PDA

View Full Version : Cp3 is a better pg,Derrick Rose is a better player.



MrGrimes
03-08-2012, 12:47 PM
/thread

Yes Derrick rose homer,nut hugger,man crush...idgaf


Cp3 is the true meaning of a point guard in every aspect of the position but i would still choose rose.

rafiki121
03-08-2012, 01:17 PM
/thread

Yes Derrick rose homer,nut hugger,man crush...idgaf


Cp3 is the true meaning of a point guard in every aspect of the position but i would still choose rose.

Rose is definitely the better player, but point guard wise i guess paul takes it. his passing is amazing

Greg1983
03-08-2012, 01:19 PM
Rose is a point guard. Paul is a point guard. Therefore the better point guard is the better player.

LeonardShelby
03-08-2012, 02:14 PM
Rose is a point guard. Paul is a point guard. Therefore the better point guard is the better player.

Not true. Rose's official position is point guard. But his real position is Bulls' scorer.

MrGrimes
03-08-2012, 02:19 PM
Not true. Rose's official position is point guard. But his real position is Bulls' scorer.

thisssssss!thank you

ThaRealCzar
03-08-2012, 03:34 PM
Not true. Rose's official position is point guard. But his real position is Bulls' scorer.
I like you sir

sdballer5588
03-08-2012, 03:36 PM
http://i41.tinypic.com/343rhaa.jpg

Wu-Massacre
03-08-2012, 03:37 PM
if we're talking about better PG then Steve Nash>>>>both of them

Hardcore_D00d
03-08-2012, 03:40 PM
if we talking about pg's then linsanity > all

sdballer5588
03-08-2012, 03:41 PM
if we talking about pg's then linsanity > all

http://i43.tinypic.com/35jjjp0.gif

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 04:09 PM
if we're talking about better PG then Steve Nash>>>>both of them

but he cant even guard his position.

sircharles032
03-08-2012, 04:14 PM
Traditional "positions" are outdated in today's NBA / 10

Wu-Massacre
03-08-2012, 04:17 PM
but he cant even guard his position.Steve Nash does everything better then all of them at the PG position god forbid he doesnt rack up on the steals...the whole Nash doesnt "defend" argument has gotten old he isnt great but he isnt bad enough to take him out of the top spot of pg in the NBA

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 04:25 PM
the argument's gotten old or he hasnt played defense for a really long time?

they played the clippers last friday and this fraud needed grant hill to do his dirty work and guard chris paul.

plus he turns the ball over more than chris paul.
PG job #1....protect the ball.


moving along...

Wu-Massacre
03-08-2012, 05:35 PM
the argument's gotten old or he hasnt played defense for a really long time?

they played the clippers last friday and this fraud needed grant hill to do his dirty work and guard chris paul.

plus he turns the ball over more than chris paul.
PG job #1....protect the ball.


moving along...Deron Williams was shiiting on CP3 last night and the Clips had Foye defend D-Will the rest of the way in the 3rd through the 4th...

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 05:42 PM
so chris Paul guarded deron williams then?

more than half of the night?
when does Nash ever guard a good PG?

GoingPlaces
03-08-2012, 05:57 PM
Jordan is a better shooting guard, kobe bryant is a better basketball palyer

GetBigyo
03-08-2012, 06:04 PM
Chris Paul is the better PG and the better player.

Wu-Massacre
03-08-2012, 06:05 PM
so chris Paul guarded deron williams then?

more than half of the night?
when does Nash ever guard a good PG?You're saying anything now....You're homerism is blinding you it's okay though

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 06:14 PM
this is retarded...

steve nash never guards the PG position.

chris paul guards deron williams for 3 quarters, they switch the bigger guard onto deron for matchup purposes and now you're comparing the 2 situations.

please leave.

Wu-Massacre
03-08-2012, 06:22 PM
this is retarded...

steve nash never guards the PG position.

chris paul guards deron williams for 3 quarters, they switch the bigger guard onto deron for matchup purposes and now you're comparing the 2 situations.

please leave.first CP3 defended Deron for 2 quarters second your argument about Nash being a terrible defender was that CP3 was lighting Nash up so they had Grant defend CP3 instead......Magnets how do they work?

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 06:23 PM
Grant hill guarded him from the tip off to the end of the game phaggot!!!!!!


Nash never guarded him at all!!!!!
Stfu!

Wu-Massacre
03-08-2012, 06:27 PM
Grant hill guarded him from the tip off to the end of the game phaggot!!!!!!


Nash never guarded him at all!!!!!
Stfu!That makes your argument even worse...Shawn Marion guards PG all the phucking time does that make Jason Kidd a shiity defender? Nash is a better PG then CP3 get over it

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 06:31 PM
THROW AWAY THAT STRAWMAN THAT YOU JUST KNOCKED DOWN.

we've seen j.kidd guard wade and kobe successfully in the playoffs...he can defend...nash cannot

nash not guarding the pg is in no way similar to kidd not guarding the PG.

Wu-Massacre
03-08-2012, 06:33 PM
THROW AWAY THAT STRAWMAN THAT YOU JUST KNOCKED DOWN.

we've seen j.kidd guard wade and kobe successfully in the playoffs...he can defend...nash cannot

nash not guarding the pg is in no way similar to kidd not guarding the PG.So now that we established J-Kidd can defend better then Nash by your logic Kidd is better.

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 06:41 PM
current or both in their primes?

sdballer5588
03-08-2012, 06:44 PM
current or both in their primes?

Nash is a 2 time MVP. He's better in every and any scenario vs Kidd you phaggot.

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 06:55 PM
easy on the name calling.

kidd has been to three nba finals and won an NBA championship.

inb4 the eastern conference.
not keeping that kinda score...just keeping the only tally that really matters right?

sdballer5588
03-08-2012, 06:57 PM
easy on the name calling.

kidd has been to three nba finals and won an NBA championship.

inb4 the eastern conference.
not keeping that kinda score...just keeping the only tally that really matters right?

K. Rondo > Cp3.

2 finals appearances, 1 ring. Umad.

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 06:58 PM
rings are only an arbitor in an argument over who is better if the players are on the same level.


charles barkley > robert horry.

sdballer5588
03-08-2012, 06:59 PM
rings are only an arbitor in an argument over who is better if the players are on the same level.


charles barkley > robert horry.

I'm just showing the tangent you're going off on.

You've fallen all the way from a cp3 convo to a Kidd vs Nash argument because the basis for your points is so convoluted.

Be_Easy_25
03-08-2012, 07:02 PM
the nash point was brought up by another person who was saying nash > both because he was the purest pg of them all.

i said...fail...pure? guard ur own position.
he twisted, turned and pretzeled that comment into "any one who is capable of guarding the pg spot is better than nash"
lame.

so no...not only are the arguments fail....the nash tangent isnt my fault either.