Search:

you don't have any rep power.

and no, protein does not evaporate into the air http://smiliesftw.com/x/bowrofl.gif

1-ad does not convert to boldenone

lemonade, at least the container i have, doesn't dissolve very well. I always have big particles floating around. The watermelon seems to be a much finer powder.

ml is volume, mcg is mass, conversion would depend on the substance.

what you are doing here is like worrying whether your helmet is on tight enough before you jump out of a plane without a parachute.

these little details are not the things you need to be...

the phd chemist that did the final lab report that was posted in this thread, dr. lykissa - PA was questioning its validity and ibe was going to arrange for them to speak

that's not what i meant, are you talking about dr d?

what ever came of that stuff with IBE's PHD chemist? Nothing?

how do you think the injectables are made? from a powder. It's useless unless you know what you are doing with it, but it definitely exists.

if that was the case though, i'd think the lab would have been able to identify it as such? they did say that the results did not match any known compound.

ok let's make this really simple

1 - each capsule contains 323mg of powder

2 - of that 323mg, it is ESTIMATED that 3.8mg of it is the active ingredient, while the label claims 10mg.

3 - the...

this is true.

but they ARE saying that the estimated amount of active per capsule is 3.8mg. they obtained this value using the weight of testosterone, since they have no standard for the claimed...

yes you are right, although we have no idea what the margin of error for this estimation is.

i don't know how that relates to what i said at all. I explained the results in simple terms. The results are - they don't know what the compound is.

.3229g is 323mg

the label claims 10mg of active. the rest is filler.

but if Mike bought primaforce, then they're not owned by the same person anymore? or did mike buy both?

it matters if you are concerned with side effects, liver toxicity, etc... Obviously you are taking a risk with any of these designer compounds, but say you take the time to research a particular...

the bottom line is that the results are in-line with that should be expected for the tests that were done.

it's the other way around. One need not prove malicious intent. As a defense, statements made in good faith and reasonable belief that they were true are the same as true statements. However, is it...

so you feel this is the same reason that IBE got the results they did, and that they misinterpreted the meaning? Any idea where they came up with the 60/40 number that's been thrown around?