Exactly. Most average ppl don't understand bodybuilding anyway. I don't understand the logic of this thread. By this reasoning, every loss by a reigning Mr. O should have changed bodybuilding somehow...
I really don't give a flying **** how hard someone trains. It's how you LOOK! That's what bodybuilding is, if it wasn't then they would judge training. I agree, he's had his day, over. Don't feel...
good comments. I loved it when he said "What place do I put him in, or what place will he get?" Clear definition of someone knowing the politics ect..bias' vs how a professional views others. I...
Agreed. Branch is a dick. Who cares how hard someone works? It's not a hard working contest anyway. Its a bodybuilding contest. How you look on stage is THE ONLY thing that matters. I sick of hearing...
Good Stuff. Better than a lot of crap I've seen out there. Some of these pics Ive never seen, which is a nice touch. In general, bodybuilding is shrouded in a lot of mystery and speculation. Many...
because CALVES are waaaaaaay more important than forearms. Whoever heard of someone losing becuase of poor developed forearms? "Well his chest his poor, but his forearms make up for that!" wtf???
Arnold was sooo dehydrated in 1980. looked terrible. Dickerson, probably should have won. Just because Mentzer thinks he should have won, doesn't mean anything, he ALWAYS thought he should have. 1981...
Has anybody read Randy Roach's new book? Muscle, Smoke and Mirrors? Supposedly he states in the book how some "rigging of contests" was done. just wondering. Otherwise I don't believe any rigging...
-This is the only comment that seems to be based on some good info vs the "my favorite bodybuilder" complex. While samsbolton gives good reasons for his picks, I still have to ask the question: HOW...
I love Sergio, but he wasn't truly the best of the 1970's. too smooth. that's what Arnold changed! Zane is one of my faves and looks great, but I think Robby Robinson never got his due.
