PDA

View Full Version : Best team not in the playoffs = Oakland Raiders



rnaco
01-02-2011, 12:46 PM
but its their own fault. If the fatass kicker could make his kicks they'd be in post season. Idiot is making millions a year to kick a ball and can't even do it.

cchar042
01-02-2011, 12:48 PM
Blaming your season on the kicker is a strong indication of the failure of a team as a whole.

UAGreg
01-02-2011, 12:49 PM
Blaming your season on the kicker is a strong indication of the failure of a team as a whole.

If your kicker missed a 20 yard FG as time expired against the Cardinals (to win the game) you'd be mad too

Bowyermania
01-02-2011, 12:50 PM
actually its the Bucs imo ... possibly might be the Packers

homicidal_misc
01-02-2011, 12:50 PM
Tim Tebow disagrees

BeanieWells
01-02-2011, 12:52 PM
Lettuce be reality...the only reason the game was even close was because of fluke muffed punts bouncing off the return team and giving da Raiders free 50 yard gains.

Erik2806
01-02-2011, 12:52 PM
surely the fact you could only score 9 points in a loss to the 49ers, and fuked up by losing 4 of your last 6 games had nothing to do with why u arent in the playoffs......

cchar042
01-02-2011, 12:52 PM
If your kicker missed a 20 yard FG as time expired against the Cardinals (to win the game) you'd be mad too

I would, but Janikowski isn't the only problem with that team. Their defense really isn't that good at all.

iamgenus
01-02-2011, 12:53 PM
If your kicker missed a 20 yard FG as time expired against the Cardinals (to win the game) you'd be mad too

And they get into the playoffs with a 9-7 record how??

ezmac31
01-02-2011, 12:53 PM
lions

robogain
01-02-2011, 12:54 PM
wasnt just the cardinal game bro.. we lost to the ****ty ass niners.. nothing went right that day

cchar042
01-02-2011, 12:54 PM
lions

9-7 next year.

cor030
01-02-2011, 12:54 PM
Buccaneers for sure. Raiders are a close second.

scotyg
01-02-2011, 12:56 PM
the problem with the raiders all season was inconsistency. people forget they lost to Tennessee, Arizona, and San Francisco. they will be a very good team next year, thier d is pretty nasty

ezmac31
01-02-2011, 12:59 PM
9-7 next year.

agree. maybe 10-6 if they do things right

Sherloc
01-02-2011, 01:00 PM
I really don't see them going to the playoffs for a few more years as our team is just getting some momentum as the majority of our team is rookies (6th youngest team in the NFL).

Our real threat next year is the Chargers.

robogain
01-02-2011, 01:03 PM
i honestly see this year as a fluke for the chiefs. cassel played good enough and didnt throw interceptions. we saw the real cassel today in teh raider game.

cheifs probably go 6-10 next year.. Raiders go 11-5

UAGreg
01-02-2011, 01:03 PM
I would, but Janikowski isn't the only problem with that team. Their defense really isn't that good at all.

Not sure if srs

Sherloc
01-02-2011, 01:18 PM
i honestly see this year as a fluke for the chiefs. cassel played good enough and didnt throw interceptions. we saw the real cassel today in teh raider game.

cheifs probably go 6-10 next year.. Raiders go 11-5

Wishful thinking... We are one of the youngest teams in the NFL (6th), it's only going up from here.

TheStack
01-02-2011, 01:19 PM
I really don't see them going to the playoffs for a few more years as our team is just getting some momentum as the majority of our team is rookies (6th youngest team in the NFL).

Our real threat next year is the Chargers.

6-0 in the division

we are the threat deal with it

Chiefs will finish 3rd or 4th next year

Harganoff
01-02-2011, 01:20 PM
Too bad the Patriots have their first round draft pick

Coolface
01-02-2011, 01:22 PM
Thread title made me lol. Thanks OP

Sherloc
01-02-2011, 01:23 PM
6-0 in the division

we are the threat deal with it

Chiefs will finish 3rd or 4th next year

This a joke? I think you're funny. As inconsistent at the Chiefs are the Raiders make them look tame.

whyumadson
01-02-2011, 01:25 PM
This a joke? I think you're funny. As inconsistent at the Chiefs are the Raiders make them look tame.

Monitor - Samsung LN40B750 (cnet top rated CCFL LCD ever)



u mad im rockin a 60 inch sharp lcd?

http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/u-mad1.jpg

robogain
01-02-2011, 01:25 PM
Too bad the Patriots have their first round draft pick

too bad you thot it was gonna be #4, now its gonna be like #18.


richard seymour for at teh very least 2 years. probably more. > anyone u pick at #18. thanks for the trade

Iczer
01-02-2011, 01:26 PM
Monitor - Samsung LN40B750 (cnet top rated CCFL LCD ever)



u mad im rockin a 60 inch sharp lcd?

Panasonic AE3000u

ya you mad I'm rocking 108" screen

Acevedo85
01-02-2011, 01:31 PM
Too bad the Patriots have their first round draft pick

theyll trade aso for a 1st

Sherloc
01-02-2011, 01:32 PM
Monitor - Samsung LN40B750 (cnet top rated CCFL LCD ever)



u mad im rockin a 60 inch sharp lcd?

http://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/u-mad1.jpg

Lol, you think 60" makes it good, your a ****in retard. 1080p = 2073600 pixels which look worse the higher the dot pitch is depending on your seated distance. Not to mention a multitude of other factors such as what kinda panel the company uses, TN, VA, or IPS. I could further add that the depth of black level is crucial as well as factory color calibration, accurate color tones etc etc etc. You're not a techy don't speak about tech if you haven't a clue. Sharp isn't even in the top 3 tv manufacturers.

bodybuilder127
01-02-2011, 01:32 PM
Bucs?
Giants?
Packers?

Sherloc
01-02-2011, 01:33 PM
Bucs?
Giants?
Packers?

^^^

cchar042
01-02-2011, 01:34 PM
too bad you thot it was gonna be #4, now its gonna be like #18.


richard seymour for at teh very least 2 years. probably more. > anyone u pick at #18. thanks for the trade

Tom Brady was 199.. Just saying.

bodybuilder127
01-02-2011, 01:38 PM
^^^

Depending on who wins today..

Dan.
01-02-2011, 01:47 PM
are you guys serious? Have you not heard of the bucs this year? Josh freeman throwing only 6 picks the entire season, blount 2nd best back in the league right now?? Not to mention we beat the ****ing raiders in the superbowl. The bucs will be the team to beat in a few years. Would have already been in the playoffs had we not been robbed by the refs in the lions game.

feardafronfz3
01-02-2011, 01:49 PM
are you guys serious? Have you not heard of the bucs this year? Josh freeman throwing only 6 picks the entire season, blount 2nd best back in the league right now?? Not to mention we beat the ****ing raiders in the superbowl. The bucs will be the team to beat in a few years. Would have already been in the playoffs had we not been robbed by the refs in the lions game.

Lions>Bucs


ya dig?

cchar042
01-02-2011, 01:51 PM
Lions>Bucs


ya dig?

Uh-oh, I think you just kicked the hornets nest.


2011-12:

Lions 9-7
Bucs 6-10

..Just sayin

FlyinTurdNugget
01-02-2011, 01:57 PM
Buccaneers for sure. Raiders are a close second.

This.

I don't know how you can say any other team not currently in the big dance is better than a 10-6 Bucs team. esp the .500 raiders or whatever they are.

Acevedo85
01-02-2011, 01:58 PM
are you guys serious? Have you not heard of the bucs this year? Josh freeman throwing only 6 picks the entire season, blount 2nd best back in the league right now?? Not to mention we beat the ****ing raiders in the superbowl. The bucs will be the team to beat in a few years. Would have already been in the playoffs had we not been robbed by the refs in the lions game.

you do realize th superbowl was 8 yrs ago yes?

but i do agree about the bucs

FlyinTurdNugget
01-02-2011, 01:58 PM
Uh-oh, I think you just kicked the hornets nest.


2011-12:

Lions 9-7
Bucs 6-10

..Just sayin
lol uhhhh no.

cchar042
01-02-2011, 01:59 PM
Let's be real here.





UConn > Raiders

cchar042
01-02-2011, 02:00 PM
lol uhhhh no.

Strong edit..

feardafronfz3
01-02-2011, 02:01 PM
Bucs have 1 win against a team that is above .500, I am not convinced they are a dynasty in the making

FlyinTurdNugget
01-02-2011, 02:09 PM
Bucs have 1 win against a team that is above .500, I am not convinced they are a dynasty in the making

And that was against the Saints.


Also only lost to the Ravens and Falcons by less than a touchdown. Bucs>Raiders. Cmon now.

Dan.
01-02-2011, 02:14 PM
Uh-oh, I think you just kicked the hornets nest.


2011-12:

Lions 9-7
Bucs 6-10

..Just sayin

do you even watch football?

even though they only have 1 win against a really good team (superbowl winners) no one expected the bucs to do this well this season, not even the management. ESPN never showed the bucs before, not even highlights of the games. Now they talk about them all the time. Bucs are on the rise. Lions suck and will always suck for years to come.

FlyinTurdNugget
01-02-2011, 02:22 PM
do you even watch football?

even though they only have 1 win against a really good team (superbowl winners) no one expected the bucs to do this well this season, not even the management. ESPN never showed the bucs before, not even highlights of the games. Now they talk about them all the time. Bucs are on the rise. Lions suck and will always suck for years to come.

I'm not quite sure how you watch the Bucs this year and then say they'll go 6-10 next year.

cchar042
01-02-2011, 02:23 PM
I'm not quite sure how you watch the Bucs this year and then say they'll go 6-10 next year.

I said they'd go 6-10 next year.

And I don't watch them, I'm just trying to rile up the masses.

ESPforMe
01-02-2011, 02:25 PM
do you even watch football?

even though they only have 1 win against a really good team (superbowl winners) no one expected the bucs to do this well this season, not even the management. ESPN never showed the bucs before, not even highlights of the games. Now they talk about them all the time. Bucs are on the rise. Lions suck and will always suck for years to come.
The Bucs lost against the Lions. At home.

FlyinTurdNugget
01-02-2011, 02:33 PM
I said they'd go 6-10 next year.

And I don't watch them, I'm just trying to rile up the masses.
I know you did. I was just reaffirming what he said.