PDA

View Full Version : Why does trump speak like an angry 8 year old



NeoginCF
03-08-2016, 03:28 AM
1988 trump


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEPs17_AkTI

He says the exact same thing without sounding like a lunatic, so he can do it but he doesn't. He basically started talking in twitter format.

zinkhan99
03-08-2016, 03:30 AM
1988 trump

He says the exact same thing without sounding like a lunatic, so he can do it but he doesn't. He basically started talking in twitter format.

It seems to work just fine. He did start sound more literate after Super Tuesday then got attacked from all sides again so he went back to his old rhetoric.

NeoginCF
03-08-2016, 03:34 AM
It seems to work just fine. He did start sound more literate after Super Tuesday then got attacked from all sides again so he went back to his old rhetoric.

It does seem to work but it is also his largest criticism.

DocHol1day
03-08-2016, 03:34 AM
I mentioned this in another thread. He seems much more presidential and dignified when he was younger.

My guess, he's appealing to the angry "silent majority" to get the nomination but will tone it down in the general election to attract moderates and anti hilary voters.

TheFornicator1
03-08-2016, 03:45 AM
It's because he's being attacked. If you watch him sit down with somebody now he still has that same poise in him. He's not going to sit around and act all cute when by the time this process is over there will have been over $1bn spent trying to bring him down.

NeoginCF
03-08-2016, 03:50 AM
It's because he's being attacked. If you watch him sit down with somebody now he still has that same poise in him. He's not going to sit around and act all cute when by the time this process is over there will have been over $1bn spent trying to bring him down.

The reason they are spending $1bn is because they don't see him fit as a president, which does have to do with the way he acts.

TheFornicator1
03-08-2016, 03:56 AM
The reason they are spending $1bn is because they don't see him fit as a president, which does have to do with the way he acts.

That's not the reason at all. It's because he'd chit on 5 decades worth of globalist planning.

The fascist, Hitler, crude, rude, etc is all just bluster to take him down by public image.

leafs43
03-08-2016, 05:53 AM
He isn't low energy.

lalaland86
03-08-2016, 06:06 AM
That is how men used to talk, but SJW have beaten us down like dogs and made us weak timid creatures. Now we only speak truth on the misc. We used to speak like this to each other in real life.

FRANKCANNON
03-08-2016, 06:34 AM
Location: Belgium

Don't you have some wooden shoes to make?

NeoginCF
03-08-2016, 06:57 AM
That's not the reason at all. It's because he'd chit on 5 decades worth of globalist planning.

The fascist, Hitler, crude, rude, etc is all just bluster to take him down by public image.

Five decades of globalist planning, by lizardpeople jews I suppose.


He isn't low energy.

Does have small hands though.


That is how men used to talk, but SJW have beaten us down like dogs and made us weak timid creatures. Now we only speak truth on the misc. We used to speak like this to each other in real life.

There is a difference between being timid and talking like a normal human being as seen in the video in the OP. Some of his speeches, such as the best words speech, are just ramblings which make him look like a madman.


Location: Belgium

Don't you have some wooden shoes to make?

That'd be holland, get your stereotypes right.

Renegade83
03-08-2016, 07:08 AM
It just goes to show how intelligent his electorate is. He had to regress himself to a high school level intellect to connect with them. I mean the dude saw it fit to talk about his hand and dick size for a week.

DocHol1day
03-08-2016, 07:18 AM
It just goes to show how intelligent his electorate is. He had to regress himself to a high school level intellect to connect with them. I mean the dude saw it fit to talk about his hand and dick size for a week.

The older i get the more i realize a benevolent, philosopher king would be superior to democracy. It makes me sick just how much control we allow others to have over our lives.

Ive been a minarchist for a long time but even anarcho capitalism is preferable to this.

Renegade83
03-08-2016, 07:22 AM
The older i get the more i realize a benevolent, philosopher king would be superior to democracy. It makes me sick just how much control we allow others to have over our lives.

Ive been a minarchist for a long time but even anarcho capitalism is preferable to this.

I've been disturbingly on the same side as Stizzel a few times this election cycle, honestly made me question my beliefs.

TheFornicator1
03-08-2016, 07:23 AM
Five decades of globalist planning, by lizardpeople jews I suppose.

No. Maybe you haven't been taking notice of the world around you but globalism is a real thing; corporate globalism a real thing too. Study a little history.

If you want something more along the lines of conspiracy theory though, here's the UN (United Nations...) migration chief Peter Sutherland... who was also the founding director general of the World Trade Organization and former chair of Goldman Sachs International


The EU should "do its best to undermine" the "homogeneity" of its member states, the UN's special representative for migration has said.

Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.

He also suggested the UK government's immigration policy had no basis in international law.

He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.

Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development , which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.

He told the House of Lords committee migration was a "crucial dynamic for economic growth" in some EU nations "however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states".
'More open'

An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the "key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states", he added.

"It's impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated."

At the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice
Peter Sutherland, UN special representative for migration

The UN special representative on migration was also quizzed about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.

He told the committee: "The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.

"And that's precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine."

Mr Sutherland recently argued, in a lecture to the London School of Economics, of which he is chairman, that there was a "shift from states selecting migrants to migrants selecting states" and the EU's ability to compete at a "global level" was at risk.

And look at you now over there in Europe 4 years later... swallowing up the "refugees" of the world's nation building projects...

kratosbrah
03-08-2016, 07:28 AM
hes a wharton educated high class new york businessman, he can be articulate if he wants to be but he can also pander to his audience

hillary & obama do chit like this too, hell pretty much every politician changes up the way the speak to cater to their demographics.