PDA

View Full Version : LGBT agenda takes next step (Canada fails again edition)



celltechbrahz
06-09-2017, 06:44 AM
Canada, a country known for its apparent propensity toward cuckery, has now reached a new high point! Well known for its hate speech legislation, Canada decided not to be left behind, and has now embarked on accepting a new policy even Misc libs will be hard-pressed to defend:


Canada’s New Law Lets Government Take Children Away If Parents Don’t Accept Their Gender Identity.”

https://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2017/06/06/draft-n2337114?amp=true

Discuss!

BFast55
06-09-2017, 06:46 AM
Parents can now lose their chirren because they refuse to pump steroids into their 5 year old daughter. My guess is that this will now be used as a weapon in divorce custody battles as well.

Big win for liberalism.

Dave22reborn
06-09-2017, 06:47 AM
Wow...nothing like the power of the almighty state.

jamesovercome
06-09-2017, 06:52 AM
The Canadian government considers using the wrong pronouns tantamount to abuse and harassment. This is the next logical step in their stupidity.

TimDF
06-09-2017, 07:04 AM
Absolutely disgusting. People still worried about Muslims living next door to them when you got these fuking loonies.

Sleev-les
06-09-2017, 07:07 AM
Does anyone have popcorn I can have? I have run out while watching the never ending slapstick comedy called "World of Cucks"...... I need my popcorn during my movie experience. I mean it is a movie right? This can't be real life!

Canadian2point0
06-09-2017, 07:07 AM
Canada’s New Law Lets Government Take Children Away If Parents Don’t Accept Their Gender Identity.”

Lol, as this is some scary chit happening.....that quote is completely wrong.

Singularity7
06-09-2017, 07:09 AM
I remember posters saying c-16 was just fear mongering nothing to worry about...

Mumra
06-09-2017, 07:10 AM
give a girl drugs because she wants to be a boy = great idea.

let a man take the same drugs so he can smash more and look better = Felony +10 years.

our society is screwed.

wickedman
06-09-2017, 07:20 AM
I honestly have zero care for what sexual identity people are (if you looked at 1/2 the search histories of the average person you'd find much more bizarre stuff going on), but I really hate when they involve children in this agenda. You should be stripped of parenting rights if you push this stuff on kids before they are adults, not the other way around.

BFast55
06-09-2017, 07:26 AM
I honestly have zero care for what sexual identity people are (if you looked at 1/2 the search histories of the average person you'd find much more bizarre stuff going on), but I really hate when they involve children in this agenda. You should be stripped of parenting rights if you push this stuff on kids before they are adults, not the other way around.
The act of parents transitioning their young children will be looked back upon as one of the worst things done in the early 21st century. Back in my day, terrible moms forced their tomboy daughters into dresses and onto the pageant stage. Now they can turn their son into the daughter that they always wanted. Sick.

celltechbrahz
06-09-2017, 07:28 AM
I honestly have zero care for what sexual identity people are (if you looked at 1/2 the search histories of the average person you'd find much more bizarre stuff going on), but I really hate when they involve children in this agenda. You should be stripped of parenting rights if you push this stuff on kids before they are adults, not the other way around.

It's a great way to eliminate parental rights (forced compliance) and expand the state's role in the life of all citizens from beginning to end, which is the ultimate goal as we are living in a synthesis between 1984 thought control and Brave New World control via entertainment/pleasure/intoxication.

"Abuse" is redefined to a point where simply deciding not to pretend that a male who cuts off some bodyparts and takes exogenous estrogen becomes a female (an obvious biological untruth) is a form of "abuse," and therefore punishable by law.


The Minister of Children and Youth Services, Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill, said earlier this year that a parent’s failure to recognize and support a child’s gender self-identification is a form of child abuse, and a child in these circumstances should be removed from the situation and placed into protection.

“I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” Coteau said. “If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”

Insanity.

ssg10587
06-09-2017, 07:29 AM
give a girl drugs because she wants to be a boy = great idea.

let a man take the same drugs so he can smash more and look better = Felony +10 years.

our society is screwed.

lmao this. Let alone all its use in every single on of our sports.

"I want amazing athletes!!!!!.....but performance enhancers are wrong!"

AlwaysFocus
06-09-2017, 07:31 AM
How do we fix this. Help. :(

Canadian2point0
06-09-2017, 07:38 AM
How do we fix this. Help. :(You can't. It's to late for us, as most Canadians didn't give a chit in the past about Ontario's Childrens Aid Society's overreach. People were warned.

Next step : Make home schooling illegal, and they'll have complete oversight on how your kids are raised. Remember, they're "co-parenting."

EvanStroud
06-09-2017, 07:40 AM
Inb4 "Canada far superior to America"

EDIT: Too late, every Canadian and 95% of liberals beat me to it

sooby
06-09-2017, 07:50 AM
Andrew Scheer 2019

7rmr
06-09-2017, 07:55 AM
Skimmed the act. Didn't see the part referred to in the OP.

Can you please quote the relevant section of the legislation

arn710
06-09-2017, 08:01 AM
I remember when we all graduated kindergarten and got to select our gender

Such a fun day

Canadian2point0
06-09-2017, 08:01 AM
Andrew Scheer 2019https://www.therebel.media/ezra_levant_june_7_2017

gixxer0.6g
06-09-2017, 08:02 AM
RIP Canada. You were such a beautiful country.

Mumra
06-09-2017, 08:17 AM
Skimmed the act. Didn't see the part referred to in the OP.

Can you please quote the relevant section of the legislation
do your own homework liberal or do you want the gov't to do that for you too?

JUSA
06-09-2017, 08:19 AM
Absolutely disgusting. People still worried about Muslims living next door to them when you got these fuking loonies. Truth. While most Muslims are too conservative leaning with their views on gays and women, even with the violent extremists who are animals, they're not nearly the threat to Western civilization that leftist lunatics are. As bad as I might think it is that a good chunk of Muslims think homosexuality should be a crime, generally speaking they just hold abhorrent opinions. These liberals hold equally abhorrent views and also have the power to implement their insanity.

I don't mean we need to quash the rights of gays or women or anything, I just mean that the extreme level the left takes "gay rights", to the point of ripping apart families over nothing-burgers, is a much more direct long-term threat to destroying society than Islam.

engj
06-09-2017, 08:21 AM
RIP Canada. You were such a beautiful country.


This act is specific to Ontario, the province with an SJW lesbian premier. The one who had a 63yo convicted with child porn develop their sex ed curriculum.

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/former-ontario-education-deputy-minister-pleads-guilty-to-three-child-porn-charges


In Alberta they elected a even further left government, first order of business was rainbow crosswalks and gender neutral bathrooms in elementary schools.

They released a 'Guidelines for best practices'

https://education.alberta.ca/media/1626737/91383-attachment-1-guidelines-final.pdf


Stuff like

"Self-identification is the sole measure of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression"


Faculty are encouraged to discuss the meaning and implications of this with the student without the parents, and I quote:

"Wherever possible, before contacting the parents or other adults involved in the care (such as social workers or caregivers) of a student who is trans or gender-diverse, consult with the student to determine an appropriate way to reference the student’s gender identity, gender expression, name and related pronouns."

If your neighbors 14yo son Eddy gets a boner and decides he wants in the girls change room, then "Self-identification is the sole measure of an individual’s sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression".


Cultural marxism is real. Thankfully we still have a separate school system here that ignores all this bullchit (for now).



How do we fix this. Help. :(


Educate yourself and sort out your opinions on the matter.

Then when someone tries to push you further than feel you should go, push back.

Roldz
06-09-2017, 08:22 AM
http://i.imgur.com/iQujLLA.jpg

JUGGERNAUT1333
06-09-2017, 08:23 AM
This cannot be real life.

celltechbrahz
06-09-2017, 08:24 AM
Skimmed the act. Didn't see the part referred to in the OP.

Can you please quote the relevant section of the legislation

It legislates gender identity/expression as a "best interests" consideration which, when coupled with the above section (can't paste, on cellphone), could be used in considering emotional/mental distress or depression issues that constitute removal on the basis of "an act or failure to act" on behalf of the parents.

That's just one take based off a quick skim. The bill's introducer has stated that rejecting one's delusion to become trans should be considered "abuse," so I am not sure which angle it would take and it would probably be left to the courts to decide, which undoubtedly in today's world would result in the permissability of this type of removal -- especially in Canada where you can't even question gay marriage in a homeschooling setting.

American Psycho
06-09-2017, 08:28 AM
How do we fix this. Help. :(

TI05gOszgGE

https://youtu.be/TI05gOszgGE

7rmr
06-09-2017, 08:28 AM
It legislates gender identity/expression as a "best interests" consideration which, when coupled with the above section (can't paste, on cellphone), could be used in considering emotional/mental distress or depression issues that constitute removal on the basis of "an act or failure to act" on behalf of the parents.

That's just one take based off a quick skim. The bill's introducer has stated that rejecting one's delusion to become trans should be considered "abuse," so I am not sure which angle it would take and it would probably be left to the courts to decide, which undoubtedly in today's world would result in the permissability of this type of removal -- especially in Canada where you can't even question gay marriage in a homeschooling setting.

The best interest appears to be in reference to determining where a child would be placed once they are in the custody of the state.

There doesn't appreciate to be anything in the act that gives the government the right to remove a child from a parents home because they don't respect their gender identity .

Again, I could be wrong, but could someone please post that section of the legislation incase I missed it.

sooby
06-09-2017, 08:30 AM
https://www.therebel.media/ezra_levant_june_7_2017

o damn did not know that, reminds me of something the left would pull

I guess we're cucked no matter what lmao

is there a reason why he was in favour of the paris agreement?

American Psycho
06-09-2017, 08:37 AM
I guess we're cucked no matter what lmao

because ppl allow it and for no other reason.

Our parents allowed this chit. It needs to be different with our own politicians ;)

celltechbrahz
06-09-2017, 08:42 AM
The best interest appears to be in reference to determining where a child would be placed once they are in the custody of the state.

There doesn't appreciate to be anything in the act that gives the government the right to remove a child from a parents home because they don't respect their gender identity .

Again, I could be wrong, but could someone please post that section of the legislation incase I missed it.

One interpretation:


One thing that Bill 89 does, it signals a shift towards a greater readiness for Children’s Aid Societies to intervene. So the current law says, with regard to Children’s Aid Societies, that they should always take the “least disruptive course of action” that’s available to them. What Bill 89 does is it adds something to that. So it keeps the “least disruptive court of action” phrase, but then adds “including the provision of prevention services.” And you know, we never have language added for no reason. The courts will always see a purpose in the Legislature adding language, and this, to me, implies that Children’s Aid Society intervention should not be presumed to be more disruptive than non-intervention. And intervention is (considered) necessary for a number of reasons in this law. A child may be in need of protection – Children’s Aid Society intervention – if the child is suffering mental or emotional harm, or is at risk of mental or emotional harm, and if parents are not providing treatment or access to proper treatment for a child who’s considered to be suffering from that kind of emotional harm. Then Children’s Aid Societies are supposed to investigate and possibly intervene.

And so you can imagine a situation where, say, a child’s teacher suspects that a child is gender questioning or something and they’re not being supported in that. The teacher (would) actually have a duty to report certain things to a Children’s Aid Society who would look into it further. So these things (taken together with some of the things that are added like gender identity) kind of signal that intervening may not be considered more disruptive than not intervening. We may be seeing a shift towards essentially enforcing gender ideology in families.

https://arpacanada.ca/lighthouse-news/ontario-bill89/#feature

I'm sure you know that a bill isn't limited by what it says but by what it can be argued to support. Again you'd have to defer to the courts for interpretation, but a topic that hot is almost a guarantee of a national SJW campaign and a virtue signalling ruling which would set a pretty bad precedent.

7rmr
06-09-2017, 08:49 AM
One interpretation:



https://arpacanada.ca/lighthouse-news/ontario-bill89/#feature

I'm sure you know that a bill isn't limited by what it says but by what it can be argued to support. Again you'd have to defer to the courts for interpretation, but a topic that hot is almost a guarantee of a national SJW campaign and a virtue signalling ruling which would set a pretty bad precedent.

Ok, so again, the wording you are concerned with is the addition of "including the provision of prevention services" a fairly neutral phrase.

And somehow, you have now turned that into a thread on how this legislation will lead to the government taking children away from parents if they don't respect their gender identity .

Sorry, it's pretty clear this bill doesn't do what you're saying it does in the OP

engj
06-09-2017, 08:53 AM
One interpretation:



https://arpacanada.ca/lighthouse-news/ontario-bill89/#feature

I'm sure you know that a bill isn't limited by what it says but by what it can be argued to support. Again you'd have to defer to the courts for interpretation, but a topic that hot is almost a guarantee of a national SJW campaign and a virtue signalling ruling which would set a pretty bad precedent.


Its the way these causes are advanced in Canada.

Taken to its extreme?

First its awareness
then its 'best practices'
then its 'policy statements'
then its 'policy guidelines'
then its an intentionally vaguely worded bill untested by law <---- you are here
then its an over-reach by government agency to test the law <---- this is your last chance to push back
then its legally tested precedent

At that point the government has control. The government has a media wing (CBC) who will defend every action and call it a victory for social justice, and it would take an enormous effort to overturn it.

monty097
06-09-2017, 08:59 AM
Wow, this country gets more embarrassing every fuking day.

Really hope Cuckeau gets voted out next election, this is past the point of ridiculous.

bodymovesyou
06-09-2017, 09:01 AM
Canadian bro checking in

Liberals not even once.... they need to go.

superiorlogic
06-09-2017, 09:03 AM
I hate this world

LugosiNineOne
06-09-2017, 09:10 AM
Nice canada, but you are still only going to get #3 at best behind Germany and Sweden for biggest SJW libtards on earth.

Keep it up though, I believe in you.

IlChosenOne
06-09-2017, 09:10 AM
We need a wall on the northern border too

US_Ranger
06-09-2017, 10:27 AM
Its the way these causes are advanced in Canada.

Taken to its extreme?

First its awareness
then its 'best practices'
then its 'policy statements'
then its 'policy guidelines'
then its an intentionally vaguely worded bill untested by law <---- you are here
then its an over-reach by government agency to test the law <---- this is your last chance to push back
then its legally tested precedent

At that point the government has control. The government has a media wing (CBC) who will defend every action and call it a victory for social justice, and it would take an enormous effort to overturn it.

The best way to boil a frog is slowly. Sounds like Canada has it down.

engj
06-09-2017, 10:41 AM
The best way to boil a frog is slowly. Sounds like Canada has it down.

Started with the French intellectual movement in the 70's after the reality of WW2 started to fade, and its pushed anywhere where people are comfortable and anesthetized enough to not care...most of western democracy at this point. Canadians for the most part are very comfortable and have a high quality of life so they tend to go with the flow.

I didnt start thinking deeply on it until I had kids TBH.

I have hope, I think Brexit and Trump are the first major push-backs.




Anyone who takes this as me being anti-lgbt can gtfo, I am absolutely not. I am 100% for individual and community responsibility, keeping power and decision making as local as possible.

Government is there to provide defense and major services, not tell you how to think.

swoleyo
06-09-2017, 11:00 AM
Absolutely disgusting. People still worried about Muslims living next door to them when you got these fuking loonies.

I'm starting to like Muslims more then liberals. I'm not even kidding, I'd rather have a conservative Muslim couple living next door then two lesbian liberals pumping female hormones into there son.

Mumra
06-09-2017, 11:04 AM
I'm starting to like Muslims more then liberals. I'm not even kidding, I'd rather have a conservative Muslim couple living next door then two lesbian liberals pumping female hormones into there son.
starting? I'd take just about anyone else next door than a liberal. I'd probably come home one day to them trying to tell my GF that she's not really a female and it's all in her head or trying to get my dog(female) to lift her like like a dude.

Nihiliste
06-09-2017, 11:06 AM
Absolutely disgusting. People still worried about Muslims living next door to them when you got these fuking loonies.

I would take Muslims over these psycho hyper progressive libs any day.

But I'd rather have a 1940s-50s esque society with neither demographic pushing their agenda.

Nihiliste
06-09-2017, 11:07 AM
starting? I'd take just about anyone else next door than a liberal. I'd probably come home one day to them trying to tell my GF that she's not really a female and it's all in her head or trying to get my dog(female) to lift her like like a dude.

Postmodernists must be destroyed.

Reggi00
06-09-2017, 11:20 AM
Everyone is laughing at Canada but no one bats an eye when Hollywood is turning into Trannywood that could negatively influence kids. They will grow up finding them attractive or wanting to become one due to a period of high consumption of mass media and the Trannywood.

InstantLoser
06-09-2017, 11:25 AM
The best interest appears to be in reference to determining where a child would be placed once they are in the custody of the state.

There doesn't appreciate to be anything in the act that gives the government the right to remove a child from a parents home because they don't respect their gender identity .

Again, I could be wrong, but could someone please post that section of the legislation incase I missed it.

You're wrong. The act states that not respecting gender expression can be considered abuse, and a child being abused can be taken away by the state and placed into either foster care, or a state run facility who will continue to allow that child to "transition" (taxpayer funded, no doubt).

snarfbot
06-09-2017, 11:35 AM
http://i.imgur.com/uEWbzvg.gif

the future is very strange

ZenBowman
06-09-2017, 11:51 AM
Absolute lunatics.

This is why there is really no option for me but to vote straight-ticket Republican from now on. Yes, the GOP is utterly stupid, but anything is better than the modern left.

Completely serious, I would much rather live in a moderate/conservative state governed by Sharia than many leftist utopias.

Mumra
06-09-2017, 12:02 PM
Absolute lunatics.

This is why there is really no option for me but to vote straight-ticket Republican from now on. Yes, the GOP is utterly stupid, but anything is better than the modern left.

Completely serious, I would much rather live in a moderate/conservative state governed by Sharia than many leftist utopias.
at lest the media would hold Reps accountable. they just give a pass to and cover for Dems.

wickedman
06-09-2017, 12:06 PM
I'm starting to like Muslims more then liberals. I'm not even kidding, I'd rather have a conservative Muslim couple living next door then two lesbian liberals pumping female hormones into there son.


I would take Muslims over these psycho hyper progressive libs any day.

But I'd rather have a 1940s-50s esque society with neither demographic pushing their agenda.


Absolute lunatics.

This is why there is really no option for me but to vote straight-ticket Republican from now on. Yes, the GOP is utterly stupid, but anything is better than the modern left.

Completely serious, I would much rather live in a moderate/conservative state governed by Sharia than many leftist utopias.

I much prefer the Islam way of life to the lefty way of life - it's just a matter of we have no means of getting rid of our lefty scum since they are technically Americans, whereas not letting new refugees in is as simple as... not letting them in.

SnowEh
06-09-2017, 12:07 PM
This would only apply to white families. They would not implement this on any minority such as a muslim or black family

cashinout
06-09-2017, 12:10 PM
This would only apply to white families. They would not implement this on any minority such as a muslim or black family

probably because only white families even believe in gender identity nonsense

SnowEh
06-09-2017, 12:16 PM
probably because only white families even believe in gender identity nonsense

Yup. I can bet there is a high correlation between being far left and having gender confused children. Although let's be honest the kids aren't having gender idenity issues, the parents are just softly forcing them to change.
Doesn't mean there wouldn't be gender confused children in a muslim family or black christian family. But at least it would be GENUINE confusion, not something forced upon them.

nbxcgn
06-09-2017, 03:36 PM
would rather live in saudi arabia than canada

AlwaysFocus
06-09-2017, 04:40 PM
Started with the French intellectual movement in the 70's after the reality of WW2 started to fade, and its pushed anywhere where people are comfortable and anesthetized enough to not care...most of western democracy at this point. Canadians for the most part are very comfortable and have a high quality of life so they tend to go with the flow.

I didnt start thinking deeply on it until I had kids TBH.

I have hope, I think Brexit and Trump are the first major push-backs.




Anyone who takes this as me being anti-lgbt can gtfo, I am absolutely not. I am 100% for individual and community responsibility, keeping power and decision making as local as possible.

Government is there to provide defense and major services, not tell you how to think.

Its sad as a Canadian you have to say things like this because the minute you don't like something you become a racist xenophobe bigot

Canadian2point0
06-09-2017, 05:16 PM
This would only apply to white families. They would not implement this on any minority such as a muslim or black familyThe only minority that gets hit hard by Children Services in Canada are First Nations.

Watch this family lawyer explain the powers of Children Services(CAS) in Ontario, it'll give you chills....

dI-_1KQcGBs

badbart
06-09-2017, 05:25 PM
starting? I'd take just about anyone else next door than a liberal. I'd probably come home one day to them trying to tell my GF that she's not really a female and it's all in her head or trying to get my dog(female) to lift her like like a dude.

How about neither.

A-GAME
06-09-2017, 05:45 PM
****ing Canadians. When will they learn?

Beararms
06-09-2017, 06:19 PM
Stuff doesnt surprise me anymore and nothing will stop it as the millenials will eventually take over with the liberal mindset and change everything. Just gonna stay in my small town that doesnt see much of this stuff. I've lost hope in society.

lexbishop
06-09-2017, 06:40 PM
Why the **** aren't Canadians storming the government? Imagine having your kids taken away over this obvious government condoned child abuse?

A significant number of trannies commit suicide,transition or not. Is this okay for Canadians?

That not only will your children be taken away from you but your child will probably end up killing him or herself? They are basically pointing a gun to your whole family's head! What the **** Canada?

Take your ****ing rights back you idiots!

AlwaysFocus
06-09-2017, 09:33 PM
Why the **** aren't Canadians storming the government? Imagine having your kids taken away over this obvious government condoned child abuse?

A significant number of trannies commit suicide,transition or not. Is this okay for Canadians?

That not only will your children be taken away from you but your child will probably end up killing him or herself? They are basically pointing a gun to your whole family's head! What the **** Canada?

Take your ****ing rights back you idiots!

We can't. The cuckolding is too strong.

I mean, me and my buddies wanna fight back. But how when there is millions of liberal cucks who think diversity is strength?

Canadians literally ENJOY it.

rammer19
06-09-2017, 10:34 PM
We can't. The cuckolding is too strong.

I mean, me and my buddies wanna fight back. But how when there is millions of liberal cucks who think diversity is strength?

Canadians literally ENJOY it.

You dont have to fight millions of people. Its only the people coloring the news that you need to worry about.

They influence the public more than even the publics on eyes. Simply identify and then change out the influencers. I bet its less than 500 people.

A-GAME
06-09-2017, 10:51 PM
Absolute lunatics.

This is why there is really no option for me but to vote straight-ticket Republican from now on. Yes, the GOP is utterly stupid, but anything is better than the modern left.

Completely serious, I would much rather live in a moderate/conservative state governed by Sharia than many leftist utopias.

Jesus Christ, it's about time you ****ing woke up lmao. Why do you think we supported Trump? Because he has great hair and a shapely figure?

Canadian2point0
06-10-2017, 04:12 AM
Why the **** aren't Canadians storming the government? Imagine having your kids taken away over this obvious government condoned child abuse?

A significant number of trannies commit suicide,transition or not. Is this okay for Canadians?

That not only will your children be taken away from you but your child will probably end up killing him or herself? They are basically pointing a gun to your whole family's head! What the **** Canada?

Take your ****ing rights back you idiots!Cuz of 1st world guilt. Canada has never had any serious terrible periods in our history, so people are extremely resistant to see/act against our government in a negative way.

ZenBowman
06-16-2017, 07:14 AM
Jesus Christ, it's about time you ****ing woke up lmao. Why do you think we supported Trump? Because he has great hair and a shapely figure?

I will not be voting to faux-conservatives like Trump, sorry.

I should have said "straight ticket GOP or nothing, depending on the choices". Not going to vote for warmongers like McCain or frauds like DJT.

ssg10587
06-16-2017, 07:25 AM
I will not be voting to faux-conservatives like Trump, sorry.

I should have said "straight ticket GOP or nothing, depending on the choices". Not going to vote for warmongers like McCain or frauds like DJT.

Honestly man, anything is better than Hillary or the Bern.

I'd take the first chimpanzee president versus Hillary.

Canadian2point0
06-16-2017, 07:34 AM
And somehow, you have now turned that into a thread on how this legislation will lead to the government taking children away from parents if they don't respect their gender identity . Sorry, it's pretty clear this bill doesn't do what you're saying it does in the OPIt's not in reference to "respecting" gender identity/expression. It's the fact that Children Services can now make a legal case in Family Court that denying/repressing/not supporting trans identity of your kid/ward, is child abuse. Therefore, a judge can grant a warrant of seizure to Children Services(CAS) on grounds of said abuse.

sooby
06-16-2017, 08:17 AM
We can't. The cuckolding is too strong.

I mean, me and my buddies wanna fight back. But how when there is millions of liberal cucks who think diversity is strength?

Canadians literally ENJOY it.

Maybe where you live but literally go to almost every rural area and they are 95% conservative. Where I live it's like 50/50. It's not even just liberals as well, a lot of conservatives are being cucks.

Retoaded
06-16-2017, 08:22 AM
I will not be voting to faux-conservatives like Trump, sorry.

I should have said "straight ticket GOP or nothing, depending on the choices". Not going to vote for warmongers like McCain or frauds like DJT.


Come throw your vote away on the libertarian potato out of disgust of the two major parties. It makes you feel better.