PDA

View Full Version : [Facts inside] is this election rigged?



krendan
11-03-2016, 12:28 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwRslyvWgAAWz-5.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwRuUWlXYAAynLo.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwR6qqMWcAAy13F.jpg


https://twitter.com/0HOUR1___/status/793878844742696961



Hold on to this and compare to the values next week.


Why would they possess such data?

ODBM
11-03-2016, 12:34 AM
Link: http://ftpcontent4.worldnow.com/wmctv/elections/wmc-electionresults.html


What... the fuk.

Just recorded a video of myself opening that link and scrolling through the results. If they take the page down, I'll still have the numbers and evidence that it did exist.

repos
11-03-2016, 01:28 AM
if you compare the numbers in 2012 you had about 126 million votes combined, if you compare 2008 you have 128million, 2004 was 121million . A simple sniff test would be to tally the votes to see if they compare, then check the news for signs of voter turnout. Using 2012 as the benchmark, the screen shot you posted is around 98million votes. So your at a 28 million deficit, which as a percent of population would show voter turnout at the lowest in decades.

This makes your post highly suspicious, like one of those gawker/biebart screenshots purportedly true but just skillfully edited.

TruKnight
11-03-2016, 01:36 AM
*takes off tinfoil hat for a moment*

its prolly just a dry run to make sure it all works right on tuesday

exyl
11-03-2016, 01:41 AM
*takes off tinfoil hat for a moment*

its prolly just a dry run to make sure it all works right on tuesday

The 100% of precincts reporting is suspicious

forthenoodz
11-03-2016, 01:44 AM
they could literally kill your friends and say "he was a russian spy" and you can't say anything

this country is beyond cucked

BruceBoxteitner
11-03-2016, 02:01 AM
if you compare the numbers in 2012 you had about 126 million votes combined, if you compare 2008 you have 128million, 2004 was 121million . A simple sniff test would be to tally the votes to see if they compare, then check the news for signs of voter turnout. Using 2012 as the benchmark, the screen shot you posted is around 98million votes. So your at a 28 million deficit, which as a percent of population would show voter turnout at the lowest in decades.

This makes your post highly suspicious, like one of those gawker/biebart screenshots purportedly true but just skillfully edited.

Click on the link in the post above yours--it's all there.

Then click here and read about WorldNow:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNow

PSToolman
11-03-2016, 06:20 AM
Came in promised facts. Left disappointed.

RougeProdigy
11-03-2016, 06:26 AM
So you post the most likely scenario for the election, and then claimed that result will be rigged?

Let's see if those exact numbers pan out.

PlanoLifter
11-03-2016, 08:07 AM
*takes off tinfoil hat for a moment*

its prolly just a dry run to make sure it all works right on tuesday

This is what I think too.

OP, if you think this is proof of anything then I have a bridge to sell you.

ghjk24
11-03-2016, 08:08 AM
Sk4rGByANr8

117Jesus
11-03-2016, 08:39 AM
Clinton winning Arkansas? Lmaoooooooooooo