-
[QUOTE=SoutheastBeast1;1611874081]All that would have been a cute response if he wasn’t on my team in 2013 when I won the championship and he racked up 50 saves for me along the way
But he was and he did so...[/QUOTE]
2013 lulz you dig deep for that one. No one remembers that far back except for you. Been a long sad 7 years for you.
-
[QUOTE=saaltydog;1611875981]2013 lulz you dig deep for that one. No one remembers that far back except for you. Been a long sad 7 years for you.[/QUOTE]
I’m not the one with my foot in my mouth about how someone got no value out of Kimbrel.
That’s when he was most valuable, and that’s what we were talking about.
Like I said, picking up scraps.
If you want to bring up 7 years though, you’re 7 years late with him lmao
-
[QUOTE=SoutheastBeast1;1611879491]I’m not the one with my foot in my mouth about how someone got no value out of Kimbrel.
That’s when he was most valuable, and that’s what we were talking about.
Like I said, picking up scraps.
If you want to bring up 7 years though, you’re 7 years late with him lmao[/QUOTE]
Never said no value. I questioned what value you got out of him. Considering you have 6 straight years of irrelevancy I'm still not convinced. But I guess congrats on 2013 lol.
-
4 more Marlins test positive. What the hell they doing in the clubhouse?
-
Marlins going for that herd immunity.
-
[QUOTE=saaltydog;1611881811]Never said no value. I questioned what value you got out of him. Considering you have 6 straight years of irrelevancy I'm still not convinced. But I guess congrats on 2013 lol.[/QUOTE]
Ok so you question the value, are proven the value, then act like a buffoon talking about 7 years
Face it. Foot in mouth.
And it still doesn’t change the fact you’re 7 years late on the value of Kimbrel.
Say let me say it again, sat around an waited 7 years to pick up to the scraps on Kimbrel.
Prove I’m wrong. Cause I proved you wrong questioning if I got value. Sit there and say 7 years ago is hard to remember all you want but that wasn’t your question.
Owned like bitch. Take you L in this conversation and move on like a man
Nothing more embarrassing than your backpedaling. You’d think the champion of this league would have a little more self respect. Turns out championships don’t seem to breed that
-
[QUOTE=SoutheastBeast1;1611886581]Ok so you question the value, are proven the value, then act like a buffoon talking about 7 years
Face it. Foot in mouth.
And it still doesn’t change the fact you’re 7 years late on the value of Kimbrel.
Say let me say it again, sat around an waited 7 years to pick up to the scraps on Kimbrel.
Prove I’m wrong. Cause I proved you wrong questioning if I got value. Sit there and say 7 years ago is hard to remember all you want but that wasn’t your question.
Owned like bitch. Take you L in this conversation and move on like a man
Nothing more embarrassing than your backpedaling. You’d think the champion of this league would have a little more self respect. Turns out championships don’t seem to breed that[/QUOTE]
Guess we have different opinions on "proof". 1 playoff appearance in 7 years. You kept him last year. Waited half a season to use him and then he **** all over. Doesn't seem like much value at all to me.
But who am I to question the 2013 champion lol.
-
Anyways this conversation is boring I don't really care about it.
-
Pathetic display of a champion happening right now
This league deserves better. Even JY would be a more respectable champion.
-
[QUOTE=SoutheastBeast1;1611889681]Pathetic display of a champion happening right now
This league deserves better. [b]Even JY would be a more respectable champion.[/b][/QUOTE]
We'll never know.
-
[QUOTE=saaltydog;1611891091]We'll never know.[/QUOTE]
Who said I’m leaving?
-
[QUOTE=Jyeatbvg;1611893591]Who said I’m leaving?[/QUOTE]
I made that comment with the assumption you aren't leaving.
-
No indication of any Phillies players testing positive. Yet they still cancel tonights game out of an abundance of caution SMH.
-
[QUOTE=saaltydog;1611894231]No indication of any Phillies players testing positive. Yet they still cancel tonights game out of an abundance of caution SMH.[/QUOTE]
Nationals voted against traveling to Miami
I think Nats should be forced to forfeit those games. You can’t just decide not to play your next opponent assuming MLB clears them.
That sh*t is scheduled 3 days away.
-
[QUOTE=SoutheastBeast1;1611896571]Nationals voted against traveling to Miami
I think Nats should be forced to forfeit those games. You can’t just decide not to play your next opponent assuming MLB clears them.
That sh*t is scheduled 3 days away.[/QUOTE]
I agree if MLB says the games can be played and they choose not to show up. Give them the L's.
-
[QUOTE=SoutheastBeast1;1611896571]Nationals voted against traveling to Miami
I think Nats should be forced to forfeit those games. You can’t just decide not to play your next opponent assuming MLB clears them.
That sh*t is scheduled 3 days away.[/QUOTE]
they just gonna play at the nats field instead? is the contention with players or the place?
i'd agree if they refuse to play against players. to be fair though haven't they just rescheduled games in the past?
with multiple layers of organization these games should be easy
-
Just lol
[img]https://i.ibb.co/02skcbT/Screenshot-2020-07-28-13-51-05.png[/img]
Now playoffs spots will be rewarded based on winning %. Doesn't matter how many games are played.
-
[QUOTE=saaltydog;1611898821]Just lol
[img]https://i.ibb.co/02skcbT/Screenshot-2020-07-28-13-51-05.png[/img]
Now playoffs spots will be rewarded based on winning %. Doesn't matter how many games are played.[/QUOTE]
Well damn Marlins should opt out of all future games ASAP
Pretty sure a .667 win percentage will get you into the field of 16 lol
-
y'all hated on me when i complained about this last season
cant remember who but you told me it was "common" for some teams not to have finished all games, and i thought it was ridiculous that not everybody played 162
i remember it affecting a matchup
-
[QUOTE=propreffered7;1611897811]they just gonna play at the nats field instead? is the contention with players or the place?
i'd agree if they refuse to play against players. to be fair though haven't they just rescheduled games in the past?
with multiple layers of organization these games should be easy[/QUOTE]
I don’t care if it’s the players or the place
They’ve got no right to vote against that. If MLB says it needs to happen then fine.
Nats seemingly think they call the shots or something.
They’ve got a right to opt out, but this is like the players right to opt out this season. Those guys aren’t getting paid.
If the Nats want to opt out of games against Miami, assuming MLB says play on, then those are L’s
No argument otherwise.
Braves still traveled to Tampa
Dodgers still traveled to Houston
Nats aren’t above this sh*t. Get your ass on the plane or forfeit your season. Either way holding private votes saying you won’t play someone or somewhere is entitlement on a new level.
If they want to hold the vote internally the announcement should be they’ve decided to forfeit if they had any dignity, not ask for a work around/special treatment
-
[QUOTE=propreffered7;1611899191]y'all hated on me when i complained about this last season
cant remember who but you told me it was "common" for some teams not to have finished all games, and i thought it was ridiculous that not everybody played 162
i remember it affecting a matchup[/QUOTE]
It’s not anything new. But what is new is ignoring games if it has an impact on playoffs and defaulting to win percentage.
A team who plays 160 games that has a 5 game lead and the division wrapped up doesn’t matter
You’re taking this out of context as usual and I stand by making fun of you for complaining about that. Its how it’s always been for irrelevant games.
This doesn’t sound like they’re just cutting irrelevant games.
-
Marlins Season on hold. lol. Just delete this team.
and the Braves.
-
[QUOTE=SoutheastBeast1;1611899861]It’s not anything new. But what is new is ignoring games if it has an impact on playoffs and defaulting to win percentage.
A team who plays 160 games that has a 5 game lead and the division wrapped up doesn’t matter
You’re taking this out of context as usual and I stand by making fun of you for complaining about that. Its how it’s always been for irrelevant games.
This doesn’t sound like they’re just cutting irrelevant games.[/QUOTE]
i get that it's a 60 game season. but im pretty positive nearly everybody would say the marlins are irrelevant. so.. pretty much irrelevant games
-
jy is the farley of a league
-
[QUOTE=saaltydog;1611882011]4 more Marlins test positive. What the hell they doing in the clubhouse?[/QUOTE]
Rumors swirling around on twitter that some of them visited dollar stores in Atlanta. They were probably eating those wings with Lou Williams.
-
No exaggeration Civale’s breaking stuff is some of the best I’ve seen in years.
-
[QUOTE=propreffered7;1611900571]i get that it's a 60 game season. but im pretty positive nearly everybody would say the marlins are irrelevant. so.. pretty much irrelevant games[/QUOTE]
And yet they just took 2 of 3 from Philly
Stop talking
-
[quote]Juan Soto Reportedly Receiving Conflicting Test Results
Per the report, Soto has registered six negative tests — three from official league tests and three from team-administered tests. He has yet to string together two negatives that qualify to clear him for activation.[/quote]
Oh lord... this is the reliability we’re letting dictate the MLB season as an FYI
6 negative tests, none consecutive, meaning he’s had at least 5 positives interspersed lmao
-
[QUOTE=SoutheastBeast1;1611918051]Oh lord... this is the reliability we’re letting dictate the MLB season as an FYI
6 negative tests, none consecutive, meaning he’s had at least 5 positives interspersed lmao[/QUOTE]
Testing in general is a joke. There's a lot of false positives and false negatives.
-
good god. kyle wright looked ok for a second.
what a fall off. 20 pitches in first 2 innings. now 30 in the 3rd and at 54