PDA

View Full Version : George Bush jizz'z all over us....and does not even wipe us down with a wash cloth



ltll
04-12-2004, 09:52 AM
yea not even a warm wash cloth....I did not write this....but I found it well put...

ltll**






So I'm sure by now you've seen the images of Americans
being dragged through Iraq, burned and mutilated. The
thing is, this has been happening all along, it just
happened to get caught on tape. What you see on Fox
Republican News is so sanitzed, it's unbelievable.
Someone actually told me the other day "oh, it doesn't
look that bad. The buildings look good."
Right...........

But when it comes to issues of George and his love for
our boys just remember this..........

President George W. Bush has NOT ATTENDED A SINGLE
funeral for any personnel killed in Iraq.

All TV crews have been banned from Dover Air Force
Base, where the dead bodies of American Servicemen
killed in Iraq arrive.
President George "I Love My Boys" Bush, while at a
Veterans Day Parade, signed a bill slashing Veteran's
Benefits. A week later, he tried to cut Hazard Pay
for active servicemen in Iraq. After a huge public
outcry, he reversed course (on the hazard pay). But
he did bring them a turkey, which cost taxpayers $3 M.
www.cnn.com/2004/US/03/26/body.armor.ap/
Families are purchasing their own body armor for their
loved ones, because our wonderful Pentagon, with it's
ever growing budget, doesn't supply our boys with the
proper equipment. In October, 25% of soldiers were
still without any armor. And reservists (which are
being called up in ever increasing numbers) aren't
being given any.

Halliburton (Dick Cheney) has lost one Army contract,
so far, after overcharging soldiers $63 M for food services.

costofwar.com
The war in Iraq is costing us $1500/second.

So as the Pentagon budget keeps growing
astronomically, year after year, to the detriment of
our social programs, and national debt, you can see
there is no benefit to the soldier on the ground.
This is my problem with the Bush Administration in
every sector, not just the military. Just like his
tax cuts, George Bush is interested ONLY in
transferring wealth UPWARD to a select few. The
contracts go out to his friends (former Pres. George
H.W. Bush (part of the Carlyle Group)STILL sits in on
classified meetings where contracts are discussed that
then go out to Carlyle Group companies (if it wasn't a
conflict of interest, I personally would have no
problem with any former Pres. sitting in).

I've heard a couple arguments that are ludicrous. By
now, no one believes the WMD story. But they have
substituted Democracy, Liberation. Ostriches, WE have
problems with democracy, after 200+ years, and we
WANTED it. Now we're trying to force a difficult
system on a people unprepared, unwanting, and
uneducated for it. Some people also substitute Human
Rights as justification. "Look at all the mass
graves", the torture chambers. I hope you agree with
me then that the U.S. should be on trial along with
Saddam when(if) he goes to court. As with most
horrible dictators, rebel leaders, the U.S. put Saddam
in power. Go look it up. You don't have to believe
me. He was the leader of the Ba'ath Party, and we
needed him to fight the EVIL IRANIANS. And he was
willing to do that because he is secular. We knew
what he was BEFORE we put him in power (yes, he was
killing and assassinating back then, why do you think
he was in exile?) and we still went ahead. Just like
when George H.W. Bush put Osama Bin Laden on the IA's
payroll, we needed him to fight the Russians (it's not
like we're hiring humanitarians, people, we're hiring
killers to kill; why are we surprised when things
don't work out). Just like Noriega, Suharto,
Milosevic, Pinoche, etc..........What really needs to
be on trial is American History.... I'm getting
really BORED of this "you're just Bush haters"
argument. People who say that can't come up with
anything intelligent to debate you with. They just
try and sweep you away with this statement, like we
just arbitrarily picked George to hate this year. If
you refuse to see all the massive amounts of evidence
in front of you, you're either completely STUPID
(which I don't believe), or you choose to only see the
evidence which fits your previously held conclusions
(which means you're COMPLETELY STUPID . We're not
against Bush because he's white, rich, Republican, or
from Texas. We're against him because he cuts Veteran
Benefits while sending people to war. We're against
him because his Vice President's company is getting
no-bid contracts. We're against him because he
eliminated the Clean Air/Water Act, and loosened
pollution controls so his energy buddies can ruin our
land/water/air. We're against him because his All
Children Left Behind Act is the single worst piece of
educational reform ever thought up in history. We're
against him because they fire those who disagree with
them, or tell the truth in public. We're against him
because Bush/Cheney/Rice refuse to testify to the full
9/11 comission, and refuse to testify in public
(Clinton/Gore/Berger did, why can't you?) We're
against him because James Baker III (Bush I and II
lackey) represented the Saudis AGAINST American
lawsuits after 9/11. We're against him because NOW
the world REALLY HATES US. We went from being the
world's sympathetic favorite after 9/11 to being it's
pariah. When the rest of the world says don't invade,
shouldn't we maybe stop and listen? No, cowboy Up!
Bring 'em on! Real diplomatic. The first 2 leaders
to visit Bush after 9/11 were Jacque Chirac, and
Gehrard Schroder. Before Blair. They weren't against
us. Bush just aliented them. So if this is the
Uniter not a Divider you want, you got what you
deserve. For the rest of you, please help me get rid
of him in November.

by the way, in the traditional fashion of old men
sending young boys to die, you should know this.

George W. Bush
Tom Delay
Bill Frist
Sean Hannity
Michael Savage
Rush Limbaugh

...all somehow got a defferral to miss Vietnam.
Granted, so did Howard Dean (not my fav anyway), but
he's against the war right now. The rest of those
guys are screaming for it, and more to come. I guess
missing Vietnam means you have to get into politics,
kinda funny. (I have no problem with ANY draft
dodgers, I think it's a horrible system. My problem
is when those men become Hawks, and send others
without their fortunate political connections to die).

in a totally unrelated sidenote: Some of you are
state employees, most of us are in school or have
school age friends/kids, we all rely on city/county
services police/fire/ambulance, etc. With the cost of
Bush's Tax Cuts for the Rich, he could have bailed out
EVERY SINGLE STATE debt, in its' entirety. Think
about that. His tax cuts have obviously not
stimulated the economy, they were very specific in
their benefit, and our state/county/city
infrastructure is getting decimated. Even with
California/New York size debt, he could have given it
all back, and we would have been reset to zero.
Priorities, people.........

Reborn79
04-12-2004, 10:13 AM
Many good points. Whoever wrote that, well put.


Now, prepare to be flamed. :D

LethalOnGuitarZ
04-12-2004, 10:30 AM
This should be a sticky to remind us all how much of a pr*ck Bush is.

I only pray to God that he gets voted out in the upcoming elections.

Anyone for George W. Bush, ought to be shot. :)

(btw, you should change the thread title cos many people won't take it seriously at first glance)

Debaser
04-12-2004, 10:36 AM
Did you really need to be so graphic with the title thread?

Reborn79
04-12-2004, 10:39 AM
Originally posted by Debaser
Did you really need to be so graphic with the title thread?

I personally see it as a metaphor for this administration's treatment of the citizens of this country (and the world).





















But yes, the title is gross as hell and will only inflame the Bush supporters more (which isn't hard to do).

:D

Debaser
04-12-2004, 10:40 AM
Originally posted by ltll


President George W. Bush has NOT ATTENDED A SINGLE
funeral for any personnel killed in Iraq.



Don't you think that if he attends one funeral, that he will need to attend them all? After reading this statement I have chosen not to read your other biased views. Good day.

Reborn79
04-12-2004, 10:41 AM
Originally posted by Debaser
Don't you think that if he attends one funeral, that he will need to attend them all? After reading this statement I have chosen not to read your other biased views. Good day.

That's a pity then, as he made some good points and arguments.

Debaser
04-12-2004, 10:49 AM
Originally posted by Reborn79
That's a pity then, as he made some good points and arguments.

I read it and the arguments have been beaten to death. You don't need to convince me of the US's hypocritical foreign policy.

Ak47
04-12-2004, 02:19 PM
double post

Ak47
04-12-2004, 02:19 PM
I think we should have two stickies, one anti-kerry, one anti-bush, no flaming or anything, all you can post is legitiment arguements and articles, and if any successive flaming starts, they can just be closed. But it would be good to just be able to put all of these awesome articles in just one place, so it would be easy to refer to them in other threads.

ltll
04-12-2004, 02:48 PM
Originally posted by Ak47
I think we should have two stickies, one anti-kerry, one anti-bush, no flaming or anything, all you can post is legitiment arguements and articles, and if any successive flaming starts, they can just be closed. But it would be good to just be able to put all of these awesome articles in just one place, so it would be easy to refer to them in other threads.


bump

dave22
04-12-2004, 03:28 PM
Once again some of you parasite liberals are so full of ****, WE DIDN'T PUT SADDAM IN POWER!!!!!! READ SOME HISTORY ON HOW HE CAME TO POWER!!!!!! You'll find out we had nothing to do with it, so STFU already. Next thing you'll be saying is that we put Kim Jung in power, or the Mullahs in power.

LethalOnGuitarZ
04-12-2004, 03:35 PM
Originally posted by dave22
Once again some of you parasite liberals are so full of ****, WE DIDN'T PUT SADDAM IN POWER!!!!!! READ SOME HISTORY ON HOW HE CAME TO POWER!!!!!! You'll find out we had nothing to do with it, so STFU already. Next thing you'll be saying is that we put Kim Jung in power, or the Mullahs in power.
Yeah but he never said America put Saddam in power. He said they supported him, during the war against the Iranians, which is correct.

dave22
04-12-2004, 03:50 PM
Originally posted by LethalOnGuitarZ
Yeah but he never said America put Saddam in power. He said they supported him, during the war against the Iranians, which is correct.
As with most
horrible dictators, rebel leaders, the U.S. put Saddam
in power. Go look it up. You don't have to believe
me. He was the leader of the Ba'ath Party, and we
needed him to fight the EVIL IRANIANS.

FYI we also supplied Iran with weapons. Also we only supplied Saddam with 1% of his weapons, look at the Russians, and the rest of Europe, they supplied him with most of his weapons. It was France that sold him a nuclear reactor, but a liberal would never post such a thing, because it doesn't put down the US.

We wanted neither side to win, nor lose and that was what happened, at the end of the Iraq-Iran war both countries were in horrible shape, mission accomplished.

JonZ
04-13-2004, 07:32 AM
And it amazing me how many americans think hes a swell guy.

If he gets reelected then the people of this country will be getting what they deserve.

Personally Im ready to become a Mexican of Novia Scotian.

I just read this.........


THE UN VOTING RECORDS OF ARABIC AND ISLAMIC ?FRIENDS? OF THE USA
VNS EXCLUSIVE - Editorial by John Doyel Shamley
11 April 2004

I have often stated that one of the best things the USA could do is to completely withdraw from the United Nations (UN). Not only our membership, but our funding.
The USA should also completely stop all foreign aid and bring our troops home from around the world. It is hard to justify a national debt and deficit larger than almost every countries national yearly budgets, and still be giving away our fiat money to other countries.
The New World Order, needs the UN among other socialist conspiratorial agencies to succeed and without the support or sanction of the USA, they would lose.
An abbreviated list of some of the agencies that are pushing the USA down the slippery slope towards the New World Order are:
The United States State Department; The C.I.A.; The F.B.I; The IRS; The Atomic Energy Commission;
The Council on Foreign Relations; The Trilateral Commission;
The various secret societies; The Mystery Schools;
The Republican Political Party; The Democratic Political Party;
The International Monetary Fund; The World Bank; The European Economic Union;
The North American Free Trade Agreement;
The General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs;
The Fabian Societies; The Freemasons; Green peace; The Sierra Club;
Agreements such as the International Biosphere Treaty;
Buffer zones in our wilderness to keep people from being self sufficient;
etc.,etc.,etc.
For more information on these and many other socialists, subversive organizations, see the links on the left of the web site. We are the number one source for research on the enemies of our Constitutional Republic and their activities.God save the republic!!!!Below are the actual voting records of various Arabic/Islamic States which are recorded in both the US State Department and United Nations records
Kuwait votes against the United States 67% of the time.
Qatar votes against the United States 67% of the time.
Morocco votes against the United States 70% of the time.
United Arab Emirates votes against the US.. 70% of the time.
Jordan votes against the United States 71% of the time.
Tunisia votes against the United States 71% of the time.
Saudi Arabia votes against the United States 73% of the time.
Yemen votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Algeria votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Oman votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Sudan votes against the United States 75% of the time.
Pakistan votes against the United States 75% of the time.
Libya votes against the United States 76% of the time.
Egypt votes against the United States 79% of the time.
Lebanon votes against the United States 80% of the time.
India votes against the United States 81% of the time.
Syria votes against the United States 84% of the time.
Mauritania votes against the United States 87% of! the time.
US Foreign Aid to those that hate us:
Egypt, for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States, still receives $2 billion annually in US Foreign Aid.
Jordan votes 71% against the United States and receives $192,814,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
Pakistan votes 75% against the United States receives $6,721,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
India votes 81% against the United States receives $143,699,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
It is time to get out of the UN and give the tax savings back to the American workers who are having to skimp and sacrifice to pay the taxes.
Pass it along. Everyone needs to know this. Might even mention it to your congressman, who knows it anyway...what a disgrace...no wonder the world has no respect for us!

illriginal
04-13-2004, 07:42 AM
Originally posted by Ak47
I think we should have two stickies, one anti-kerry, one anti-bush, no flaming or anything, all you can post is legitiment arguements and articles, and if any successive flaming starts, they can just be closed. But it would be good to just be able to put all of these awesome articles in just one place, so it would be easy to refer to them in other threads.

agreed!

illriginal
04-13-2004, 07:52 AM
Originally posted by JonZ
And it amazing me how many americans think hes a swell guy.

If he gets reelected then the people of this country will be getting what they deserve.

Personally Im ready to become a Mexican of Novia Scotian.

I just read this.........


THE UN VOTING RECORDS OF ARABIC AND ISLAMIC FRIENDS? OF THE USA
VNS EXCLUSIVE - Editorial by John Doyel Shamley
11 April 2004

I have often stated that one of the best things the USA could do is to completely withdraw from the United Nations (UN). Not only our membership, but our funding.
The USA should also completely stop all foreign aid and bring our troops home from around the world. It is hard to justify a national debt and deficit larger than almost every countries national yearly budgets, and still be giving away our fiat money to other countries.
The New World Order, needs the UN among other socialist conspiratorial agencies to succeed and without the support or sanction of the USA, they would lose.
An abbreviated list of some of the agencies that are pushing the USA down the slippery slope towards the New World Order are:
The United States State Department; The C.I.A.; The F.B.I; The IRS; The Atomic Energy Commission;
The Council on Foreign Relations; The Trilateral Commission;
The various secret societies; The Mystery Schools;
The Republican Political Party; The Democratic Political Party;
The International Monetary Fund; The World Bank; The European Economic Union;
The North American Free Trade Agreement;
The General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs;
The Fabian Societies; The Freemasons; Green peace; The Sierra Club;
Agreements such as the International Biosphere Treaty;
Buffer zones in our wilderness to keep people from being self sufficient;
etc.,etc.,etc.
For more information on these and many other socialists, subversive organizations, see the links on the left of the web site. We are the number one source for research on the enemies of our Constitutional Republic and their activities.God save the republic!!!!Below are the actual voting records of various Arabic/Islamic States which are recorded in both the US State Department and United Nations records
Kuwait votes against the United States 67% of the time.
Qatar votes against the United States 67% of the time.
Morocco votes against the United States 70% of the time.
United Arab Emirates votes against the US.. 70% of the time.
Jordan votes against the United States 71% of the time.
Tunisia votes against the United States 71% of the time.
Saudi Arabia votes against the United States 73% of the time.
Yemen votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Algeria votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Oman votes against the United States 74% of the time.
Sudan votes against the United States 75% of the time.
Pakistan votes against the United States 75% of the time.
Libya votes against the United States 76% of the time.
Egypt votes against the United States 79% of the time.
Lebanon votes against the United States 80% of the time.
India votes against the United States 81% of the time.
Syria votes against the United States 84% of the time.
Mauritania votes against the United States 87% of! the time.
US Foreign Aid to those that hate us:
Egypt, for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States, still receives $2 billion annually in US Foreign Aid.
Jordan votes 71% against the United States and receives $192,814,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
Pakistan votes 75% against the United States receives $6,721,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
India votes 81% against the United States receives $143,699,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.
It is time to get out of the UN and give the tax savings back to the American workers who are having to skimp and sacrifice to pay the taxes.
Pass it along. Everyone needs to know this. Might even mention it to your congressman, who knows it anyway...what a disgrace...no wonder the world has no respect for us!

The ones that in bold please show your source... also do you think that if they all voted against us... we'd still be connected with them? The NWO is going to be started here in the U.S. to begin with... so I believe that U.S. wouldnt dare to break off the U.N. which sucks cuz Im not planning on putting any chips or marks on my body just cuz the gov. said so. I also do believe we should just say... **** you all and not help no one and work on our own country before any others. This just sounds like misinformation to make democrats/republicans and george bush look horrible. I'd much rather see it from a reliable source that doesn't go against "any" parties.
Also about the buffer zones.. what do you much rather destroy our wilderness to make more room for living space? I'd much rather breathe air than have more people move into new locations where there used to be a wilderness. Leave buffer zones out of it.

illriginal
04-13-2004, 08:11 AM
You know... the main reason why I like Bush is only "only" because he's working on terrorism... why be a punk bitch and let terrorist come to our land and destroy it? I bet if this happened to Japan they'd be making a huge deal over it and running all over Iran/Iraq trying to find the main man. As soon as Bush find Bin Laden... I'll be satisfied with his work and then he can lose the election, but untill they find Bin... I'm all the way for Bush and not some pussy that's going to let terrorist hurt our people in our own land. If you blame Bush for 9/11 and for starting a "war" on terrorist then you're just a bitch and dont belong in the states since you dont even have the pride to stand up for your land. So please if you're scared of a lil death to fix a problem please get the **** out of my country.

Jcfreak_02
04-13-2004, 02:07 PM
Originally posted by Ak47
I think we should have two stickies, one anti-kerry, one anti-bush, no flaming or anything, all you can post is legitiment arguements and articles, and if any successive flaming starts, they can just be closed. But it would be good to just be able to put all of these awesome articles in just one place, so it would be easy to refer to them in other threads. I could agree with that much if we must give political stickies.

deerdiary
01-31-2014, 04:55 PM
so much truth ITT.

Bushmaster
01-31-2014, 05:06 PM
Strong ten year bump

Btw, he's gone now you know. New guy now... been there for five years actually.