PDA

View Full Version : SuperDrol vs. Pheraplex?



kickitupanotch
03-14-2007, 11:15 AM
Which, in your opinion, is better? I've noticed that there are still plenty of Pheraplex clones floating around that are priced normally... where as I've seen the original superdrol listed for as much as OVER $100 for a 60cap bottle.

Is the SD really that amazing and coveted?

I've done the pheraplex in the past and saw GREAT gains along with a lot of water bloat. How would SuperDrol stand in terms of gains and effectivness?

Liquid_diet
03-14-2007, 11:21 AM
Threre's also some SD clones floating around for normal price as well....

Bloute
03-14-2007, 11:27 AM
Also, there is Havoc floating around !

kickitupanotch
03-14-2007, 11:43 AM
Then why is the original SD so pricey aside from scarcity?

have any of you run both that can provide some feedback? I actually have both... don't know which one i want to use.

Chris95
03-14-2007, 12:00 PM
LOL. Bloute...shhhhh!!


Also, there is Havoc floating around !

SPACECLOWN
03-14-2007, 12:22 PM
Then why is the original SD so pricey aside from scarcity?

have any of you run both that can provide some feedback? I actually have both... don't know which one i want to use.

Reason the original is so pricey is because morons will pay it. Another option since you have PH experience is to run PP bridged to SD.

kickitupanotch
03-14-2007, 12:30 PM
Give me a sample cycle?

I've always been told not to bridge or stack methylated compounds. I've also been told not to let methylated cycles last longer than 6 weeks.

Does sd come with the same water bloat as pheraplex?

kickitupanotch
03-14-2007, 12:31 PM
Also, there is Havoc floating around !
No thanks, I want to work for my gains ;)

Steve0178
03-14-2007, 01:12 PM
Do a search for the superdrol compuond and you will find many clones for 1/4 the price.

skelooth
03-14-2007, 02:00 PM
I would like to know too out of curiousity (plex vs sd), because the pheraplex bloated me up like a balloon when I took it so long ago. Is the SD "wet" as well? More? Less?

aslan
03-14-2007, 02:17 PM
No thanks, I want to work for my gains ;)

who says you dont have to work for your gains on havoc?

Bloute
03-14-2007, 02:20 PM
Give me a sample cycle?

I've always been told not to bridge or stack methylated compounds. I've also been told not to let methylated cycles last longer than 6 weeks.

Does sd come with the same water bloat as pheraplex?

No SD isnt a wet compound. I would not recommend to stack two methyls and finally over 6 weeks for a methyl is only for really advanced users !

bongd
03-14-2007, 02:31 PM
The sides from SD can get pretty rough. With compounds like Epistane/Havoc out there, I wouldn't mess with SD other than to curb the curiosity.

kickitupanotch
03-14-2007, 02:33 PM
who says you dont have to work for your gains on havoc?
sense of humor does?

Bloute
03-14-2007, 02:37 PM
The sides from SD can get pretty rough. With compounds like Epistane/Havoc out there, I wouldn't mess with SD other than to curb the curiosity.

^^^

This guy is bright I wonder where he learned all this stuff ! :D

adam@ahlonline.
03-14-2007, 02:56 PM
I found the sides rougher on SD than PP...

Then again the gains can be explosive! ;)

P.S. Go with a clone....

This will make good reading:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=826054&highlight=ProMagnon-25

SPACECLOWN
03-14-2007, 03:56 PM
Here is a sample cycle bridged over 45 days.
Days 1-5 PP15mg
Days 6-25 PP 30mg
Days 26-30 PP 30mg/SD 10mg
Days 30-45 SD 20mg

or

W1:PP-15mg
W2:PP-30mg
WK3:PP-30mg
WK4:PP-15mg/SD-10mg
WK5:SD-20mg
WK6:SD-20mg

Many many many people have done 6 week cycles and specifically these 2 compounds. This is nothing new. Yes with anything there is more risk extending the cycle. As for 2 methyls I do agree they should not be stacked at full dosage but looking at the way its laid out you can see its not as bad. Basically we say not to stack 2 methyls so someone doesnt run 30mg PP and 20mg of SD or simlar and especially a full cycle.

I agree alternatives look promising for some new PH products like Epistane/Havoc/Humagro etc. but I personally choose to wait for more feedback before I will try them. So far they do sound very appealing but you can find many many logs and opinion on PP, SD.

As for wet/dry etc. From my research PP is definately a wet PH and SD is more dry yet definately carrys sides so it is important to understand these sides and how to combat them as much as possible.

Steve0178
03-14-2007, 06:13 PM
Here is a sample cycle bridged over 45 days.
Days 1-5 PP15mg
Days 6-25 PP 30mg
Days 26-30 PP 30mg/SD 10mg
Days 30-45 SD 20mg

or

W1:PP-15mg
W2:PP-30mg
WK3:PP-30mg
WK4:PP-15mg/SD-10mg
WK5:SD-20mg
WK6:SD-20mg

Many many many people have done 6 week cycles and specifically these 2 compounds. This is nothing new. Yes with anything there is more risk extending the cycle. As for 2 methyls I do agree they should not be stacked at full dosage but looking at the way its laid out you can see its not as bad. Basically we say not to stack 2 methyls so someone doesnt run 30mg PP and 20mg of SD or simlar and especially a full cycle.

I agree alternatives look promising for some new PH products like Epistane/Havoc/Humagro etc. but I personally choose to wait for more feedback before I will try them. So far they do sound very appealing but you can find many many logs and opinion on PP, SD.

As for wet/dry etc. From my research PP is definately a wet PH and SD is more dry yet definately carrys sides so it is important to understand these sides and how to combat them as much as possible.



Great post! Although i must say havoc is pretty good. Gains are nice and dry...the only thing i dont like is the fact that it irritates joints considerably.