “context” is with what you’re having a problem

The context is:

-a world in which democrats have taken over academia and the media

In such a world, Leonudus states he cannot live with what’s described in the OP

You claim that he does not believe he is living in such a world

I say he does

He said he does

Yet, you still deny that

The world described in the OP does not exist in what he described.

[Skwidward]

If OP is trolling this is a masterpiece. His responses read like someone who speaks English as a 5th language and doesn’t really understand what is being said/asked.

I disagree with Cleveland33’s claim that Leonydus does not believe he is currently living in a world in which democrats have taken over academia and the media, despite Leonydus stating that he does

the answer is no, they tend to take over every key position of a nation. in USA they have taken over our media, academia, and decides who can be a politician. if you zoom out the graph, the right in this country hasn't gained any ground in over 100 years. the eagle got infected with a parasite back in 1913

If you’d like to show how Leonydus says in the above quote that he doesn’t believe he’s living in a world where Democrats have taken over academia and the media, I’m all ears

[Cleveland33]

I disagree with Cleveland33’s claim that Leonydus does not believe he is currently living in a world in which democrats have taken over academia and the media, despite Leonydus stating that he does

If you’d like to show how Leonydus says in the above quote that he doesn’t believe he’s living in a world where Democrats have taken over academia and the media, I’m all ears

His answer to the OP was yes with a caveat.

[Skwidward]

The world described in the OP does not exist in what he described.

The dude said “no”

It’s his post, and he even clarified what he meant

What’s your problem?

You didn’t even address the OP yourself

You just want to argue with me that some other poster didn’t say something he did

[Skwidward]

His answer to the OP was yes with a caveat.

the answer is no, they tend to take over every key position of a nation. in USA they have taken over our media, academia, and decides who can be a politician. if you zoom out the graph, the right in this country hasn't gained any ground in over 100 years. the eagle got infected with a parasite back in 1913

He disagrees with you ^

Why don’t you move past trying to misunderstand someone else’s answer to the question in the OP and address it yourself?

There’s a decent discussion to be had here, but you wanna play in gutter

[Leonydus]

op your medication wore off i assume

[Cleveland33]

He disagrees with you ^

Why don’t you move past trying to misunderstand someone else’s answer to the question in the OP and address it yourself?

There’s a decent discussion to be had here, but you wanna play in gutter

it continues after he says no, where you see that be doesn't believe the OP situation can exist

[Skwidward]

it continues after he says no, where you see that be doesn't believe the OP situation can exist

If "he doesn't believe the OP situation can exist," then his answer to the OP question is "no"

[Cleveland33]

If "he doesn't believe the OP situation can exist," then his answer to the OP question is "no"

That's not how English works

[Skwidward]

he didn't say no

That's a side question from your original post.

My post was to point out that Leonydus did not say no to your original question.

I'm pretty sure "not when..." indicates that he believes you CAN (which is a yes to your question) without that caveat, which you removed from your original question.

His answer to the OP was yes with a caveat.

it continues after he says no, where you see that be doesn't believe the OP situation can exist

Wait, so now you are able to see that his answer to the OP was "no"?

[Cleveland33]

Wait, so now you are able to see that his answer to the OP was "no"?

His answer to the OP is not no.

[Skwidward]

His answer to the OP is not no.

I'm done with that particular avenue of nonsense with you

Moving on:

Can you live in a country where liberals, transgender, atheist, satanist, globalist, and betas keep themselves to themselves but are allowed certain respect for holidays etc. and they don’t fukc with your way of life, you don’t fukc with theirs and we all pay taxes and vote?

[Cleveland33]

I'm done with that particular avenue of nonsense with you

Moving on:

Can you live in a country where liberals, transgender, atheist, satanist, globalist, and betas keep themselves to themselves but are allowed certain respect for holidays etc. and they don’t fukc with your way of life, you don’t fukc with theirs and we all pay taxes and vote?

You can move on but it doesn't change his answer

[Skwidward]

You can move on but it doesn't change his answer

I asked the question

He answered

Get over it, child

Question still stands:

Can you live in a country where liberals, transgender, atheist, satanist, globalist, and betas keep themselves to themselves but are allowed certain respect for holidays etc. and they don’t fukc with your way of life, you don’t fukc with theirs and we all pay taxes and vote?

[Cleveland33]

I asked the question

He answered

Get over it, child

Question still stands:

Can you live in a country where liberals, transgender, atheist, satanist, globalist, and betas keep themselves to themselves but are allowed certain respect for holidays etc. and they don’t fukc with your way of life, you don’t fukc with theirs and we all pay taxes and vote?

and he answered no

[Skwidward]

and he answered no

Then why post in this thread to tell me he didn't?

[Cleveland33]

Then why post in this thread to tell me he didn't?

because I know what you are trying to do and I like pointing it out

[Skwidward]

because I know what you are trying to do and I like pointing it out

You argued that someone who said "no" really meant "yes" for like 2 pages, and now you are saying he did say "no"

What is it I'm "trying to do"?

[Cleveland33]

You argued that someone who said "no" really meant "yes" for like 2 pages, and now you are saying he did say "no"

What is it I'm "trying to do"?

No, I am not saying that at all.

And I have explained what you are trying to do earlier and in previous threads.

[Skwidward]

No, I am not saying that at all.

And I have explained what you are trying to do earlier and in previous threads.

*sigh*

I didn’t really give the question in the OP too much thought

I learn something every time I start a thread

One of the reasons this forum is entertaining is that you’re able to test out beliefs and arguments you have by having them challenged and defending them

This is what I like about this place

In this particular thread, I began with the belief that anyone and everyone should answer yes to the question in the OP. This is a tentative “stance” I kinda have/had and was willing to defend it

However, since interacting with those who responded, I’m able to see the question in the OP in a completely different light

If you’re interested, I have been enlightened to the fact that there’s a possibility there is no way to answer the OP question other than “no,” which is the opposite of what I originally believed

I would have liked to discuss this with someone like yourself who obviously enjoys the back and forth, but instead of that we end up arguing about whether or not another poster answered “yes” or “no,” which as it turns out was a big farce as really you were trying to teach me a lesson by dragging my thread into the gutter because I dared question someone with beliefs different from own

Well done

And if anyone besides Cleveland33 is still reading, yeah, I do engage trolls

Their goal is to disrupt your thread by frustrating you

My goal is to keep giving them the rope with which they’ll eventually hang themselves when they admit that their goal was just that

————

[Skwidward]

His answer to the OP is not no.

and he answered no

I hate to call someone a troll, but ^

[Cleveland33]

If you’re interested, I have been enlightened to the fact that there’s a possibility there is no way to answer the OP question other than “no,” which is the opposite of what I originally believed

That’s funny cause several people said yes and you interpreted it as no. And you did something similar in previous threads

I would have liked to discuss this with someone like yourself who obviously enjoys the back and forth, but instead of that we end up arguing about whether or not another poster answered “yes” or “no,”

I’m sorry either your comprehension is that bad, you’re that resolved to push a narrative that you can’t see it, or you’re doing it intentionally.

which as it turns out was a big farce as really you were trying to teach me a lesson by dragging my thread into the gutter

That’s not why, I’ve explained it to you numerous times

because I dared question someone with beliefs different from own

Nope this has nothing to do with what anyone believes

My goal is to keep giving them the rope with which they’ll eventually hang themselves when they admit that their goal was just that

I’ve never hidden my goal in responding to you. I’ve told you several times directly.

[Skwidward]

That’s funny cause several people said yes and you interpreted it as no. And you did something similar in previous threads


I’m sorry either your comprehension is that bad, you’re that resolved to push a narrative that you can’t see it, or you’re doing it intentionally.


That’s not why, I’ve explained it to you numerous times


Nope this has nothing to do with what anyone believes


I’ve never hidden my goal in responding to you. I’ve told you several times directly.

I gave you multiple chances to address the OP... I’m talking pages of your incessant trolling...

I’ve even given you multiple chances to make your case for what ever it is you’re accusing but not accusing me of “doing,” but I’m done now

To me you’re nothing but a trolling child who’s only purpose for posting in any I thread I make is to troll

I’m done with you

[Cleveland33]

I gave you multiple chances to address the OP... I’m talking pages of your incessant trolling...

I’ve even given you multiple chances to make your case for what ever it is you’re accusing but not accusing me of “doing,” but I’m done now

To me you’re nothing but a trolling child who’s only purpose for posting in any I thread I make is to troll

I’m done with you

I have no interest in responding to the OP after I tried with a previous thread. I have explained many times after that as to why I continue to respond to your threads.

[Dogkrack]

i remember when i was a kid that i was deeply offended the ayatolla called america the great satan. turns out he was right.