Search:

I know, right? Damn that empirical evidence. It's so inconvenient.





Beatings: When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be...

The beautiful thing is that it provides sources so that you can investigate it yourself.

That's actually a logical fallacy called "Appeal to ignorance". You are saying because you don't understand how it could have evolved, it therefor must not of evolved.


To answer your question...

AKA: "I'm talking out my ass and couldn't find where you said that."

I eagerly wait for you to show me where I said "People who use neo-darwinism are ignorant".

Yes, yes they do. Do you think 'neo-darwinism' and 'darwinism' are the same word? Hint: they aren't.

People who use the term "darwinism" in the United States do indeed show their ignorance; in the...

/thread

You said people whom have doubts about neo-darwinism are called creationist. I said people who had doubts about neo-darwinism were ignorant about biology. This is how this whole thing got started.
...

You still don't get it. I'm honestly amazed.

1) I said you are ignorant of the theory of evolution. That's my argument. That's it, nothing more, nothing less. If you think it's anything else, then...

Yeah. That's what I thought Mr "I"m so totally not ignorant about evolution!"

No, that's me calling it ignorant. Ignorant does not mean stupid. Ignorant is when you lack knowledge of something. Stupid is when it's difficult for you to learn said knowledge.



It's not...

Actually, I said YOU are ignorant.

But let me inject a few things here:

1) I claimed that darwinism is ignorant, I further backed this up with a quote from wiki talking about how in the US,...

Heh. Okay, if you insist. Did you bother listening to that lecture? I did. He is talking about neo-darwinism in the same sense I am. I never disagreed with you that 'neo-darwinism' doesn't exist. It...

I love how you just compared yourself to Richard Dawkins.

Nope. That's not what I said at all. Go back and read it again.



That you keep calling it "darwinism" shows you are indeed ignorant. You can listen to stuff all you want, that doesn't make you...

Yes. I'm calling you ignorant in biology if you have doubts in 'certain aspects' of evolution. Unless you can point out specific instances that haven't been addressed, of course.

For the record,...

People who have doubts about "neo-Darwinism" whatever that is are simply ignorant about biology, nothing more or less.

Onward, brave christian soldier! Show us the way of Christ by your outstanding example!

Wow. Surprised no one posted this yet.

http://dailybail.com/storage/america-not-1.png
http://jmbell.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/number1.jpg

That wasn't his argument at all, and you are using the straw man fallacy. Also, as you yourself have admitted, the bible is written by man, therefor it also must be scrutinized just like all the...