Search:

I’m not suggesting anything like that.

I’m trying to explain by way of analogy why it was more wrong, in comparison to Steele’s actions, for Trump to attempt to benefit from the Russia...

Thank you. I put a lot of effort into crafting a logical and persuasive argument, and even when you use the slightly pejorative term, narrative, it is still something I consider a compliment.


...

It’s important for everyone to know there is not a shred of evidence indicating this is true.

Yes, and it doesn’t matter.

The fact is the DNC and Steele did not conduct an intelligence operation against the United States nor did they try and work with an active, hostile intelligence...

During Watergate the prosecutors were able to legally release their report, including Grand Jury testimony, by getting the permission of the Judge.

They can do the same for the Mueller report.

That's not for Trump decide, or any of his supporters. That's not how our government works.

So, what you're doing here is making an argument using a logical fallacy, Appeal to Authority.

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/21/Appeal-to-Authority

Your...

This isn't an argument:

1 + Nadler is fat = Congress cannot investigate Trump

This isn't an argument:

1 + Beo is Patrick = There was a vast, Deep State conspiracy against Trump.

It was okay, and here's why:

When Steele contacted individual Russians who had some association or knowledge of what the Russian government was doing to HARM the United States, Steele was, in...

You have no idea what you're talking about. You and other conspiracy theorists mix stuff up quite often. You claim to be an expert on this stuff, but you're always getting things wrong, and the...

But Mueller did investigate this.

Steele sniffed out an active intelligence operation on part of the Russian government AGAINST the United States to interfere in the 2016 election. This...

A logical argument is like a simple mathematical equation.

A logical argument is a lot like this:

1 + 2 = 3.

The following is a logical argument with an unsupported conclusion, it's okay to...

Read my posts. Everything I am writing here is backed up by facts. I've referenced every major point I've made quoting directly from the Mueller report or Barr's letter, or Barr's press conference.
...

It's in the report. Volume 1. Two confirmed instances of Trump's associates and/or campaign personnel reaching out to Russian agents. The Peter Smith project and the Trump Tower meeting.

Read it....

They both took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

But I am glad you agree that Congress has a Constitutionally-mandated oversight role of the executive unlike the...

You don't get it. The AG answers to the President, and both the President and the AG are entrusted with their roles to act on behalf of the Republic.

So in Barr's public statements or through his...

I would, had I known about it. I honestly wasn't paying much attention to politics back then. Partly because the Obama administration wasn't as much of a clusterf*ck as this one.

Do you agree the...

Don't reach out to Russian intelligence in an attempt to help win a political office, and the FBI won't investigate you. It's not complicated.

It is what it is.

It also isn't what it isn't, contrary to the popular view expressed in this thread.

The bottom line is that Mueller did not find enough evidence to prove that anyone in the Trump campaign committed the crime of conspiracy, provable beyond a reasonable doubt.

This can be true, and...